• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Brett's nanoscience.

BrettNortje

Banned
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
793
Reaction score
22
Location
Cape Town
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
This is working with very small chemicals that may work differently to the larger clusters of them, some say their effects might even be opposing. They might be opposite because of the effects they give off might be the same, yet the volume they give them off in may be so weak that they are overpowered by the rest of the cells, so that they flow up stream instead of the usual downstream. this would be like mud - lots of sand and to little water would result in actual wet sand instead of mud, and too much water instead of sand would mean the sand would merely sink to the bottom. as for the actual mud, if it is raining, the mud may find itself turn into water, with a little bit of sand in it.

If we were to look at gold, a commonly used atom in this science, then we could see that it could be said to float on water, and absorb water, so it acts as wood, yes? then, at this microlevel, it could be said to be too small to absorb water into it, so would maybe sink, as it would not be able to contain the water.

Thus things can act differently or opposite to how they work at a macro level, or, bigger level. this is because of absorption and atomic mass, as, the less mass it has, the easier it is to dilute, and, therefor water is 'the boss' at this level.
 
Nonotechnology is all about chemistry, engineering and biology. usually, it is used to make medicine or tiny tools inside your body to change things inside of you.

To understand what you need for chemistry, you only need to know solubility and other effects of the regular chemicals. for engineering, you only need to know a little geometry and algebra. for the biology, you only need to know where the thing is going, and, how it will affect the rest of your body.
 
Of course, the best 'machines' to build must follow strong 'shapes' to keep them strong. like, a triangle, a square and a circle. these are the most basic shapes, so must be the strongest. personally i do not see how a fancy shape would hold together as well inside the veins or fluids, of course.

Another thing to take into account is that if it is a biological use you are making the molecule for, it should be made out of carbon or magnesium, as the more basic the element, or the less dense it is, it will affect the body less - imagine something rusting inside of you? that would be terrible i guess.

Maybe if we were to observe that we can build anything like with lego blocks, or children's building blocks, we could easily build these apparatuses, but, if we were to observe that it will get too big and cost too much, we introduce engineering, of course. this would be where we find the smallest cheapest things to build with, of course, as money is always a factor.

Then again, we could make much more complicated machinery than at our macro level, as the atoms could be placed together then shaped from acids that we guide to chisel the shapes and gears out of the atom or molecule. maybe observing which atoms are naturally attracted to each other would help? if we were to observe the laws of gravity, where smaller solids are drawn to larger solids, because they have many electrons while the other atom has fewer protons, as electrons and protons are attracted to each other, and this lack of each other draws them closer, then we could find natural ways to build things quickly. this electron to proton grip is based on electromagnetism, as the electron is responsible for the one force, the proton is responsible for the other force, one being magnetism for the proton, and the other being electron bonds and electricity for the electron. this force draws the meek thing to the dense thing, as, the dense thing has more active energy, like a north and south magnet, of course.

So, if we were to observe that we can easily build little machines using polarity, or pole effects, we could also see that we could 'dig out' the atom into gears and such by using a magnet over the area, with the shape we wish to leave behind etched onto the magnetic device. this will remove or draw the excess of the molecule to the rest of the liquid or surrounding area. of course, if we were to observe this is only partially effective, we would also use a 'north to south' effect on the outside of the molecule, and, this will remove the areas that we have chosen to be 'drawn away.' this makes the engineering side of it easier.
 
With it being so easy to shape the things that are made out of solids, and remembering that you must usually build these things in liquids, as then they can move around and you can interact with them, it now comes to making the little gears inside the machines to perform functions like a normal machine.

Making the gears could be done by using our electromagnet, but, getting a electromagnet that small would be hard. this is why we need to build a tool inside the liquid next to the 'thing' we are building. but, this would require small things still, and we cannot build a bigger thing to make smaller things.

So, we now need to drag electrons and protons around and construct molecules with them dragging the positive spin things, which is the actual matter, into place, of course. this can be done by shaping the 'tool' by arranging the orbitals into densities, where, the orbitals will shape themselves as they find longevity of balance, or, settle down into a working 'collage.'
 
Back
Top Bottom