MJ Adlong
New member
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2018
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 1
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Ever since Rodrigo Duterte assumed the role of President of the Philippines, and perhaps even before that, he has made antagonizing steps against the United States of America.
Despite the existing Mutual Defense Treaty between the two countries, the president is currently seeking relations with China, Russia, and other countries that may be considered somewhat a threat towards America. His actions also suggest that USA is partially responsible for the state of the Philippines. One issue that comes to mind regarding this would be the Spratlys Island reclamation. Instead of reminding China of the ruling wherein the Philippines would have exclusive economic rights to the area, he has expressed his thoughts in that the United States are to be blamed for not taking proactive measures to secure the island.
Another instance wherein Duterte expressed his thoughts about America would be during his State of the Nation Address (SONA) speech, resurfacing the issue on the Balangiga Bells- a historical heritage that is currently in possession of the United States ever since the 1901 conflict between the Filipino guerillas and American troops. Both countries have given the bells significant meaning and asking for it to be returned is not just a case for the country’s historical pursuit, but also a political statement. The bell was also asked to be given back by former Philippine President Fidel V. Ramos, but was denied by Bill Clinton.
Speaking of which, Duterte has also made a personal attack against his family after Chelsea Clinton, Bill’s daughter, made remarks regarding Duterte’s claims to allow soldiers under Martial Law to rape three women. To respond, Duterte brought up the scandal between Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. Although this does not directly attack the United States as a country, his offensive barks towards a former president does not improve his relations with the country.
That said, it should be noted that the President of the Philippines has been hostile towards USA especially during the Obama’s Administration. When the presidency shifted to Donald Trump, it seems as though the relationship between the two leaders had warmed. This is mainly due to both of them acknowledging each other’s competencies to lead their respective countries.
These instances are only among some of Duterte’s negative interactions with the United States. Given the situation at hand, does the comfortable and friendly treaty between the Philippines and the United States being threatened under the new presidency? More importantly, is it wise for the president to aggravate its relationship with the Americans in hopes of aligning himself with other countries that may prove to be more advantageous for the Philippines?
Despite the existing Mutual Defense Treaty between the two countries, the president is currently seeking relations with China, Russia, and other countries that may be considered somewhat a threat towards America. His actions also suggest that USA is partially responsible for the state of the Philippines. One issue that comes to mind regarding this would be the Spratlys Island reclamation. Instead of reminding China of the ruling wherein the Philippines would have exclusive economic rights to the area, he has expressed his thoughts in that the United States are to be blamed for not taking proactive measures to secure the island.
Another instance wherein Duterte expressed his thoughts about America would be during his State of the Nation Address (SONA) speech, resurfacing the issue on the Balangiga Bells- a historical heritage that is currently in possession of the United States ever since the 1901 conflict between the Filipino guerillas and American troops. Both countries have given the bells significant meaning and asking for it to be returned is not just a case for the country’s historical pursuit, but also a political statement. The bell was also asked to be given back by former Philippine President Fidel V. Ramos, but was denied by Bill Clinton.
Speaking of which, Duterte has also made a personal attack against his family after Chelsea Clinton, Bill’s daughter, made remarks regarding Duterte’s claims to allow soldiers under Martial Law to rape three women. To respond, Duterte brought up the scandal between Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. Although this does not directly attack the United States as a country, his offensive barks towards a former president does not improve his relations with the country.
That said, it should be noted that the President of the Philippines has been hostile towards USA especially during the Obama’s Administration. When the presidency shifted to Donald Trump, it seems as though the relationship between the two leaders had warmed. This is mainly due to both of them acknowledging each other’s competencies to lead their respective countries.
These instances are only among some of Duterte’s negative interactions with the United States. Given the situation at hand, does the comfortable and friendly treaty between the Philippines and the United States being threatened under the new presidency? More importantly, is it wise for the president to aggravate its relationship with the Americans in hopes of aligning himself with other countries that may prove to be more advantageous for the Philippines?