- Joined
- Dec 18, 2013
- Messages
- 2,788
- Reaction score
- 1,697
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Last week CA released Attila: Total War. CA`s pervious game Rome 2 was a complete disaster. Buggy, glitchy, hillariously stupid AI, mashed up rotten textures, weird gameplay, lagging aand other crap. But all the establishment reviewers gave Rome 2 great reviews, with IGN giving Rome 2 for example a rating of 8.8 out of 10. Attila was fixed, it is a really good and fun game, but for some weird reason IGN gave the game 8.1. One other notorious example of last year is when they gave Alien Isolation a horrendous rating eventhough the game could have possibly been the best game of 2014.
We all know that IGN gets payed by developers to review their games in a positive way and that this trends is mostly followed through by most other mainstream game reviewers. Besides that there is also political motivations crawling into the games industry like for example by those soul less morons who started off the gamergate non issue. Sites like Kotaku are especialy eager to jump on into such bandwagons.
So which game reviewers do you still trust and watch today?
For me it`s Razorfist, Zero Punctuation and Elders Geek:
We all know that IGN gets payed by developers to review their games in a positive way and that this trends is mostly followed through by most other mainstream game reviewers. Besides that there is also political motivations crawling into the games industry like for example by those soul less morons who started off the gamergate non issue. Sites like Kotaku are especialy eager to jump on into such bandwagons.
So which game reviewers do you still trust and watch today?
For me it`s Razorfist, Zero Punctuation and Elders Geek: