• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W: 1134] Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I've busted your ass twice. Are you really coming back for more?

And not only married women are pro-life, the majority of ALL women in the US are pro-life.

74% of women think abortion should be legal in any or certain circumstances.

51% of women (just over half - not much of a majority) think they are pro-life. But we know from these debates that some say they are pro-life for themselves but pro-choice for others.

Abortion Trends by Gender
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Take your misunderstanding up with Merriam Webster.

try to properly read the definition, I cannot help it that you do not understand the comment that a baby is an infant. A fetus is not a "young child".
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Definition of child (Entry 1 of 3)
1a: an unborn or recently born person

Definition of baby (Entry 1 of 3)
1a(1): an extremely young child

Child | Definition of Child by Merriam-Webster
Baby | Definition of Baby by Merriam-Webster

Ergo, one definition of a baby is an extremely young unborn person. You lost.

Still wrong, you had to connect the dots yourself for child and baby...erroneously so.

And the unborn are not 'persons' at all:

1 U.S. Code SS 8 - “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

(a)In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.

(b)As used in this section, the term “born alive”, with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Birth control has nothing to do with health care. Taxpayers are paying for single women (Democrats) to mess around. It's shameful.

Men are benefitting exactly the same as women...no woman ever uses bc UNLESS she is having sex with a man. The men are using it equally, but they dont pay for it as often.

And millions of married couples use bc as well because they dont want to have more mouths to feed and care for than they can afford.

(There are some cases where women are prescribed The Pill for medical reasons)
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

If it is nota legal word ... it just a word with many meanings to many different people


The fact is baby is well known as term of term of endearment.

Boats, cars, adult friends of the opposite sex are addressed as baby.

My husband’s restored 1962 Cadillac Convertible is his baby.

Exactly! :lamo
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

It doesn't matter if people share them, my Catholic beliefs still apply to them. Just like gravity. Doesn't matter if you believe in the law of gravity or not. You slip on a banana, you still fall on your ass.

We can prove that gravity applies to all.

Let's see you prove that your Catholic beliefs apply to all.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I understand it perfectly. One definition of a baby, according to Webster's is a very young unborn person.

Nope, it said a 'child' was.

And that's also wrong.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Birth control has nothing to do with health care. Taxpayers are paying for single women (Democrats) to mess around. It's shameful.



Since about 65% of all 1,000,000 fetuses/year that are aborted are by women living either in poverty at the poverty line or slightly above poverty, tax payers will be responsible for supporting 65,000 children/year until they are 18

Let's do the math for 65,000 extra un-aborted and unwanted children /year.
The birthing of a child costs about $10,000 if nothing goes wrong
Post natal care costs about $5000
WIC costs about $2000
Well baby clinics and immunization about $4000. TOTAL$21,000. one time cost /child to be born

Someone estimated it costs about $5,000/ year to support a child. 18years x $5,000/year=$90,000/child for 18 years
Add in the cost of birth $21,000 + $90,000 for raising child for 18 years =$111,000

65,000 un-aborted children born into poverty or near poverty X $111,000 for each for 18 years=$7,215,000,000 every 18 years. BUT if you ban abortions and refuse to pay for contraceptives that's 65,000 new unaborted babies each year so in reality you are talking about $7,215,000,000 every year not just every 18 years.

Lets look at the cost of covering contraceptives in women's insurance.
Government negotiated contraceptives = about $10/month =$120/year X 65,000 women = $7,800,000/year x 18 years=$140,400,000

So compare
Contraceptives for 18 years _______________________________ $140,400,000.
VS
Supporting 65,000 children for 18 years_____________________$7,215,000,000


If you want to ban abortions and refuse birth control insurance then you can’t complain about the $7,074,000,000 extra it cost taxpayers to raise all those extra kids.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Yeah, it's for the married. If you want sex, get married.

Nope. I don't need to be married to have sex. Health benefits aren't just for the married. You do you, I'll do me, k?
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

That's the definition of moving the goalposts. Derp.

OMG. You said you proved the first claim. So, he's moving on to the next. Good Lord.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Where do you think government money comes from? The tooth fairy?

And where does your imaginary right to determine people's sex life comes from? The magic people in the sky?
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

OMG. You said you proved the first claim. So, he's moving on to the next. Good Lord.

Not really. He didn't acknowledge my proof of the first claim. He just moved the goalposts. This is a game he commonly plays. As does every leftwinger I've encountered here.
 
Last edited:
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

74% of women think abortion should be legal in any or certain circumstances.

51% of women (just over half - not much of a majority) think they are pro-life. But we know from these debates that some say they are pro-life for themselves but pro-choice for others.

Abortion Trends by Gender

Wrong. Pro-life is one choice. Pro-choice is another. Gallup says 51% of women are pro-life. They are mutually exclusive in the poll.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Birth control has nothing to do with health care. Taxpayers are paying for single women (Democrats) to mess around. It's shameful.

So we will start ending all health care costs for boner pills for men then? It is not for their health care that they get them but so that they could have sex with men and women (both married and unmarried).
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Merriam Webster says a baby is a young child, either born or unborn. Stop arguing the point with me and take it up with them if you don't like their definition.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Wrong. Pro-life is one choice. Pro-choice is another. Gallup says 51% of women are pro-life. They are mutually exclusive in the poll.

No, they are not mutually exclusive. They were asked what they were, not whether or not they would allow other people to make their own medical choices.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

So we will start ending all health care costs for boner pills for men then? It is not for their health care that they get them but so that they could have sex with men and women (both married and unmarried).

Sure. Get rid of funding for Viagra. Has zero to do with health care.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Merriam Webster says a baby is a young child, either born or unborn. Stop arguing the point with me and take it up with them if you don't like their definition.

No, they said an infant. Now an infant is a very young child, but a fetus is not a young child, it is not even a born child. It is still gestating and only has gestational age, not actual age.

You are you celebrate your birthday one year after birth, not one year after conception.

You are just trying to connect 2 descriptions that are of 2 different things.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Nope. I don't need to be married to have sex. Health benefits aren't just for the married. You do you, I'll do me, k?

Anybody who has sex outside of marriage is being damaged psychologically. So many leftwingers discount the effect of violating one of God's most important laws. Sex used correctly, within hetero marriage is a great force for good. Sex that is used illicitly does tremendous emotional damage.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Sure. Get rid of funding for Viagra. Has zero to do with health care.

Well that will go down well in the republican party and the vatican. If democrats are the only way they can get viagra, you will see older white men flocking to the democrats. Which is good for women's birth control and allowing the existence of Roe v. Wade.

And like said before, Roe v. Wade will not change the right women have to get an abortion, they will just have to travel for it. And I am sure many pro-choice individuals will gladly donate to that cause if only to circumvent pro-life extremists like you.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

No, they said an infant. Now an infant is a very young child, but a fetus is not a young child, it is not even a born child. It is still gestating and only has gestational age, not actual age.

You are you celebrate your birthday one year after birth, not one year after conception.

You are just trying to connect 2 descriptions that are of 2 different things.

I pasted the definition. It says what I said it said.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Well that will go down well in the republican party and the vatican. If democrats are the only way they can get viagra, you will see older white men flocking to the democrats. Which is good for women's birth control and allowing the existence of Roe v. Wade.

And like said before, Roe v. Wade will not change the right women have to get an abortion, they will just have to travel for it. And I am sure many pro-choice individuals will gladly donate to that cause if only to circumvent pro-life extremists like you.

Oh BS. Who needs that stuff anyway? Stay in shape and you won't.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

No, they are not mutually exclusive. They were asked what they were, not whether or not they would allow other people to make their own medical choices.

If they weren't mutually exclusive, why would they have two categories: pro-life vs pro-choice? Derp.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

No, they said an infant. Now an infant is a very young child, but a fetus is not a young child, it is not even a born child. It is still gestating and only has gestational age, not actual age.

You are you celebrate your birthday one year after birth, not one year after conception.

You are just trying to connect 2 descriptions that are of 2 different things.

Merriam Webster: Baby=young child. Child=an unborn or recently born. Ergo Baby=a young unborn or a young recently born.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom