• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What attracts anti-abortion males to this site?

weaver2

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2019
Messages
14,812
Reaction score
12,140
Location
Oregon's High Desert
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Ninety percent of the males that post on the abortion site are rabidly anti-abortion. They post statements about the law, women, abortion, pregnancy, fetuses that are simply untrue. They make accusations about women that are ignorant and rude. They ignore sourced material proving them to be lying and go right back to posting the same lies. They make up impossible situations then demand women defend themselves against these nonsense scenarios.

Why do they post here? They don't have a good grasp of the subject. Are they trying to scold women into abandoning the pro-choice position? Teach them who is boss. Shame shame women into obedience?


Anti-abortion men; what's your purpose for being on this thread?
 
Ninety percent of the males that post on the abortion site are rabidly anti-abortion. They post statements about the law, women, abortion, pregnancy, fetuses that are simply untrue. They make accusations about women that are ignorant and rude. They ignore sourced material proving them to be lying and go right back to posting the same lies. They make up impossible situations then demand women defend themselves against these nonsense scenarios.

Why do they post here? They don't have a good grasp of the subject. Are they trying to scold women into abandoning the pro-choice position? Teach them who is boss. Shame shame women into obedience?


Anti-abortion men; what's your purpose for being on this thread?

To defend innocent life.
 
To defend innocent life.

Can you please explain why you value an 'innocence' of nothingness? The unborn cannot think, cannot act, cannot even form intent. That 'innocence' is no different than the 'innocence' of a flower or a couch. That is the 'innocence' of a vacuum, of emptiness. Can you please explain why you value that over the entirety of a woman's life and future?

And what is the woman guilty of?
 
Which, of course, implies guilt for electing not to carry it (not a person with rights) to term.

Not at all. It's a person's value that doesn't make the distinction between viable tissue and a child.

Why is it that inside the womb, it's OK to kill the innocent life, but 1 minute later when born, it's not?

This doesn't make sense to me. Other than an excuse to to shoulder the burden.
 
To defend innocent life.

Based on what? The life is only "innocent" until it is capable of choosing to disobey the parents. So if innocence is all you care about, you probably have no interest in what the future baby does after birth. To care about the new life at all you have to care about more than the fact that before birth, it is unable to sin, because after being born, soon it will become a sinner.
 
Last edited:
Not at all. It's a person's value that doesn't make the distinction between viable tissue and a child.

Why is it that inside the womb, it's OK to kill the innocent life, but 1 minute later when born, it's not?

This doesn't make sense to me. Other than an excuse to to shoulder the burden.

One minute later, nobody is thinking about killing the baby. This is what Weaver was referring to in her OP about impossible hypothetical situations. IT NEVER HAPPENS.

The reasons are very easy to learn if you are willing to read the links we provide. But you MUST click on them without any preconceived bias that the information is factually incorrect.
 
Why is it that inside the womb, it's OK to kill the innocent life, but 1 minute later when born, it's not?

So... how many abortions take place 1 minute before the innocent life is born?
 
So... how many abortions take place 1 minute before the innocent life is born?

Not many, but at least many states are limiting third trimester abortions.
 
Not many, but at least many states are limiting third trimester abortions.

The point was that nobody is aborting a child in the third trimester (let alone the last few days or minutes) before the due date. This is because the mom wants the child. Otherwise she would abort much MUCH earlier. Consequently the idea that it is a nothing and then it is a baby 1 minute later is pretty irrelevant.
 
Ninety percent of the males that post on the abortion site are rabidly anti-abortion. They post statements about the law, women, abortion, pregnancy, fetuses that are simply untrue. They make accusations about women that are ignorant and rude. They ignore sourced material proving them to be lying and go right back to posting the same lies. They make up impossible situations then demand women defend themselves against these nonsense scenarios.

Why do they post here? They don't have a good grasp of the subject. Are they trying to scold women into abandoning the pro-choice position? Teach them who is boss. Shame shame women into obedience?


Anti-abortion men; what's your purpose for being on this thread?

Do you know the difference between anti-abortion and pro-choice or are you just pretending not to?
 
Can you please explain why you value an 'innocence' of nothingness? The unborn cannot think, cannot act, cannot even form intent. That 'innocence' is no different than the 'innocence' of a flower or a couch. That is the 'innocence' of a vacuum, of emptiness. Can you please explain why you value that over the entirety of a woman's life and future?

And what is the woman guilty of?

Excellent! I have always had a problem with that term myself, "innocent baby" or "innocent life". I have never once in my life heard of anyone mention or talk about guilty babies or guilty fetuses. But you are right to question the mother's guilt. Always, it seems, if there is blame or guilt, the major share or all of it must belong to the mother.
 
Based on what? The life is only "innocent" until it is capable of choosing to disobey the parents. So if innocence is all you care about, you probably have no interest in what the future baby does after birth. To care about the new life at all you have to care about more than the fact that before birth, it is unable to sin, because after being born, soon it will become a sinner.

I don’t know of anyone in the pro-life movement who supports murder after birth.
 
Ninety percent of the males that post on the abortion site are rabidly anti-abortion. They post statements about the law, women, abortion, pregnancy, fetuses that are simply untrue. They make accusations about women that are ignorant and rude. They ignore sourced material proving them to be lying and go right back to posting the same lies. They make up impossible situations then demand women defend themselves against these nonsense scenarios.

Why do they post here? They don't have a good grasp of the subject. Are they trying to scold women into abandoning the pro-choice position? Teach them who is boss. Shame shame women into obedience?


Anti-abortion men; what's your purpose for being on this thread?

I am attracted to arguing political and moral issues on this site.

I don’t think your sex is connected to the correctness of your opinion.

However if you go to an in person pro-life event you’ll see the people with the most passion for the issue are usually Latina and Filipino women.
 
I don’t know of anyone in the pro-life movement who supports murder after birth.

Does anyone on the anti-choice side care about the baby's life after it is born? Is only its mere existence important to them?

Pro-choicers care about what would happen to unwanted babies if they could not be cared for properly. I never saw this concern from a pro-lifer.
 
Does anyone on the anti-choice side care about the baby's life after it is born? Is only its mere existence important to them?

Yes. Everyone in the pro-life movement.
 
Yet we have had a few who would support the death penalty. Which kind of discounts what you know.

The death penalty is not murder.

There is no moral construction which makes the death penalty per se murder. Civil authorities have the obligation to protect the public peace and to punish offenses against such. You as the individual have no such prerogative to wantonly cause another’s death
 
The death penalty is not murder.

There is no moral construction which makes the death penalty per se murder. Civil authorities have the obligation to protect the public peace and to punish offenses against such. You as the individual have no such prerogative to wantonly cause another’s death

Abortion is not murder.

A woman has every right to say what happens to her body just as you do and as pro lifers would take that right from her.
 
The death penalty is not murder.

There is no moral construction which makes the death penalty per se murder. Civil authorities have the obligation to protect the public peace and to punish offenses against such. You as the individual have no such prerogative to wantonly cause another’s death

Abortion is obviously not murder either. All pregnant citizens have the constitutional right to end their pregnancies.
 
So... how many abortions take place 1 minute before the innocent life is born?
The same number as the number of death row inmates who are executed 1 minute before they successfully escape prison.
 
Abortion is obviously not murder either. All pregnant citizens have the constitutional right to end their pregnancies.

The constitution to the extent it authorizes murder is wrong and I do not accept the constitution as a sufficient argument to establish morality
 
Back
Top Bottom