• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

North Korea Is Not De-Nuclearizing

I don't exactly think you get what I was trying to say.
You claimed that North Korea has only recently equipped themselves with nuclear weapons, and you said that America did not invade them like how they did towards Afghanistan and Iraq. Situation between North Korea and those two Middle Eastern nation is and was completly different. Which major nation were those two nations supported by? Which major nation was supporting and was guaranteeing the independence of North Korea back then? China. US declration of war against the N Koreans would have brought the Chinese into the war, meaning it could have led into some sort of a world conflict.

If America wished to have started a possible 3rd World War against China, sure they would have

According to whom?

If America wished to have started a possible 3rd World War against China, sure they would have according to whom?

According to whom if America wished to have started a possible 3rd World War against China sure they would have?

We battled the Chinese for years in the 1950s and there was no WWIII. You do understand the spanking issued the N Koreans did bring the Chinese into the war.
 
China knows full well who is now and who has been destabilizing the region since the turn of last century. Y'all talk like the US has been a force for good in that region. Millions of millions slaughtered by the US tell a very different story, one that has a measure of reality, not just rank USA propaganda, which is all you folks live with.


Just stop with the US terrorism. Doncha think three quarters of a century of US terrorism is long enough. How much more evil do you want your governments to inflict upon the poor of the world?

The US destabilizing the area?

WTH are you talking about?
 
I havent bought into it. Not sure why others have.

I just think that NK liked 'being part of the rest of the world' during the Olympics and is trying to leverage that.

NK (KJ Un) felt like he got some respect for a brief time and liked how it felt....looking to work that angle IMO,, extend it, see what more he can get out of it.
 
North Korea had no choice but to suspend its nuclear tests because its sole underground nuclear test site collapsed under the stress of multiple explosions, rendering it unsafe for further testing. North Korea is a small country and radiation leaks from the test site could pollute the entire country.

North Korea’s underground nuclear test site has become unusable after a large part of it collapsed, Chinese scientists say. Their evidence comes just one week after a surprise announcement from leader Kim Jong Un that North Korea would stop nuclear tests, with one researcher suggesting to the South China Morning Post that the collapse was the real reason for the unexpected suspension. The experts, led by researchers at the University of Science and Technology of China, have warned that another blast in the same spot and with similar yield to one in September, which is believed to have caused the collapse, could lead to “environmental catastrophe.” “The occurrence of the collapse should deem the underground infrastructure beneath mountain Mantap not be used for any future nuclear tests,” said an abstract for the study.
 
According to whom?

If America wished to have started a possible 3rd World War against China, sure they would have according to whom?

According to whom if America wished to have started a possible 3rd World War against China sure they would have?

We battled the Chinese for years in the 1950s and there was no WWIII. You do understand the spanking issued the N Koreans did bring the Chinese into the war.

It didn't start a WW 3 because back in the Korean War because-
1. China did not have nuclear weapons
2. China was still under civilwar supported by the Soviet Union
3. China was not an independent nation that could match the power of both US and the USSR during 1950.

1950-1953 scenario is completely different to the possible scenario that could have played out a few decades later.
Now talking about your question, 'according to whom', back in the Cold War, it was the Soviet Union's proposal to sign the seize fire in order to stop the conflict in Korea. Think about it, US declaring war again to a Soviet proposed seize fire. China, who clearly showed their point that they do not wish to border the South Koreans would have sided with the North Koreans while the Soviet Union would have taken US's declaration as breaking the 'treaty'.
 
It didn't start a WW 3 because back in the Korean War because-
1. China did not have nuclear weapons
2. China was still under civilwar supported by the Soviet Union
3. China was not an independent nation that could match the power of both US and the USSR during 1950.

1950-1953 scenario is completely different to the possible scenario that could have played out a few decades later.
Now talking about your question, 'according to whom', back in the Cold War, it was the Soviet Union's proposal to sign the seize fire in order to stop the conflict in Korea. Think about it, US declaring war again to a Soviet proposed seize fire. China, who clearly showed their point that they do not wish to border the South Koreans would have sided with the North Koreans while the Soviet Union would have taken US's declaration as breaking the 'treaty'.

China was not an independent nation? Who knew?

And by 1949 the civil war was pretty much over as the KMT has retreated to Taiwan.

And Nuclear Weapons are a prerequisite to a World War? So who had nukes during WWI and WWII?

And a 1940s CEASE fire agreement with the USSR (no longer there) has what to do with today and now?
 
Im not interested in your anti-American crap.

One of the most lame of the US's propagandist memes, meant for the most brainwashed groups that can't address the issues, the facts, the truth.
 
North Korea had no choice but to suspend its nuclear tests because its sole underground nuclear test site collapsed under the stress of multiple explosions, rendering it unsafe for further testing. North Korea is a small country and radiation leaks from the test site could pollute the entire country.

Wow, new info! If true, that's great.
 
China was not an independent nation? Who knew?

And by 1949 the civil war was pretty much over as the KMT has retreated to Taiwan.

And Nuclear Weapons are a prerequisite to a World War? So who had nukes during WWI and WWII?

And a 1940s CEASE fire agreement with the USSR (no longer there) has what to do with today and now?

1st off, when did I say the 1940s Cease Fire?
2nd off, I have clearly explained why an mass war could begun if the 1953s Soviet cease fire agreement would have been broken because the Soviet Union DID NOT wish to have a conflict in Korea at the first place. And guess what? Soviet Union did have nukes during the 50s meaning another US invasion of their allie could have caused either an mass human
3rd, the US had nukes during WW2.
 
Back
Top Bottom