• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The “KILL IT”� Party strikes again

Digger said:
Great. Tell me the time stamp. I missed them.
Click to expand...

You'll have to watch the video.

Why is this an issue for you? Arent you happy about your support of killing the unborn? Not sure why you and others feel the need to make this an issue.
 
VanceMack said:
You'll have to watch the video.

Why is this an issue for you? Arent you happy about your support of killing the unborn? Not sure why you and others feel the need to make this an issue.
Click to expand...

I watched the video. I didn't see any happy people except at 3:21 someone made a joke and a couple people laughed. Is that what you're talking about? Please tell me where all the happy people are. If you could point out five smiles at five different time stamps on your video, that would be great.
 
Digger said:
I watched the video. I didn't see any happy people except at 3:21 someone made a joke and a couple people laughed. Is that what you're talking about? Please tell me where all the happy people are. If you could point out five smiles at five different time stamps on your video, that would be great.
Click to expand...
You have a dance you apparently want to do...so do it baby.

Arent YOU happy with your support of killing the unborn?
 
VanceMack said:
You have a dance you apparently want to do...so do it baby.

Arent YOU happy with your support of killing the unborn?
Click to expand...

I'm just pointing out that you can't point out any happy people on that video. You can stop the dance any time you want by pointing some out.
 
VanceMack said:
You fund it and celebrate the practice. You cheer on the slaughter of 800,000 unborn children every year. Dont get salty about it. Its OK. All I'm saying is its pretty pathetic that people that cheerfully and joyously support the mass slaughter of the unborn pretend to be poutraged because a guy told one of his employees to kill her unborn baby because it would get in the way of business.
Click to expand...

Its sad how this stupid argument lives on.
Democrats support the access to a wide range of contraceptives and comprehensive sex ed, the two most effective ways to stop abortions.
Republicans support criminalizing abortions which does not stop them, and making those things harder to get, causing more of them.

Thus, it is the Republicans who cause more abortions.

You're barking up the wrong tree.
 
zimmer said:
Because they “love the children... and if they survive an abortion... it’s not a life... it’s still a choice.

Either the kids lives, or they’re chopped up and sold as McDemocrat Parts. Flip the coin... how compassionate. How humane.

Odd they complain about Bloomy. The Democrat Partei is the “KILL IT” Party for decades.

Mengele would be proud.
Click to expand...

No kid is chopped up like a burger. Read about chemical abortions, which are basically forced miscarriages, and embryonic abortions that happen before a body exists.
 
zimmer said:
Because they “love the children... and if they survive an abortion... it’s not a life... it’s still a choice.

Either the kids lives, or they’re chopped up and sold as McDemocrat Parts. Flip the coin... how compassionate. How humane.

Odd they complain about Bloomy. The Democrat Partei is the “KILL IT” Party for decades.

Mengele would be proud.
Click to expand...

Godwin's Law.

And there is already a Born Alive act. Another one isn't needed.
 
VanceMack said:
Whole lot of people really happy about killing babies.

But look...I'm not sure what point you think you are making. This is a 100% rat party cause. You ARE pro slaughter...and you should be proud of that. DOnt know why you are so twisted about that. And again...this isnt about abortion...this is about Lizzies hypocrisy. How are you going to pretend to give a **** that Mikey told a woman to kill a baby in the name of business when she advocates for the slaughter of 800,000+ a year in the name of convenience?
Click to expand...

Nobody advocates "for the slaughter of 800,000+ a year in the name of convenience". Stop lying.
 
Scrabaholic said:
Nobody advocates "for the slaughter of 800,000+ a year in the name of convenience". Stop lying.
Click to expand...

That's his bumper sticker...it's all he has, a mindless, false slogan.
 
Digger said:
I'm just pointing out that you can't point out any happy people on that video. You can stop the dance any time you want by pointing some out.
Click to expand...
We disagree. I see a video full of happy people, as they should be. As YOU should. As Liz should be. She just shouldnt be a hypocrite and pretend to be poutraged because Bloomberg told someone to kill a baby in the name of business.
 
j brown's body said:
Its sad how this stupid argument lives on.
Democrats support the access to a wide range of contraceptives and comprehensive sex ed, the two most effective ways to stop abortions.
Republicans support criminalizing abortions which does not stop them, and making those things harder to get, causing more of them.

Thus, it is the Republicans who cause more abortions.

You're barking up the wrong tree.
Click to expand...
I dont know why you keep making it then. You DO cheerfully support the slaughter of 800,000+ unborn babies a year. Its not even a question.
 
VanceMack said:
I dont know why you keep making it then. You DO cheerfully support the slaughter of 800,000+ unborn babies a year. Its not even a question.
Click to expand...

Yeah its great
 
zimmer said:
Because they “love the children... and if they survive an abortion... it’s not a life... it’s still a choice.

Either the kids lives, or they’re chopped up and sold as McDemocrat Parts. Flip the coin... how compassionate. How humane.

Odd they complain about Bloomy. The Democrat Partei is the “KILL IT” Party for decades.

Mengele would be proud.
Click to expand...

Huh??
 
VanceMack said:
Frankly I thought Warrens poutrage over Bloombergs 'kill it' comment is completely ridiculous. This is a party that cheers on the slaughter of 800,000 unborn children every year including and up to live birth abortions. So her attacks on that front are pretty pathetic.
Click to expand...

It's called selective outrage. Warren with her crazy bag lady like eyes and flailing arms accused Bloomberg of having suggested a woman have an abortion. Because to the loony left progressives a "choice" is the greater good than an actual life.

But Warren's attack failed as Bloomberg stood his ground. Warren's star is fading fast---soon to be passed by Bloomberg, and that is why she pulled that desperate move.
 
Scrabaholic said:
Nobody advocates "for the slaughter of 800,000+ a year in the name of convenience". Stop lying.
Click to expand...
Of course you do. What I find fascinating is your need to pretend you dont. But I really have no desire to have this discussion again...its boring. This wasnt about your celebration of abortion...it is about Liz Warrens hypocrisy.
 
zimmer said:
I think it’s time to give them the label... the “KILL IT” Party.

Short... memorable and accurate.
Click to expand...

It is memorable for Elizabeth Warren saying, "At least I did not have a boss who told me to 'kill it' like Michael Bloomberg . . ." referring to a lawsuit against him that included the accusation he said that phrase before firing a pregnant woman. Warren was mad for a personal reason, having been pregnant at age 21. Democcrats obviously are not the "kill it" party because they want their babies to be born and get mad if supervisors tell them to have abortions.
 
VanceMack said:
We disagree. I see a video full of happy people, as they should be. As YOU should. As Liz should be. She just shouldnt be a hypocrite and pretend to be poutraged because Bloomberg told someone to kill a baby in the name of business.
Click to expand...

Are you saying Elizabeth should have kept her mouth shut about Mike Bloomberg telling his pregnant employee to "kill it" to make hiis job more important than a helpless human being?
 
j brown's body said:
Its sad how this stupid argument lives on.
Democrats support the access to a wide range of contraceptives and comprehensive sex ed, the two most effective ways to stop abortions.
Republicans support criminalizing abortions which does not stop them, and making those things harder to get, causing more of them.

Thus, it is the Republicans who cause more abortions.

You're barking up the wrong tree.
Click to expand...

True. The best formula for addressing the issue is the "safe, legal, and rare" theme the Clintons proposed. My wife and I terminated a pregnancy. The child had a deformity that would have killed her in the womb. We had a ceremony with friends, moderated by a former Catholic priest, and planted a tree in her memory. Two questions for pro-lifers: what hoops would you have had us jump through to have the procedure done? And when Trump says we should kill the families of terrorists, have you suggested that our pro life Prez should spare those family members who are pregnant?
 
Blue Donkey said:
Are you saying Elizabeth should have kept her mouth shut about Mike Bloomberg telling his pregnant employee to "kill it" to make hiis job more important than a helpless human being?
Click to expand...
I'm saying she should dispense with the pretense poutrage. Its all political theater and considering her support of the slaughterhouses of millions of unborn babies, completely hypocritical. And her lie about her getting fired for being pregnant was already exposed previously.
 
VanceMack said:
We disagree. I see a video full of happy people, as they should be. As YOU should. As Liz should be. She just shouldnt be a hypocrite and pretend to be poutraged because Bloomberg told someone to kill a baby in the name of business.
Click to expand...

Whatever man. Happy people smile. Point out five different smiles and you win a prize.

EDIT : Oh, I found one at 3:48. She snuck by without me noticing on the first watch but I noticed this time. You'd better find your five before I find them, or they don't count.

How long do you think it will take me to find five scowls? Happy people don't scowl.

EDIT : 1:05 someone smiles, but she is initially scowling, and then flashes a fake smile for the camera as a reflex. I don't think it counts.

1:10 someone on the right edge of the screen does seem very happy. I found one!

1:25 mid ground. Oh, that person is pissed! Not happy.

EDIT :

1:38 center foreground looks completely miserable. But it looks like it's a personal issue. Some happy people in the mid ground. It appears to be a pleasurable social interaction.

I see a lot of mixed emotions. Anger, sadness, righteous indignation. Along with a smattering of the normal emotions you'd expect to see in any crowd over the course of a march.

I hear a lot of angry chanting and some exuberant yelling. Most people aren't talking. Those who are are mostly subdued. There are occasional off topic social interactions that involve happiness.

I haven't seen anyone in that video who is identifiably happy about abortions. Tell you what, since you see people who are happy about abortion everywhere, how about you point one out to me? Then I can see what you see. And if I deny it, observers of our conversation can look for themselves and you'll win some people over.
 
Last edited:
Digger said:
Whatever man. Happy people smile. Point out five different smiles and you win a prize.

EDIT : Oh, I found one at 3:48. She snuck by without me noticing on the first watch but I noticed this time. You'd better find your five before I find them, or they don't count.

How long do you think it will take me to find five scowls? Happy people don't scowl.

EDIT : 1:05 someone smiles, but she is initially scowling, and then flashes a fake smile for the camera as a reflex. I don't think it counts.

1:10 someone on the right edge of the screen does seem very happy. I found one!

1:25 mid ground. Oh, that person is pissed! Not happy.

EDIT :

1:38 center foreground looks completely miserable. But it looks like it's a personal issue. Some happy people in the mid ground. It appears to be a pleasurable social interaction.

I see a lot of mixed emotions. Anger, sadness, righteous indignation. Along with a smattering of the normal emotions you'd expect to see in any crowd over the course of a march.

I hear a lot of angry chanting and some exuberant yelling. Most people aren't talking. Those who are are mostly subdued. There are occasional off topic social interactions that involve happiness.

I haven't seen anyone in that video who is identifiably happy about abortions. Tell you what, since you see people who are happy about abortion everywhere, how about you point one out to me? Then I can see what you see. And if I deny it, observers of our conversation can look for themselves and you'll win some people over.
Click to expand...
Lots of happy people. YOU support abortion dont you? And arent you happy about it?
 
I’m a little confused about the position you’re taking. You seem to recognise that the law is unnecessary yet are still defending it.

Lursa said:
There are no failed abortions, for the reasons I gave you. If there are, where is the data? How many? How often?
Click to expand...
I agree it’s an extremely rare situation which is why there is the fear that the actual reason for the law is intimidation. Just having a charge brought against them could be highly damaged even if it doesn’t go any further.

Lursa said:
And why wouldnt the same laws apply to this as to the preemies and other newborns?
Click to expand...
I linked the actual bill for a reason. It specifically refers to abortions and so couldn’t (legally) be applied in any other circumstances.

Lursa said:
If anything, this legislation is clarifying the current laws. (Why it's needed, I dont know. I have seen zero cases that this law is based on)
Click to expand...
How can it clarify other laws when it doesn’t reference them. It is entirely new legalisation setting out specific new offences with specific new penalties. Having more laws about the same thing isn’t better, it’s worse. If the existing legalisation needed clarifying, it should be by amendments to those laws, not the introduction of something new and distinct.

It’s like having laws that says driving above the posted speed limit on any public highway is illegal and laying out a range of penalties based on the circumstances but then bringing in a new bill that states motorbikes going over 55mph on a specific stretch of highway is illegal and carries a $500 fine. That isn’t clarification, it is just additional and unnecessary complication and if it was raised by people who were also campaigning to have motorbikes banned, it would be legitimately suspicious.
 
Blue Donkey said:
It is memorable for Elizabeth Warren saying, "At least I did not have a boss who told me to 'kill it' like Michael Bloomberg . . ." referring to a lawsuit against him that included the accusation he said that phrase before firing a pregnant woman. Warren was mad for a personal reason, having been pregnant at age 21. Democcrats obviously are not the "kill it" party because they want their babies to be born and get mad if supervisors tell them to have abortions.
Click to expand...

The Democrat Party is the party of KILL IT...

And Pocahontas lied as usual. There is ample evidence she lied about getting fired... in her own words and documentation.

But Pocahontas is a nothing in this race... so it’ll only matter in her next Senate run.
 
VanceMack said:
Lots of happy people. YOU support abortion dont you? And arent you happy about it?
Click to expand...

Great. If there are lots of happy people, you should be able to point out 5 different smiles at 5 different time stamps.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom