• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W: 1134] Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

You felt the need to be mean why?

Such belittlement is also a sin.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Nope, in all those lists that are posted about women's reasons, not a single one is 'convenience.' All are socio-economically based.

Let's see a legit list where it says 'convenience?'

Well, of course women aren't going to admit most abortions are for convenience. That would make them sound like hideous people. Nor will they give as a reason to have an abortion: "Because i'm a slut who wants to keep having irresponsible sex".
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

"In domestic infant adoption, there is not a shortage of adoptive families"
Is There a Shortage of Adoptive Families in the US?

When will these leftwingers learn: you do NOT challenge Mashmont on facts.

Where did it say that? And what you are ignoring is that for every 'imperfect non-white newborn' there are thousands still waiting for homes. There is no shortage for the perfect ones...and all the non-perfect ones get thrown into that giant pool, actually waiting and hoping, even suffering.

And for every newborn that does get adopted, it means one of those older kids gets passed over.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Yes it did make a distinction. It was called the 'pro-choice' category. The majority of women rejected that category and chose the pro-life position.

Again, you are ignoring...willfully out of convenience...that women dont always make the distinction between themselves and other women from that generic polling question.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Well, of course women aren't going to admit most abortions are for convenience. That would make them sound like hideous people. Nor will they give as a reason to have an abortion: "Because i'm a slut who wants to keep having irresponsible sex".

OK, so then you are lying about them having abortions out of convenience? You made it up? Otherwise...where is the proof?
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I don't know why these guys feel the need to be mean. Calling me unchristian, etc. Let's see if they answer you. I doubt they will.

They must feel you act unchristian. Now I am an atheist, I know pretty much nothing about fantasy figures from the bible. But the others might have a bit more knowledge and feel you don t represent the new testament/christ/new direction of new testament.

You, from what you have voice are more an old testament kinda of guy, not interested in what women want, what men want in your book is the only thing that counts.

Problem for you have is that you do not respect the fact that we live in the 21st century. Women not only have a mind of their own but also will decide if they marry, who they marry, when they marry and if /how many children they want to have and make sure that they can make that happen.

Women do not need permission from men like, well, men like you who think that women should close their legs and obey your commands, live by your morality.

The fact is that Roe v. Wade is important but 40 years ago scrapping it would be very important. If Roe v. Wade would be limited, abortion will still continue to happen. Maybe not in some states but other states will still allow it and the republican party will be punished electorally by women and men who think the Repubs have no business in a woman's personal decision making process. But abortions will still take place. Women can just travel to a state that still allows abortion and you cannot stop it. The abortion clinics will open in such a manner that women have to travel the least distance.

Abortion will continue and the political fall out for the republicans will be massive. Nobody likes the concept of abortion but people like the concept of stealing women's rights even less.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I don't know why these guys feel the need to be mean. Calling me unchristian, etc. Let's see if they answer you. I doubt they will.

I'll answer....Maybe you should think about that post you made about Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg being a 'Marxist hag' whom you are waiting with baited breath to 'croak.' Then maybe, just maybe, you won't be so dumbfounded as to why other's question you're particular brand of 'Christianity. ' Do you not think that post contained meanness' within it ?
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I've been married for 32 years, champ. How about you?

My husband and I have been happily married for over 45 years.

He is the love of my life.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

She doesnt have to. She can still enjoy sex, use birth control, and have the responsible option of abortion if she needs it.

And it's not a lie about the kids up for adoption:

"Waiting for a family is the longest wait of all."

Adopt America Network | Children for Adoption

Adoption Statistics | Adoption Network

Waiting Children | Kids Available for Adoption | The Adoption Exchange | The Adoption Exchange

So you are wrong once again.

I was reading a very sad article yesterday.

’We are just destroying these kids’: The foster children growing up inside detention centers

being a foster child in an era when a surging number of biological parents are falling into the grips of drug addiction and child welfare systems are struggling with a shortage of foster parents. In hasty attempts to address the problem, case workers and courts have been funneling children into crowded emergency shelters, hotels, out-of-state institutions and youth prisons — cold, isolating and often dangerous facilities not built to house innocent children for years.

“We are just destroying these kids. They’re warehoused into emergency shelters, out-of-state institutions and juvenile detention centers, which can cause lifelong emotional trauma — their childhoods spent segregated from the outside world,”
said Marcia Lowry, executive director of A Better Childhood (ABC), a nonprofit child advocacy organization.



Read more:

‘We are just destroying these kids’: The foster children growing up inside detention centers | The fosters, Foster care, Foster parenting
 
Last edited:
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

"In domestic infant adoption, there is not a shortage of adoptive families"
Is There a Shortage of Adoptive Families in the US?

When will these leftwingers learn: you do NOT challenge Mashmont on facts.

If you want facts.

Adoption is not an alternative to gestating a pregnancy and giving childbirth.

Adoption is an alternative to not racing a baby/ child after it has been born.

Only about 1 percent of the women in the United States give their newborn up for adoption and many of those are special needs babies.

In fact in the United States most adoption agencies will not even discuss with a pregnant woman about putting up her unborn for adoption until the last trimester which is past the time she could choose an elective abortion.
 
Last edited:
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

My husband and I have been happily married for over 45 years.

He is the love of my life.

:2dance::2dance:
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

My husband and I have been happily married for over 45 years.

He is the love of my life.

I was addressing the leftwing guy who said I was insecure about women. He must think you're even more insecure about men.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

If you want facts.

Adoption is not an alternative to gestating a pregnancy and giving childbirth.

Adoption is an alternative to not racing a baby/ child after it has been born.

Only about 1 percent of the women in the United States give their newborn up for adoption and many of those are special needs babies.

In fact in the United States most adoption agencies will not even discuss with a pregnant woman about putting up her unborn for adoption until the last trimester which is past the time she could choose an elective abortion.

I don't know what point your statistics are supposed to prove. Adoption agencies want women to raise their children if at all possible. I say that's a very positive thing if they want women to take responsibility. Bless those wonderful families who adopt. We adopted four children, three of them special needs.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.


Yes, drug abuse by parents is a real shame, and just which party is it who is pushing legalization of gateway drugs like marijuana? Democrats. These are the people who have done more to destroy the family in the past 80 years than any group.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I'll answer....Maybe you should think about that post you made about Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg being a 'Marxist hag' whom you are waiting with baited breath to 'croak.' Then maybe, just maybe, you won't be so dumbfounded as to why other's question you're particular brand of 'Christianity. ' Do you not think that post contained meanness' within it ?

Ginsburg is an evil woman. Her rulings have ensured the deaths of many children through abortion. Do you think those who waited for the demise of Hitler or Stalin were "mean" as well?
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

They must feel you act unchristian. Now I am an atheist, I know pretty much nothing about fantasy figures from the bible. But the others might have a bit more knowledge and feel you don t represent the new testament/christ/new direction of new testament.

You, from what you have voice are more an old testament kinda of guy, not interested in what women want, what men want in your book is the only thing that counts.

Problem for you have is that you do not respect the fact that we live in the 21st century. Women not only have a mind of their own but also will decide if they marry, who they marry, when they marry and if /how many children they want to have and make sure that they can make that happen.

Women do not need permission from men like, well, men like you who think that women should close their legs and obey your commands, live by your morality.

The fact is that Roe v. Wade is important but 40 years ago scrapping it would be very important. If Roe v. Wade would be limited, abortion will still continue to happen. Maybe not in some states but other states will still allow it and the republican party will be punished electorally by women and men who think the Repubs have no business in a woman's personal decision making process. But abortions will still take place. Women can just travel to a state that still allows abortion and you cannot stop it. The abortion clinics will open in such a manner that women have to travel the least distance.

Abortion will continue and the political fall out for the republicans will be massive. Nobody likes the concept of abortion but people like the concept of stealing women's rights even less.

1. If you think I act unchristian, and you are unchristian, then you must think I act like you.
3. You say I'm not interested in 'what women want' yet the majority of women agree with ME. Therefore you are not interested in what women want.
3. What is moral now was moral 10, 100, 1000 years ago. God did not change His mind on abortion.
4. The GOP will be rewarded politicially if it undose Roe, since most people in the US are pro-life. You never pay a long-term price for doing the right thing.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Ginsburg is an evil woman. Her rulings have ensured the deaths of many children through abortion. Do you think those who waited for the demise of Hitler or Stalin were "mean" as well?

Who were the 9 sitting SCOTUS members who decided Roe. vs. Wade ? What were their names, their respective political lean, and how did each of those 9 SCOTUS members vote on RvW ? Your silly last question is irrelevant to my question, and therefore will be ignored and dismissed a failed diversion ploy. Now you can provide links to support your positive claim Ginsburg is 'evil', and her rulings have' ensured the of many children', which is also asinine claim, as killing 'children' is illegal in the U.S., or have those postive claims summarily dismissed due to inability to meet Burden of Proof.
 
Last edited:
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Hey guys, look. I've been around a long time. I've seen and know what women want. I've learned by trial and error. And I can tell you women want men who act like men. They want men to care for them and their children. They want men who are responsible. Now the media has given men the illusion that women want men who push the 'lefwing ideals' of ERA and abortion, etc, gun control, free unemcumbered sex, and demise of the family. The Marxist media has pushed the idea that women like men who act like ******s, and trust me, they don't. You men who have bought into that have been duped by the Marxists in positions of influence in the media, government, and education. You've bought a lie. You leftwing men wonder why you don't have women in your lives, and that's why.
 
Last edited:
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Who were the 9 sitting SCOTUS members who decided Roe. vs. Wade ? What were their names, their respective political lean, and how did each of those 9 SCOTUS members vote on RvW ? Your silly last question is irrelevant to my question, and therefore will be ignored and dismissed a failed diversion ploy. Now you can provide links to support your positive claim Ginsburg is 'evil', and her rulings have' ensured the of many children', which is also asinine claim, as killing 'children' is illegal in the U.S.

You think Roe has been the only abortion ruling? You're mistaken. Ginsburg has ruled on the baby-killing side in all of her decisions on the issue.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Hey guys, look. I've been around a long time. I've seen and know what women want. I've learned by trial and error. And I can tell you women want men who act like men. They want men to care for them and their children. They want men who are responsible. Now the media has given men the illusion that women want men who push the 'lefwing ideals' of ERA and abortion, etc, gun control, free unemcumbered sex, and demise of the family. The Marxist media has pushed the idea that women like men who act like ******s, and trust me, they don't. You who men who have bought into that have been duped by the Marxists in positions of influence in the media, government, and education. You've bought a lie. You leftwing men wonder why you don't have women in your lives, and that's why.

Prove the media is Marxist with factual, verifiable, unbiased links...or that silly claim will also be summarily dismissed due to inability to meet Burden of Proof. ( Debating 101 )
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

You think Roe has been the only abortion ruling? You're mistaken. Ginsburg has ruled on the baby-killing side in all of her decisions on the issue.

Answering a question with a question is always an excellent path to take if losing a debate is one's goal. And you haven't proved any of your positive claims regarding Ginsburg.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Answering a question with a question is always an excellent path to take if losing a debate is one's goal. And you haven't proved any of your positive claims regarding Ginsburg.

I suggest you do your own research on Ginsburg if you have questions.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I suggest you do your own research on Ginsburg if you have questions.

I suggest you meet your burden of proof regarding your asinine positive claims you attribute to Ginsburg, lest those positive claims be summarily dismissed due to inability to meet burden of proof. ( Debating 101 )
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I suggest you meet your burden of proof regarding your asinine positive claims you attribute to Ginsburg, lest those positive claims be summarily dismissed due to inability to meet burden of proof. ( Debating 101 )

Isn't there somebody else you can troll this morning?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom