- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 118,508
- Reaction score
- 74,310
- Location
- Outside Seattle
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
All of this backs up their argument about personal responsibility. If one was acting according to that they would not get pregnant in the first place and if they did then they would not abort their irresponsibility.
yes and I've seen it many times. I addressed it here in this thread:
At least 2/3 of Americans have sex responsibly. And we all know that no non-surgical bc is 100% effective.
Should married couples that cant afford kids yet not have sex? Jeez, that would be hell on the divorce rate.
And are you saying people should double-down on irresponsibility? Or...try to correct the original accident?
Should married couples that cant afford kids yet not have sex? Jeez, that would be hell on the divorce rate.
And are you saying people should double-down on irresponsibility? Or...try to correct the original accident?
And really, if you know abortion is an option...is it really irresponsible to risk having sex with BC?
This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."
That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.
It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa