• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Racist prof says "Let them *&#!* die"

Status
Not open for further replies.
You mean to defend such men as President Trump a man who once called for four young black men to be executed in a full page paid for adv due to an attack and rape of a young woman in central park?

A crime that they was complete innocent of.

Seem Trump had been making full use of his freedom to hate a large percent of the human race without blow back from people such as yourself.

Yeah, because as we all know, americanwoman is a big defender of Trump. :roll:
 
You mean to defend such men as President Trump a man who once called for four young black men to be executed in a full page paid for adv due to an attack and rape of a young woman in central park?

A crime that they was complete innocent of.

Seem Trump had been making full use of his freedom to hate a large percent of the human race without blow back from people such as yourself.

um, no that's not what I mean at all.

There are some people here who defend the mistreatment of minorities as the freedom to hate. I am simply questioning if their defense of that freedom extends to this guy in the OP as well.
 
um, no that's not what I mean at all.

There are some people here who defend the mistreatment of minorities as the freedom to hate. I am simply questioning if their defense of that freedom extends to this guy in the OP as well.

Claims of hypocrisy which is what you're implying, always cut both ways. Where's the condemnation of this dude from people supposedly so opposed to racist comments/speech or is it just ok when directed toward whites?
 
Claims of hypocrisy which is what you're implying, always cut both ways. Where's the condemnation of this dude from people supposedly so opposed to racist comments/speech or is it just ok when directed toward whites?

Well, to those types of people it's not racism, only "prejudice", because black people can't be racist in their mind.
 
... so he SAID; " Let them Die" :roll:

... that's it? :confused:
 
Claims of hypocrisy which is what you're implying, always cut both ways. Where's the condemnation of this dude from people supposedly so opposed to racist comments/speech or is it just ok when directed toward whites?

Very true. The one here defending this creep would lose his mind if it was the other way around and it was a white professor.
 
Well, to those types of people it's not racism, only "prejudice", because black people can't be racist in their mind.

Yes, and no matter how you demonstrate that yes, they can (just like everyone else), they'll keep redefining and narrowing the scope of what it means to be racist until it excludes anyone but white people of even the possibility of being guilty of such a thing.
 
Sorry, should I have used crayons. ;)

Didn't think it was a hard question, given your vast knowledge on Black experiences.

Do you separate out "black experience" from "human experience" in some way, because you know not everybody sees it that way.
 
Do you separate out "black experience" from "human experience" in some way, because you know not everybody sees it that way.

Only when those experience have been the same ... do we need to go any further or should I suggest a few history books for your to read?
 
Not sure why lawmakers should be calling for the dismissal of a professor at a private college.

You don't think that information was already provided in the quote of the article?

, both alumni of Trinity College,
 
Only when those experience have been the same ... do we need to go any further or should I suggest a few history books for your to read?

Could it be any clearer that you are in the "only whites can be racist" camp?
 
There's a distinct difference between someone saying, "I like the current President" and saying "an entire race of people should die".

Just sayin'.

You should read the articles you comment on.

Here's a quote from the professor.

from the article said:
"They are thinking I'm talking about a Congressman," Williams said, referring to the shooting last week of a member of Congress. "That's not at all the case."

"I'm calling for the death of a system, white supremacy, not the death of white people," Williams said

He made some angry posts and clarified. I don't think he's a hero, and I don't agree with his posts, but the OP is a misrepresentation of this case, and the Campus Reform article is inflammatory excrement.
 
Could it be any clearer that you are in the "only whites can be racist" camp?

No that's not true ... I never deal with labeling entire groups of people, because I have the stones to go after individuals.

If I see a bad individual do something bad, I'm front and center saying they are responsible.

If I see someone interested as a professional and a authority do something wrong, I'm front and center saying they are accountable for their act, not the organization.

So if a Black Guy calls you a White Honky, that's Racist; not much of a difficult distinction, if someone calls me a Nigger.

The only thing with me is, I'm usually the Guy helping up the Racist after pushing his teeth to the back of his neck. I figured no need to scream Racist now, I think he's cured ... at lest from calling me outside of my name.

Doesn't work for everyone, your milage my differ.
 
Last edited:
He is a sick puppy if repeat if the quotes are correct however repeat however if you fired him and he is a tender professor your open the door for firing a professor for any comment such as Trump is a wonderful president.

On his now-locked account he wrote, "It is past time for the racially oppressed to do what people who believe themselves to be 'white' will not do - put end to the vectors of their destructive mythology of whiteness and their white supremacy system.

Willliams added that he is "fed the [expletive] up with self-identified white's daily violence directed at immigrants, Muslim and sexually and racially oppressed people. The time is now to confront these inhuman [expletives] and end this now."

Williams then linked to a story from "Medium" which offers a list of instances in which white people should be left for dead because of racial injustices.

"If you see them drowning, if you see them in a burning building... if they are in a park and they turn their weapons on each other, do nothing," the article reads.

"Let them [expletive] die."

Scalise and several others were shot in an Alexandria, Va. ballpark by a left-wing activist who was also white.
Prof Blasts 'Inhuman' White People, Endorses Idea EMT's Should've Let Scalise Die | Fox News Insider
 
You should read the articles you comment on.

Here's a quote from the professor.



He made some angry posts and clarified. I don't think he's a hero, and I don't agree with his posts, but the OP is a misrepresentation of this case, and the Campus Reform article is inflammatory excrement.

Thanks so much for the help, but I already read that. I don't buy his clarification. Looking at his own posts, it's pretty clear to me that he wasn't just referring to the "white supremacy system".
 
I already know about his clarification. I don't buy it. Reading his own posts, it's pretty clear to me that he wasn't just referring to the "white supremacy system".

Sorry to jump on you like that, but I don't dismiss his clarification. His social media posts were terrible, but I can forgive his momentary anger. I see no reason not to accept it when he clearly states that he's not calling for the death of white people.

The Campus Reform article in the OP is just intended to incite and fan the flames. It's a misrepresentation of the actual events. And it indirectly led to threats and a campus shutdown.
 
Sorry to jump on you like that, but I don't dismiss his clarification. His social media posts were terrible, but I can forgive his momentary anger. I see no reason not to accept it when he clearly states that he's not calling for the death of white people.

The Campus Reform article in the OP is just intended to incite and fan the flames. It's a misrepresentation of the actual events. And it indirectly led to threats and a campus shutdown.

Campus Reform is a watchdog group, and I'm glad they were watching; elsewise, I might not have read about this last night.

And don't rationalize his hate speech as "momentary anger." Calling whites "inhuman" IS hate speech.
 
Campus Reform is a watchdog group, and I'm glad they were watching; elsewise, I might not have read about this last night.

And don't rationalize his hate speech as "momentary anger." Calling whites "inhuman" IS hate speech.

You mean you were incited by conservative propaganda designed specifically to incite you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom