• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W: 1134] Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Women who got pregnant already made their choice. You make your choice before you spread your legs. After you make your choice comes the time to be responsible about that choice. Abortion is the height of irresponsibility, aside from it being evil.

That is more of your typical pro-life nonsense I see. It is not pregnancy that is their choice it is the freedom of choice of whether to remain pregnant or not.

And again, it is none of your effing business what women do with their vagina. How difficult is it for some men to understand they have no dominion over women or their behavior. It might have been the norm for people 50 of 500 years ago, but thankfully we are not living in the idiot age anymore where men could order women around.

Abortion can be the height of utter responsibility and again, it is not your moral view that matters in the choices women make.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

That is more of your typical pro-life nonsense I see. It is not pregnancy that is their choice it is the freedom of choice of whether to remain pregnant or not.

And again, it is none of your effing business what women do with their vagina. How difficult is it for some men to understand they have no dominion over women or their behavior. It might have been the norm for people 50 of 500 years ago, but thankfully we are not living in the idiot age anymore where men could order women around.

Abortion can be the height of utter responsibility and again, it is not your moral view that matters in the choices women make.

Actually, 100 years hence, people will wonder how we could have been so barbaric as to allow wholesale baby-slaughter. Much as we look back today and wonder how people justify slavery
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Women who got pregnant already made their choice. You make your choice before you spread your legs. After you make your choice comes the time to be responsible about that choice. Abortion is the height of irresponsibility, aside from it being evil.

Are you excluding the man from this choice? Is it incumbent solely upon the woman to prevent a pregnancy? Isn't that inherently a shared responsibility?
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Are you excluding the man from this choice? Is it incumbent solely upon the woman to prevent a pregnancy? Isn't that inherently a shared responsibility?

Well, for three days, I have been told it's the woman's decision only. Funny now how you don't want it to be women's sole responsibility. Can't have it both ways.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

There is just no way to sanitize or sterilize the grisly bloody slaughter of an innocent baby. All the sterlile clinical language in the world won't do it.


There is no way to sanitize the grizzly, bloody, mess of a hip replacement. All the sterile clinical language in to world won't take away the smell of the saw cutting bone and the feel of the hammer pounding the spike of the new joint into existing bone.

And, all the maudlin language in the world is not going to make abortion any messier, more bloody, more horrific procedure than any other operation.

There are many legitimate and sound reasons to control and limit abortion. Pretending that abortion is messy is not one of them.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Do you think your fake outrage over my words will cover for your view that little babies should be literally dismembered in the womb?

A fetus is not legally a 'baby' until the child is born.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

There is no way to sanitize the grizzly, bloody, mess of a hip replacement. All the sterile clinical language in to world won't take away the smell of the saw cutting bone and the feel of the hammer pounding the spike of the new joint into existing bone.

And, all the maudlin language in the world is not going to make abortion any messier, more bloody, more horrific procedure than any other operation.

There are many legitimate and sound reasons to control and limit abortion. Pretending that abortion is messy is not one of them.

That's silly as hell, comparing a grisly murder of a baby to a hip replacement.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Well, for three days, I have been told it's the woman's decision only. Funny now how you don't want it to be women's sole responsibility. Can't have it both ways.

It's that man's choice to have two testicles or one. If he want's one of them removed - go for it, it's his body.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

A fetus is not legally a 'baby' until the child is born.

'Baby' isn't a legal term at all. Who said I had to use legal terms?
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

'Baby' isn't a legal term at all. Who said I had to use legal terms?

Because psychologically, using the term "baby" referring to a non-born fetus, is only done to dramatize your argument that women shouldn't have a choice about what they do with their own bodies.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Linking these supposed threads where you supposedly converted people is not anything personal.

Man up and either give it up or admit you have nothing.

In another thread, he claimed that the Nobel Prize committee are all Marxists and that all left-wingers are poor. I asked for proof of these claims. Answer came there none. That is why he always loses debates.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

That's silly as hell, comparing a grisly murder of a baby to a hip replacement.

Did you ignore the main point of the post on purpose?

Intelligent people working to reduce the abortion rate in the US don't use your sort of purile and prurient language to address women and abortion. Conservative males with fake religious scruples, whose real agenda is to denigrate and deny women the right to privacy are the people that use language like yours. You obviously are not interested in reducing the rate of abortion in the US.
 
Last edited:
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

We damn well WILL take it up with SCOTUS. In the very near future. Preferably after the hateful Marxist hag Ginsburg croaks.

Prove Ginsburg is a ' hateful Marxist hag'...I would also remind you Trump begged the mother of his daughter, Tiffany, to abort that daughter. Chew on that one for a while.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Did you ignore the main point of the post on purpose?

Intelligent people working to reduce the abortion rate in the US don't use your sort of purile and prurient language to address women and abortion. Conservative males with fake religious scruples, whose real agenda is to denigrate and deny women the right to privacy are the people that use language like yours. You obviously are not interested in reducing the rate of abortion in the US.

yes, yes he did
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Women who got pregnant already made their choice. You make your choice before you spread your legs. After you make your choice comes the time to be responsible about that choice. Abortion is the height of irresponsibility, aside from it being evil.

Sez who? I make the choice when I have sex (and I can and do have it with my legs closed at times - it's very erotic) that if my precautions fail, I will abort.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

There is just no way to sanitize or sterilize the grisly bloody slaughter of an innocent baby. All the sterlile clinical language in the world won't do it.

Please try to keep up. You were claiming abortion is not a medical procedure. I was showing that it is.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

According to Merriam Webster, babies include the unborn
Your link did not say that.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Do you think your fake outrage over my words will cover for your view that little babies should be literally dismembered in the womb?

Yet another remark that shows you know fudge all about abortion. 66% of abortions take place before week 8 of gestation. Meaning the fetus is the size of a blueberry. Meaning your idiotic remark of dismembering is just ludicrous. Nobody needs to dismember the ZEF when it is the size of a blueberry.

The next almost 15% take place when the fetus is between the size of a raspberry and a kumquat. At that moment the fetus is 1.22 inches. Which is about half the average size of a woman's thumb. No dismembering needed.

Almost 90% of abortions have taken place before the fetus is the size of a plumb. Even then it is less than the average thumb.

"Dismembering" fetuses almost only happens in late abortions and then the fetus is either not viable or the life of the mother is at risk. You are just talking nonsense because you are clueless about the process of abortion. Quell Surprise.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Peter King is correct.


An unborn is human but it is not recognized by law in the US code as a human being until after it’s birth.

U.S. Code § 8. “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”


(a)In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
(b)As used in this section, the term “born alive”, with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion.

I posted that for her too...and it was not even acknowledged.

This is how she avoided it:

"Human=Homo sapiens, having human DNA". That is the logical definition. The rest has likely been changed for this abortion crazy world.

The US Code of Law was apparently the result of an 'abortion crazy world' :roll:
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Actually, 100 years hence, people will wonder how we could have been so barbaric as to allow wholesale baby-slaughter. Much as we look back today and wonder how people justify slavery

There is no baby slaughter, that this is in your twisted mind as the truth does not make it accurate. You are just posting pro-life lies time and time again.

And there was no justification of slavery, there never was. There is however perfect justification for allowing women their constitutional rights.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Women who got pregnant already made their choice. You make your choice before you spread your legs. After you make your choice comes the time to be responsible about that choice. Abortion is the height of irresponsibility, aside from it being evil.

Abortion can be a very responsible choice and here is the proof:

--There's nothing responsible about having a kid you cant afford and expecting tax payers to take up that burden with public assistance.

--There's nothing responsible about having a kid you arent emotionally prepared to have and may abuse or neglect.

--There's nothing responsible about having a kid if you know you wont stop drinking, smoking, doing drugs, etc that will damage the unborn.

--There's nothing responsible about remaining pregnant and dropping out of high school or college or missing work and not fulfilling your potential in sciety.

--There's nothing responsible about remaining pregnant/having a child and not being able to fulfill your other commitments and obligations to family, dependents, employer, church, community, society.

--There's nothing responsible about having a kid and giving it up for adoption when there are already over 100,000 kids in America waiting to be adopted. It means one less waiting will find a home. It is immoral to encourage women to unnecessarily give birth only to add more unwanted kids to this pool.​


Now do you still deny that abortion can be very responsible?
 
Last edited:
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

There is just no way to sanitize or sterilize the grisly bloody slaughter of an innocent baby. All the sterlile clinical language in the world won't do it.

Lying again? Over and over, the same lie to try and promote your false and misogynistic agenda? You will have to answer for that someday, to the Lord.

Because you have been reminded over and over, that 97.5% of all abortions consist of painlessly flushing a pea-sized or smaller unborn from the womb. And the rest are all medically necessary.

No bloody slaughter....your self-indulgent feelings are based on false info and indicates a very disturbed mind and you use it to dishonestly emotionally manipulate people on an issue where you have no real facts to argue with.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Do you think your fake outrage over my words will cover for your view that little babies should be literally dismembered in the womb?

Lying again? Over and over, the same lie to try and promote your false and misogynistic agenda? You will have to answer for that someday, to the Lord.

Because you have been reminded over and over, that 97.5% of all abortions consist of painlessly flushing a pea-sized or smaller unborn from the womb. And the rest are all medically necessary.

No bloody slaughter....your self-indulgent feelings are based on false info and indicates a very disturbed mind and you use it to dishonestly emotionally manipulate people on an issue where you have no real facts to argue with.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom