• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Abortion Apologetics

Angel said:
Yes, I know this is what you claim. You don't appear capable of answering the basic question that follows from your claim, however. So far two lies and this dodge. Let's see how long you are going to carry on in evasion mode.
Click to expand...

Except you question has nothing do with with my comment. And I am not the one lying. If I make an error I am man enough to say so.

And again, no dodging, I just am not going to go into a discussion with you that has nothing to do with the subject of this thread. This way I hope to prevent another repeat of your first post when you think (without justification) that you need to remind people of the subject of the thread. Nice try but I am not going to entertain your lack of logic.
 
Angel said:
Yes, you made an erroneous comment about "abortion apologetics" and are now in full squirm mode in your posts.
Click to expand...

:2rofll:

:screwy

I am not squirming, where do you come up with such nonsense. Just because you post ideas taken from pro-life views is not my problem, nor is it my problem that you don't like me pointing it out.
 
Peter King said:
Except you question has nothing do with with my comment. And I am not the one lying. If I make an error I am man enough to say so.

And again, no dodging, I just am not going to go into a discussion with you that has nothing to do with the subject of this thread. This way I hope to prevent another repeat of your first post when you think (without justification) that you need to remind people of the subject of the thread. Nice try but I am not going to entertain your lack of logic.
Click to expand...
A third lie! My question comes directly out of your claim that the nature of human being is different from mother nature -- directly out of your claim! And here you are in full unabashed denial. If the nature of human being is not attributed to mother nature, then to what?

Answer the question or admit you've dug yourself into a hole you can't get out of.
 
Peter King said:
:2rofll:

:screwy

I am not squirming, where do you come up with such nonsense. Just because you post ideas taken from pro-life views is not my problem, nor is it my problem that you don't like me pointing it out.
Click to expand...
No, your problem is you post mistakes and then refuse to own up to them.
 
Angel said:
A third lie! My question comes directly out of your claim that the nature of human being is different from mother nature -- directly out of your claim! And here you are in full unabashed denial. If the nature of human being is not attributed to mother nature, then to what?

Answer the question or admit you've dug yourself into a hole you can't get out of.
Click to expand...

Stop making a spectacle of yourself by calling other people liars. You question had nothing to do with my comment.

Really, you think human nature is attributed to mother nature, nope, wrong again. Human nature has to do with our attitudes that were created through our experiences and our societies.
 
Angel said:
No, your problem is you post mistakes and then refuse to own up to them.
Click to expand...

But I did not make a mistake, the only mistake is this thread and the illogical pro-life adjacent views in it.
 
Peter King said:
Stop making a spectacle of yourself by calling other people liars. You question had nothing to do with my comment.

Really, you think human nature is attributed to mother nature, nope, wrong again. Human nature has to do with our attitudes that were created through our experiences and our societies.
Click to expand...
The spectacle is your fifth lie. My question had all to do with your comment.

Peter King: Human nature does not derive from Mother Nature.
Angel: Then where does human nature derive from if not Mother Nature?

There could not be a question more directly related to a comment.

At last here in this latest post of yours you offer an answer to the question: experience and society.

The answer is ridiculous of course as human experience and society follow logically and temporally from human nature, not the other way around. And with a good-faith interlocutor I would press the issue, but you are not that sort of interlocutor and since you are a notorious Last Wordist I'll rest content with the record as is and let you post your face-saving last salvo. Good day, sir.
 
Peter King said:
But I did not make a mistake, the only mistake is this thread and the illogical pro-life adjacent views in it.
Click to expand...
Yes, you mistook "abortion apologetics" as coming out of a pro-life view, whereas it comes out of a pro-abortion view. You don't seem to know the meaning of apologetics. Everything you and the other pro-abortion members post about abortion is apologetics -- a defense of abortion.
 
Angel said:
The spectacle is your fifth lie. My question had all to do with your comment.

Peter King: Human nature does not derive from Mother Nature.
Angel: Then where does human nature derive from if not Mother Nature?

There could not be a question more directly related to a comment.

At last here in this latest post of yours you offer an answer to the question: experience and society.

The answer is ridiculous of course as human experience and society follow logically and temporally from human nature, not the other way around. And with a good-faith interlocutor I would press the issue, but you are not that sort of interlocutor and since you are a notorious Last Wordist I'll rest content with the record as is and let you post your face-saving last salvo. Good day, sir.
Click to expand...

More lies I see from you. My comment was:

I made a statement about the nature of human beings being different than mother nature.
Click to expand...

And your question was:

Quote Originally Posted by Angel

If human being does not share in the nature of the rest of the universe, that is to say if human being is a special case, how do you account for the existence of human being? It can't be by way of Evolution, which is the way of the creatures of Mother Nature. So how do you account for the existence of this special case, human being?
Click to expand...

Which has nothing to do with human nature being different than mother nature, it does not claim human beings not sharing in the nature of the rest of the universe.

That you continue to peddle the nonsense and untruths is not my problem. My comment had nothing to do with the rest of the universe, it had nothing to do with the existence of human beings. So stop posting untrue things about me. I did not answer this question because it had nothing to do with my previous comment.

And I am a last wordist, yup, that happens when you insult and lie about what I wrote. If you don't like that, stop writing insults and untrue bull crap.
 
Angel said:
Yes, you mistook "abortion apologetics" as coming out of a pro-life view, whereas it comes out of a pro-abortion view. You don't seem to know the meaning of apologetics. Everything you and the other pro-abortion members post about abortion is apologetics -- a defense of abortion.
Click to expand...

Yup, because it is a pro-life excuse for denouncing and insulting people who support the freedom of choice.

And more untruths I see, most of us are pro-choice, that you keep insulting and lying about how that makes people pro-abortion is your problem. We are not going to make it ours, period.
 
Angel said:
The spectacle is your fifth lie.
Click to expand...
To most it is the crap you post and pretending that it is anything else.

The answer is ridiculous of course as human experience and society follow logically and temporally from human nature, not the other way around.
Click to expand...
On what do you base that assertion? You must be the one who shoved the riddle of which came first, the chicken or the egg.
 
weaver2 said:
What have you done to Angel? S/he seems obsessed about your posts. Every time I post something unacceptable I am accused of being you. :cheers: LOL
Click to expand...

I refused to accept his BS and challenged him to support his claims. Which as you well know invariably results in him trying to divert, being dishonest when called out on that dishonesty he resorts to insults.

Specifically he is mad because he started a thread and tried continually to make a strawman because he knew my statement destroyed every single one of his "arguments" that he has ever made. When I refused to let him get away with it he went ballistic
 
Peter King said:
More lies I see from you. My comment was:



And your question was:



Which has nothing to do with human nature being different than mother nature, it does not claim human beings not sharing in the nature of the rest of the universe.

That you continue to peddle the nonsense and untruths is not my problem. My comment had nothing to do with the rest of the universe, it had nothing to do with the existence of human beings. So stop posting untrue things about me. I did not answer this question because it had nothing to do with my previous comment.

And I am a last wordist, yup, that happens when you insult and lie about what I wrote. If you don't like that, stop writing insults and untrue bull crap.
Click to expand...

He cant stop
 
Angel said:
If you're really interested in the origin of our enmity, read for yourself:
Quag and the Angel: a dialogue
From Quag you'll only get bull****.
Click to expand...

Excellent thread where I squash your pathetic attempts to make strawmen and you refuse to engage honestly, putting your true colors on display for all to see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom