• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Recent Louisiana Abortion Decision: No Worries. Truth and Righteousness ALWAYS Prevail

I suppose common decency and legal definitions boils down to judgement.

You should try it sometime..... it'll give you a backbone to stand up for right, the weak, those without a skirling bullying womanly voice demanding her rights above all else.


Oooh let's not forget contract law.....!
 
Last edited:
Sine die

Contract law is the same in every country.
Provide the tenant abides by the lease, please note yet again, abides by the lease, the lease cannot be terminated. END.

Contract law.

When the womb has been outsourced, its rented out for lease period.END.

No, if it’s not in the lease
Lease. And I quote from your link.
You might not have had the foresight to know that you would sell during your tenant’s lease term, or that you’d want to move in. That means you probably didn’t put an early termination clause in the lease that your tenant agreed to and signed. If that’s the case, then you can’t kick your tenant out without cause. Period. End of story.
End quote
As I said, contract law

Yah. Every skull is a universe.
 
Abortion violates another person's personal integrity far worse. It is ridiculous I have to spell things like this out to you.

Since the majority of women are pro-life and not pro-choice, why do you not like women?

There is only 1 person involved in abortion, the pregnant woman. Why is that so difficult to understand.

And being personally pro-life does not mean women are against other women making their own mind up. Hence the fact that 2/3's of Americans support the legality of abortion and Roe v. Wade.
 
We;ve been over this 100 times. Merriam Webster's definition of 'child' includes 'unborn persons'. Also, according to MW 'baby' is synonymous with 'child'. But I understand why you feel you must divert over trivial nomenclature.

Wrong as usual. It says "especially infant". A ZEF is not yet a child. Stop making up nonsense because it is obvious you are plain wrong as always.
 
I didn't. You compared women to farm animals.

Whoops, another violation of the commandment of not bearing false witness. Why do you make it so easy for us to be victorious in winning any discussion with you.
 
So you're basically saying abortion is OK because it's not against the law. That's asinine, of course, and it is the entire reason for this debate. We are saying it should be illiegalized because it is morally wrong. You're saying abortion should be legal because it's legal.

Anti-women? Most women call themselves pro-life and not pro-choice, meaning I am pro-women and you are anti-women.

And all the moral pro-life women run out and get abortions when they have an unwanted pregnancy just exactly for the same reasons and at the same rate as all the women that are honest about abortion. Absolutely the only difference between the two sets of women is that pro-choice women are not lying hypocrites.

When pro-choice women are pregnant with an unwanted fetus they go to Planned Parenthood usually with the father or a family member who supports them. They get abortions.Their reasons are honest. They know they have done the right thing. When pro-life women are pregnant with an unwanted fetus they go to Planned Parenthood by themselves. They get abortions. Their reasons are honest and yet they lie about what they have done and they go back to calling pro-choice women immoral because they have "killed their babies". Just like they did.
 
Morally, things are worse now, not better. Family dysfunction, broken relationships, fatherless kids, poor single mothers. Drug abuse, suicide. That is a direct result of liberalism and its accompanying atheism.. But it will all get straightened out in one fell swoop. It will be painful, but it will happen. Always has. Always will.

All of that has been occurring since the beginning of time. Progress and the development of better communication technology has made us more aware of these problems and has allowed us to create avenues of help for families struggling with these ubiquitous social ills. And religious dogma has been on a steady decline since the Renaissance and the rate of decline is only increasing with better and more available education. What do you think will happen that will reverse this trend?
 
Morally, things are worse now, not better. Family dysfunction, broken relationships, fatherless kids, poor single mothers. Drug abuse, suicide. That is a direct result of liberalism and its accompanying atheism.. But it will all get straightened out in one fell swoop. It will be painful, but it will happen. Always has. Always will.

Family dysfunction among the working poor and poor can be laid right at the feet of the conservatives for having passed legislation that made assistance available only to single mothers.
 
I quote:- If a woman morally believes that her responsibilities to others in her life, that it's more important to give everything to kids or elderly or disabled or others in her life instead, to uphold her obligations and commitments to employer, church, community, society, it's completely right.

Abortion is the antithesis of giving, morality, responsibility, obligations community, commitment and society.

But you carry on deceiving yourself, perhaps you need to to justify the unjustifiable.

Flushing, a raspberry, more words to avoid calling it a baby, but again obviously to deflect from its actual function and purpose of a womb, creation.
Aah, natural behaviours, a mothers instinct, creating, nurturing, loving, or in certain cases, not at that moment as it isn't convenient, kill it, we can call it a raspberry to ease our conscious.
But then family rules my life, and as I'm not materialistic nor interested very much in money, I place my values on other things.
I'm not judging you, I detest the thought you think its natural and a right.
You lease a flat to a bad tenant, you are forced by law to allow the lease to expire before removing tenant. Your womb is no different.

And here we have another one without a UTERUS wanting to dictate to those of us with one what to do or not do with ours and it's contents.

There is no lease w/ pregnancy. The zygote forces itself on the woman by lowering her immune system so that her body does not reject it as foreign.

Lursa did not call the embryo a raspberry. Reread that part of her post.
 
What need have you to compare women to farm animals? They are different species. As for blacks, they have long been referred to as 'apes', though I don't do that. But I see in your last couple of paragraphs, you, yourself say all humans are apes, including all races. So you did the very thing you falsely accused me of doing. I'm sorry, humans are not apes.

All humans are primates. That is FACT.
 
Yet, you are unable to use your words to debate your opinions.

Like a screaming targer , I'm right, you're wrong, if it's wrong for a man to behave in that manner, what makes you doing the same thing..... right?
I don't believe when your discussing someone else's life.... you or I have any rights, over the existence of that life.
But I would apreaciate you dissecting my submission, that would be constructive.

Please use the quote feature when replying to someone. That way, we know who you are talking to.
 
We;ve been over this 100 times. Merriam Webster's definition of 'child' includes 'unborn persons'. Also, according to MW 'baby' is synonymous with 'child'. But I understand why you feel you must divert over trivial nomenclature.

And you've been schooled on the fact that the unborn are not persons.
 
With respect, an apple tree produces Apples not oranges, you cannot be half pregnant, if your pregnant, your carrying a baby, not apples..... a baby a person.

So what? Abortion is legal.
 
With respect, an apple tree produces Apples not oranges, you cannot be half pregnant, if your pregnant, your carrying a baby, not apples..... a baby a person.

Legally speaking, the unborn are not yet persons, although some people wish them to be.

Ultimately though, the only opinion that matters is what the mother thinks. The rest of us should should take her lead. If she wants to call the unborn a baby, then so should we. If she doesn't, then we shouldn't.
 
With respect, an apple tree produces Apples not oranges, you cannot be half pregnant, if your pregnant, your carrying a baby, not apples..... a baby a person.

I didn't say anything about apple trees or half pregnant. I said a zef is not a person. That is FACT.
 
Legally speaking, the unborn are not yet persons, although some people wish them to be.

Ultimately though, the only opinion that matters is what the mother thinks. The rest of us should should take her lead. If she wants to call the unborn a baby, then so should we. If she doesn't, then we shouldn't.

Agree with the bolded but let's remember that a pregnant woman is not a mother until she gives birth. Until then, she's a pregnant woman but you're right, what she calls her unborn is her prerogative. Nobody should be correcting her.
 
Legally speaking, the unborn are not yet persons, although some people wish them to be.

Ultimately though, the only opinion that matters is what the mother thinks. The rest of us should should take her lead. If she wants to call the unborn a baby, then so should we. If she doesn't, then we shouldn't.
Listen, leagally speaking they aren't apples!
Now, that's the real you, blood and guts..... me...me .... me.. and me....no one else counts! I can do what ever I like....the only opinion that counts is the mother..... just look at these words.... mother..... mother...... what hypocrisy!
 
Agree with the bolded but let's remember that a pregnant woman is not a mother until she gives birth. Until then, she's a pregnant woman but you're right, what she calls her unborn is her prerogative. Nobody should be correcting her.
A timely defence!
 
I didn't say anything about apple trees or half pregnant. I said a zef is not a person. That is FACT.
Oooh..... I bow to you're superior knowledge.
When does a "zef" what I'd call a embryo/baby become a baby, when it's got arms and legs? A brain? A heart? When it can feel?
Go on, let me hear your wisdom!
 
Oooh..... I bow to you're superior knowledge.
When does a "zef" what I'd call a embryo/baby become a baby, when it's got arms and legs? A brain? A heart? When it can feel?
Go on, let me hear your wisdom!

When we say so
 
It's okay, I expect you to have that, marginalised, outlook. I was always taught to work with the tools you have.... and some can be very blunt

Yep. We won this war over 40 years ago
 
Back
Top Bottom