• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump making fun of the disabled person.. that's egregious, right?

The bottom line is that all the "good" things Trump does or did are negated by his words and actions.
 
Here is an easy solution: If you want an abortion have one, if you do not don't. Let people have the free will God supposedly gave us and stop trying to interfere.
 
I can't help but notice that the members the most upset over Pres. Trump mocking Mr. Kovalevski are the same ones who mock Pres. Trump for his orange complexion, or Sen. McConnell for being a "turtle head".

As we all seem to regard such assaults as petty and unseemly, perhaps we ought to eschew their use. There's plenty to criticize without dragging physical characteristics into the mix.
 
I can't help but notice that the members the most upset over Pres. Trump mocking Mr. Kovalevski are the same ones who mock Pres. Trump for his orange complexion, or Sen. McConnell for being a "turtle head".

That orange complexion is chosen, it isn't his natural look. I've never heard of the latter happening.
 
Trump making fun of the disabled person.. that's egregious, right?



but at least Trump does not believe in KILLING him before he exits the womb....

Lame false equivalence.

Is that all you got?

How sad.
 
That orange complexion is chosen, it isn't his natural look. I've never heard of the latter happening.
Nobody knows the reason for the orange complexion. There's a dozen competing theories. And frankly, even if there is an element of choice in it, it's no different than mocking somebody for their hairstyle, gait, clothing, or headwear. People have no business mocking it, especially in civil discourse, which is what this board is supposed to be about.

I've never heard of the latter happening.
It's not as common as the orange jokes, but it's not uncommon.

When you see it for the first time: I told you so. :shrug:
 
Trump making fun of the disabled person.. that's egregious, right?



but at least Trump does not believe in KILLING him before he exits the womb....

Is Trump's supposed making fun of a disabled person as bad as Bloomberg's comment about throwing young black men up against a wall and frisking them because they are where all the crime lies in big cities?
 
Trump making fun of the disabled person.. that's egregious, right?



but at least Trump does not believe in KILLING him before he exits the womb....

No, just locking people up in cages and letting them die there.

God damn, right wingers post the dumbest ****ing ****

There is actually no evidence that Trump ever made fun of a disabled person. The arm-waving thing he did had nothing to do with the reporter's disability, which restricted his ability to move.

Here we have another one of those crazy myths that doesn't die, in spite of having no evidence.

And I doubt Trump is an anti-abortion fanatic, by the way.

oh look, more lies. Deplorables indeed
 
A refreshing change. A "leftist" using logic instead of raging emotion.

LOL, you people can't even post as complete paragraph, barely a complete sentence. YOu have no clue what logic is. You have no clue about anything.

When you people throw these insults, it just validates liberals more about how deplorable and stupid right wingers are
 
I can't help but notice that the members the most upset over Pres. Trump mocking Mr. Kovalevski are the same ones who mock Pres. Trump for his orange complexion, or Sen. McConnell for being a "turtle head".

As we all seem to regard such assaults as petty and unseemly, perhaps we ought to eschew their use. There's plenty to criticize without dragging physical characteristics into the mix.
Oh look, more what aboutism. So predictable every stupid thing a right winger will say. McConnell is not disabled. And posters here are not the President of the United States. and McConnell is a hateful POS.
 
Oh look, more what aboutism. So predictable every stupid thing a right winger will say.
Tu quoque (i.e. "whataboutism") is attempting to defend one person's misconduct by deferring to somebody else's.

I'm not defending Pres. Trump's misconduct. My post clearly states that I "regard such assaults as petty and unseemly", which includes Pres. Trump's mocking Mr. Kovalevski.

However, none of us can change Pres. Trump's conduct. We can only amend our own conduct. This is the change we can make in the world. Hence it's worth pointing out to one's peers that they may be guilty of the same misconduct we all disapprove of in Pres. Trump.

McConnell is not disabled.
Irrelevant.

And posters here are not the President of the United States.
Also irrelevant.

and McConnell is a hateful POS.
Also also irrelevant.
 
Back
Top Bottom