• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Abortion & Christ

I don't know how to break this to you but childbirth is how we propagate our species. For you to argue against that is pure ignorance.

Don't lecture me about ignorance after the things YOU write. Our species is propagating just fine without those unwanted births. The calculation sex=baby is one that doesn't include the variable "human rights for women". It's the most absurd, religionists perspective because it ignores every advancement we've made medically, socially and morally AS a species. It's a throwback position for people who can't comprehend anything more nuanced than a bumper sticker.

I'm not arguing against childbirth, my tenaciously wrong friend, I'm arguing against FORCED childbirth. Or, as it's often called "religious tyranny" and the subjugation of women.
 
I would trust them before I'd trust you.

Some times they want children later but not now. Why the **** are you playing dumb about this? It's the simplest concept.
 
Don't lecture me about ignorance after the things YOU write. Our species is propagating just fine without those unwanted births. The calculation sex=baby is one that doesn't include the variable "human rights for women". It's the most absurd, religionists perspective because it ignores every advancement we've made medically, socially and morally AS a species. It's a throwback position for people who can't comprehend anything more nuanced than a bumper sticker.

I'm not arguing against childbirth, my tenaciously wrong friend, I'm arguing against FORCED childbirth. Or, as it's often called "religious tyranny" and the subjugation of women.

You claim my perspective "ignores every advancement we have made medically, socially, and morally" but it is YOUR SIDE that is arguing about how unsafe childbirth is in the 21st century. "Forced childbirth", you say? Nobody is forcing anybody into childbirth any more than they are forcing them to have unprotected sex.
 
You claim my perspective "ignores every advancement we have made medically, socially, and morally" but it is YOUR SIDE that is arguing about how unsafe childbirth is in the 21st century. "Forced childbirth", you say? Nobody is forcing anybody into childbirth any more than they are forcing them to have unprotected sex.

“Bitches should keep their knees together.”

We get it. Not that we agree. But the backwards thinking sentiment is well understood.
 
Listen, lady, I have a son who is dying of stage 4 pancreatic cancer. Kill your own kids if you want to, your petty problems are of no concern to me. You can pretend life is cheap, I don't and won't agree. You will answer to your maker.

What a ****ing cruel, religious threat. Maybe you should spend your time saying goodbye to your son rather than judging the souls of others, like a ****ing douche. You just can't turn it off can you?
 
Some times they want children later but not now. Why the **** are you playing dumb about this? It's the simplest concept.

It is simple for the simple minded. For analytical thinkers, there is a 1:1 correlation between sex and childbirth.
 
"Forced childbirth", you say? Nobody is forcing anybody into childbirth

if you infringe on and limit thier rights then thats factually what would be happening, theres no way around that
 
It is simple for the simple minded. For analytical thinkers, there is a 1:1 correlation between sex and childbirth.

but theres factually not LMAO!!!!! wow nothing like completely owning yourself.... "analytical thinkers":lamo

wow that just made my morning
 
Then they made the choice to risk pregnancy.

sure did and now they get to handle it as they wish within the law based on their rights . . .not have your feelings forced on them and their rights violated :)

sex will never be consent to giving birth
driving has risks, drinking does too, walking down an alley etc etc no excuse to violate rights and force additional rick of health/life on anybody
 
sure did and now they get to handle it as they wish within the law based on their rights . . .not have your feelings forced on them and their rights violated :)

sex will never be consent to giving birth

Why not?
 
Right, and again, none of this counters what I said. I appreciate the effort, but I'm not sure if you are agreeing with or trying to counter my argument or just replying to me for no reason.

I disagreed with your statement that : “God doesn't much care for governments or politicians, and that they all tend to be horribly corrupt and do bad things.” According to the mounds of literature and dogma dealing with church and state it would seem that God was quite interested in government. It got me thinking about the history of religion and government and I rambled on from there. Sorry
 
Really? What's the difference? A second? Two seconds? Or maybe it's distance. One centimeter? Two centimeters? With some of you this has stopped being a conviction, it's a religion.

Who is aborting a child 2 seconds before birth... which by the way... is during childbirth. Who is doing this. Who is aborting a child during childbirth. Do you have statistics on this?
 
Then they made the choice to risk pregnancy.

And they knew that they had options if they got pregnant, things like birth, adoption, or abortion.

And that they were perfectly free to choose any of those.
 
Back
Top Bottom