• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Abortion Clinic Volunteer Claims Rape by Abortion Doctor: Surprise! These Aren't Nice People.

See this is what I love about self-righteous types like Mash.

They're against abortion which they claim is immoral, and even go as far to say that it's murder and want to make criminals out of women and their doctors who partake in it.

Then they take it a step further and claim that even birth control is immoral. Excuse me? Using contraception is about the most responsible thing a person can do to prevent STD and unwanted pregnancies.

So this means that either -
1. So-called moralists view sex as something not for pleasure but only for procreation. If this is the case then they must be popping out babies all over the place. Now we all know that raising children is expensive so there's really no way the vast majority of people can have a large family without getting some kind of assistance from the government.

2. So-called moralists are really closest fags or pedophiles, and are so outraged by their own abnormality that they express their disgust at gays, and lash out at anyone who is pro-choice and-or supports the use of contraception.

3. So-called moralists are really sexless all together and abstain completely from any kind of intimacy. I find this really hard to believe but I suppose there are a few individuals with severe ED that they've lost interest in sex, or they're so repulsive that nobody would find them attractive.

Based on the amount of free time Mash has to post on here practically every minute of the day, I'd say he either fits in category #2 or #3.

Mash will take the high road on the personal insults, and just say I oppose abortion because it is obviously the killing of a child. And yes, I think women and doctors who kill children should be prosecuted. Birth control is immoral because it denies the possibility of procreating AND removes the sharing that intimacy is supposed to provide. It treats sex as purely a mechanical act, and objectifies women. My wife and I have never used birth control at any time during our 32 marriage, and our marriage is stronger than ever.
 
The hospitals would go under without the government. Face you depend on the damned government for health care, at least if you need to be hospitalized.

BTW, from prior posts it seems like you are old enough for medicare….do you also partake in medicare?

Nope. I may be forced to pay into it with my taxes, but I'm not using 0bummercare at all.
 
Another day another silly thread by Mash devoid of logic

Sorry if I have offended you leftwing atheists. Actually, I'm not sorry. Sometimes people need to be offended.
 
Looks like I did, judging by all your responses. Mashie hit the nail on the head.

Mashie didn't even hit close to the nail. He wasn't even nail adjacent.

You couldn't even hit close to the nail if this was your hammer

nail.jpg

In other words, you as always are

wrong-trump-1.jpg
 
The hospitals might use government, but not for me or my surgery.

Of course they do. The hospital keeps its doors open because of such funding. It keeps state of the art equipment because of this funding. It helps keep emergency rooms open and saving lives because many patients will not be able to pay . But of course you are using the government for your care. You just are not insured by them.....unless you are accepting medicare/Medicaid/etc
 
Mash will take the high road on the personal insults, and just say I oppose abortion because it is obviously the killing of a child. And yes, I think women and doctors who kill children should be prosecuted. Birth control is immoral because it denies the possibility of procreating AND removes the sharing that intimacy is supposed to provide. It treats sex as purely a mechanical act, and objectifies women. My wife and I have never used birth control at any time during our 32 marriage, and our marriage is stronger than ever.

Why doesnt it objectify men? What is the distinction there?

And if it's not a condom...now does bc 'remove sharing that intimacy?'
 
Mash will take the high road on the personal insults, and just say I oppose abortion because it is obviously the killing of a child. And yes, I think women and doctors who kill children should be prosecuted. Birth control is immoral because it denies the possibility of procreating AND removes the sharing that intimacy is supposed to provide. It treats sex as purely a mechanical act, and objectifies women. My wife and I have never used birth control at any time during our 32 marriage, and our marriage is stronger than ever.

It makes no sense to oppose both abortion and birth control.
 
Sorry if I have offended you leftwing atheists. Actually, I'm not sorry. Sometimes people need to be offended.

Not a left winger or an atheist but you are
Why would it upset me that you make a fool of yourself?
 
Not a left winger or an atheist but you are
Why would it upset me that you make a fool of yourself?

Right. I am a leftwing atheist. lol. I love seeing you people twist yourselves into a pretzel to try to get the best of Mashie.
 
Right. I am a leftwing atheist. lol. I love seeing you people twist yourselves into a pretzel to try to get the best of Mashie.

Well, nobody needs to try hard at all. You are always wrong so everybody can best Mashmont in every post.
 
Right. I am a leftwing atheist. lol. I love seeing you people twist yourselves into a pretzel to try to get the best of Mashie.

Oh, I don't think we will see anything resembling "best" from you.

No pretzel twisting here.

Now I did enjoy watching you dance around the fact that you will need the government for your health care if you are hospitalized. I mean unless you try to find a hospital that does not accept any government funding at all.
 
Right. I am a leftwing atheist. lol. I love seeing you people twist yourselves into a pretzel to try to get the best of Mashie.

No need to twist, all anyone has to do is let your posts do that all by themselves
 
No need to twist, all anyone has to do is let your posts do that all by themselves

Right!

The dude has no freaking life to post as often as he does here. I mean it would be a little different if his statements had any value, but they're all the same self-righteous, holier-than-thou crap. Only a fool would take him seriously.

He also watches chick flicks and calls himself Mashie. If that doesn't scream GAY, I don't know what does.
 
Sorry if I have offended you leftwing atheists. Actually, I'm not sorry. Sometimes people need to be offended.
You really think, no, I mean really believe that making an ass of yourself every time you post is offending someone?
 
Not a left winger or an atheist but you are
Why would it upset me that you make a fool of yourself?

It requires some credibility to have your opinion taken seriously. Or even paid attention to.
 
Looks like I did, judging by all your responses. Mashie hit the nail on the head.

I did not mean to hurt your feelings... sorry.
 
The difference is the way the Marxist media reports. By their stories, you would think every priests molests boys, simply because the media has an agenda against the Catholic Church. But we have shown sexual molestation incidents are hundreds of times higher in the government public school system, yet we have almost no stories on that.

So one can reasonably infer the media is hiding abuse in abortion clinics, since their mission is to promote and protect abortion. And again, these are not nice people in the baby-killing business by definition. Why would we expect them to be any different in other areas?

You can't reasonbly assume anything. All assumptions made up in your head with even the slightest hint of bias are totally unreasonable. If you want to paint with a broad brush, talk about big groups of women who were forced to be in this woman's position.
 
Last edited:
Willie Parker and the #MeToo Case That Split the Abortion-Rights Movement - The Atlantic

On March 25, 2019, the activist Candice Russell posted a 3,300-word essay on the website Medium... In prose that was by turns confusing and moving, Russell wrote that after a year and a half of casual texting and a handful of face-to-face meetups, she and Parker had met for dinner in Dallas in October 2016. She got drunk, while he, she discovered partway through the evening, stuck to tonic water and lime. Then they went back to his hotel room, where she continued to drink, and they had sex.

Russell did not write that she’d told Parker she didn’t want to sleep with him, but she strongly implied that, having downed “four martinis and an entire bottle of wine,” she was inebriated beyond any practical ability to consent. And, in a sweeping accusation that extended far beyond what had happened between the two of them in that hotel room, she called him a “predator.” She’d gradually learned, she wrote, that the way he’d treated her was part of a pattern. Rumors about his behavior swirled in “whispers [that] had become so loud they were more like shouts”—and unnamed movement leaders were refusing to expose him.


The leftwing media has presented the image that abortion workers and abortion doctors are just nice normal people championing a cause they believe in. But the reality, the abortion business is a nasty, vile, filthy business, and it's practitioners are nasty and vile too. Nice normal average people don't get into the killing business. So this story is no surprise. An abortion doctor who has zero respect for human life, by definition, will have zero qualms about treating a woman volunteer like a piece of disposable trash. It's also no great surprise an abortion activist who, by definition, has personal issues, would allow herself to get stinking drunk and consort with a doctor who kills babies. I suspect stories like this are FAR more common than the Soros-paid media lets on.

Women who believe in equality hire a "stripper" for the guy and go to sleep "on the couch".
 
An abortion doctor who has zero respect for human life, by definition, will have zero qualms about treating a woman volunteer like a piece of disposable trash.

Strange; I think hardline "prolife" guys, like yourself for example, treat women like pieces of disposable trash far more often than this one abortion doctor, simply by demanding that they be forced to stay pregnant and give birth.
 
And again, these are not nice people in the baby-killing business by definition. Why would we expect them to be any different in other areas?

I don't think of Catholic priests as nice people either. Which is why I stay as far away from them, and the Catholic Church, as I possibly can. I don't believe any pro-choicer has said that all abortion doctors are paragons of virtue. There are creeps in every profession.
 
Abortion doctors are usually the marginal questionable oddball doctors like that ghoul who collected baby-skeletons in his garage in Illinois.

So you believe. You do know that beliefs aren't facts, right?
 
She probably was driven to alcoholism from working at such a horrible place.

Or maybe the workplace wasn't the reason, and maybe Russell isn't an alcoholic at all. I think the level of "prolife" speculation here is ridiculous.
 
Kermit Gosnell was a lovely abortion doctor, wasn't he? So was Dr. Klopfer who stored the thousands baby corpses in his garage. Any doctor who kills children in the womb is ethically deficient, by definition. Upstanding doctors don't go near the abortion mills.

So according to this rather ridiculous statement, all abortion doctors are like these two? :roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom