• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Reading?

weaver2

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2019
Messages
14,963
Reaction score
12,329
Location
Oregon's High Desert
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Do any of you pro-life men read anything more complex than Infowars and Breitbart? There is literature out there that addresses every one of the questions you keep dragging onto the Abortion site. It would appear from posts that none of you have read any of it. What is your problem with reading. Did all pro-life men fail reading in elementary school?
 
Do any of you pro-life men read anything more complex than Infowars and Breitbart? There is literature out there that addresses every one of the questions you keep dragging onto the Abortion site. It would appear from posts that none of you have read any of it. What is your problem with reading. Did all pro-life men fail reading in elementary school?

What literature would you suggest?
 
Do any of you pro-life men read anything more complex than Infowars and Breitbart? There is literature out there that addresses every one of the questions you keep dragging onto the Abortion site. It would appear from posts that none of you have read any of it. What is your problem with reading. Did all pro-life men fail reading in elementary school?

It is obvious that you have no real intention of discussing the issue, and resorting to generalized ad hominem does nothing to advance this in any regard.
 
It is obvious that you have no real intention of discussing the issue, and resorting to generalized ad hominem does nothing to advance this in any regard.

Yep. I'm staunchly pro-choice.

This thread belongs in the trash.
 
It is obvious that you have no real intention of discussing the issue, and resorting to generalized ad hominem does nothing to advance this in any regard.

You are absolutely right. It's an ad hominem attack and does nothing to advance a discussion what so ever. You are wrong that it is generalized. It's pretty specific. Anti-abortion men don't seem to have any interest in reading anything. They seem to have avoided the activity entirely. The level of knowledge they exhibit and the questions they pose are just plain dumb. They require everybody to waste time explaining basics. They interrupt intelligent discussions. They pose stupid hypothetical situations and then demand answers. They get huffy and start calling names when they aren't taken seriously. And they post the same idiocies about abortion over and over and over even thought people have been polite and explained stuff to them.

You betcha this is ad hominem! It's supposed to be.
 
Last edited:
What literature would you suggest?


You already have suggestions, lots and lots of them. Go back and look them up. Why should someone make up yet another reading list for you to ignore. You obviously, from the statements you make, never read anything ever suggested to you.
 
You already have suggestions, lots and lots of them. Go back and look them up. Why should someone make up yet another reading list for you to ignore. You obviously, from the statements you make, never read anything ever suggested to you.

haha ok.
 
Do any of you pro-life men read anything more complex than Infowars and Breitbart? There is literature out there that addresses every one of the questions you keep dragging onto the Abortion site. It would appear from posts that none of you have read any of it. What is your problem with reading. Did all pro-life men fail reading in elementary school?

What's "Infowars" and "Breitbart"?
 
What's "Infowars" and "Breitbart"?

You have a computer? Good!

Does your computer have a keyboard? Good

Are you connected to the internet? Good

Can you read and write? Good


Look it up
 
None of these books address the morality of abortion. However re-arranging the order of the titles results in a hilarious reading list:

Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy
Seven Steps to Regaining and Maintaining Virginity
The Psychology of Self-Deception
 
This guy is baiting us. Don't respond.
 
I don't usually. The stuff he posts is just too dopy, but the book list he gave is hilarious if arranged properly. Couldn't resist.

If your happy. That's good. But i wouldn't give this poster the time of day. But im Aussie, what would i know.
 
This guy is baiting us. Don't respond.

I have said this many times about several posters in other ways. Nobody listens to me., which is why threads in this section always get derailed by trolls.

Here is a list of posters who should be on every pro-choicer's DP ignore list:

TypicalRussian
marke
Highlander
Mashmont
2distracted
 
I have said this many times about several posters in other ways. Nobody listens to me., which is why threads in this section always get derailed by trolls.

Here is a list of posters who should be on every pro-choicer's DP ignore list:

TypicalRussian
marke
Highlander
Mashmont
2distracted

I only know highlander. And he is very questionable.
 
I have said this many times about several posters in other ways. Nobody listens to me., which is why threads in this section always get derailed by trolls.

Here is a list of posters who should be on every pro-choicer's DP ignore list:

TypicalRussian
marke
Highlander
Mashmont
2distracted

I will keep them in mind and report back.
 
None of these books address the morality of abortion. However re-arranging the order of the titles results in a hilarious reading list:

Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy
Seven Steps to Regaining and Maintaining Virginity
The Psychology of Self-Deception

Exactly my point, the arguments has no morality, these are sterile selfish arguments, deceiving no one but themselves, so you might understand the hypocrisy of of a book maintaining ones virginity! But as high brow as the feminist dogma, and behaviour pertaining to there martyrdom!
 
I only know highlander. And he is very questionable.

I think I agree, you detest honesty, you enjoy hypocrisy, and there is only one opinion that has any credibility, yours! Thank god your not representative of your sex! Ooh... and you're not a martyr when you murder a child regardless at what stage the baby's gestation or after its birth!
Yip, no misunderstand from my point of view, but Iagain, I believe in love not death, I believe in aspirations, not death.i believe in life, not death!
 
I have said this many times about several posters in other ways. Nobody listens to me., which is why threads in this section always get derailed by trolls.

Here is a list of posters who should be on every pro-choicer's DP ignore list:

TypicalRussian
marke
Highlander
Mashmont
2distracted

Honestly, I have tried to raise your discussion from plain, selfishness, greed, your self centred screaming about rights and your agenda, while I try to our responsibility, to morality to humanity, but your skill sets let you see nothing more than your own petty outlook.
A child has many stages, who the hell do you are when you think you can decide when life starts or stops?
And that's when your hypocrisy knows no bounds!
 
I only know highlander. And he is very questionable.

Typical is the most obvious troll. He never uses the mult-quote feature and usually just types short sentences, always beginning with a lowercase letter. He never answers any questions or reads the supporting evidence provided that proves he is wrong. He likes to act like Donald Trump, saying, "I win," and he proved something after he already lost the argument. If you only put one poster on ignore, he is the one.

Marke uses Highlander's posting style, but is extremely religious and changes topics to include his obsessions about sexual orientation and evolution, which he bases on the far right fundamental Baptist teachings. He calls everyone who supports abortion rights a "godless" person, trying to make everyone believe you must agree with his church's teachings (which I know are lies) just to not be an atheist.

Mashmont is the easiest one to find now in threads about crisis pregnancy centers. It will not take long for you to figure out what is wrong with him.

2distracted usually does not post in this section, but every time I do see him, he is terrible. He admitted he can't stand to see any comments or article quotes from liberals.
 
Back
Top Bottom