• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Miscarriage just some mess on a napkin...

year2late said:
So you refuse to answer the simplest question.

What does an early miscarriage look like? Let us say 6 weeks.
Click to expand...
Ive answered the question completely and factually. A miscarriage is the loss of a developing unborn baby, just as your support of abortion is the deliberate and inhuman slaughter of unborn children. Biology rules. The unborn child will only ever be an unborn child, no matter what its stage of development and no matter how desperately you try to make your position less inhuman.
 
year2late said:
Again.....tell me what an early miscarriage looks like.
Click to expand...

He will not answer what it looks like because that would be admitting it looks like a woman’s period and if she has NOT taken a pregnancy test she would not even know she had been pregnant.

Millions of fertilized eggs ( zygotes ) that never implanted are passed through the woman’s body every year.

Maybe we Need to have tiny coffins for those too.
 
VanceMack said:
I'm sure you think that will help you sleep better.

It doesnt matter when you slaughter the unborn child. 9 days...9 weeks, or 9 months. You are still advocating for the butchering of 800,000 unborn children a year. And I suspect you know that.
Click to expand...

Who's eating them?

I sleep quite well, thank you.
 
VanceMack said:
I understand your need to dehumanize unborn babies. Its in your every word.

It doesnt matter when you kill it. You know what you are killing. And we both know why you need to make the inhuman less inhuman.
Click to expand...

Your pictures don't sway me one bit.
 
Scrabaholic said:
Who's eating them?

I sleep quite well, thank you.
Click to expand...
Good for you. I applaud everyone that drops their pretense of concern and just straight up admits they dont give a **** about the wholesale slaughter of unborn children in the name of convenience, miscarriages, etc. At least you are honest.
 
Scrabaholic said:
Your pictures don't sway me one bit.
Click to expand...
I wouldnt think so. Once you commit to the inhuman, you really kind of need to stick to it. The alternative is pretty horrific.
 
VanceMack said:
Im not missing the point at all. I'm applauding the honest lack of regard of the loss of babies due to miscarriage. If all pro slaughter people were as honest as this woman we could stop pretending that miscarriages are a tragic loss of life that women should feel sad over. The selective poutrage is almost more sickening than the support of the slaughter of the unborn.
Click to expand...


"Poutrage": what a fantastic new word to describe the emotional state of conservative men when they find out women don't need their advice about reproduction.

Psychotic poutrage is the emotional state of conservative men when the woman they impregnated but won't support (because getting pregnant was her fault)aborts his fetus.
 
VanceMack said:
Good for you. I applaud everyone that drops their pretense of concern and just straight up admits they dont give a **** about the wholesale slaughter of unborn children in the name of convenience, miscarriages, etc. At least you are honest.
Click to expand...

Do not lie about me. I said no such thing.
 
VanceMack said:
I wouldnt think so. Once you commit to the inhuman, you really kind of need to stick to it. The alternative is pretty horrific.
Click to expand...

What is inhuman is forcing women to gestate and give birth against their will.
 
VanceMack said:
Ive answered the question completely and factually. A miscarriage is the loss of a developing unborn baby, just as your support of abortion is the deliberate and inhuman slaughter of unborn children. Biology rules. The unborn child will only ever be an unborn child, no matter what its stage of development and no matter how desperately you try to make your position less inhuman.
Click to expand...

That answers nothing. A woman miscarrying looking down at her menstral pad or underwear would see hood and maybe what looks like a small clot. Many women (if not most) have clots with menstration. 6 weeks would be pee sized - smaller than some clots she may normally pass with menstration.

Listen to the context of her speech. That is what she is referring to.
 
minnie616 said:
He will not answer what it looks like because that would be admitting it looks like a woman’s period and if she has NOT taken a pregnancy test she would not even know she had been pregnant.

Millions of fertilized eggs ( zygotes ) that never implanted are passed through the woman’s body every year.

Maybe we Need to have tiny coffins for those too.
Click to expand...

Maybe he has a get rich quick scheme for selling maxi pad coffins bundled with pregnancy tests.
 
VanceMack said:
I wouldnt think so. Once you commit to the inhuman, you really kind of need to stick to it. The alternative is pretty horrific.
Click to expand...



There is nothing inhuman about acknowledging a human a human zygote , or a human embryo, Is not a child and chances are God or nature ( whichever your believe is) most of the unborn are naturally spontaneously aborted or will never even complete implantation. Another 15 to 20 percent will naturally miscarry most within the first trimester.
 
minnie616 said:
There is nothing inhuman about acknowledging a human a human zygote , or a human embryo, Is not a child and chances are God or nature ( whichever your believe is) most of the unborn are naturally spontaneously aborted or will never even complete implantation. Another 15 to 20 percent will naturally miscarry most within the first trimester.
Click to expand...
There is everything inhuman about the willing endorsement of the slaughter of 800,000 unborn children...which is why you and others need to dehumanize them.
 
VanceMack said:
There is everything inhuman about the willing endorsement of the slaughter of 800,000 unborn children...which is why you and others need to dehumanize them.
Click to expand...

And still unwilling or unable to say what a miscarried embryo literally looks like.
 
minnie616 said:
There is nothing inhuman about acknowledging a human a human zygote , or a human embryo, Is not a child and chances are God or nature ( whichever your believe is) most of the unborn are naturally spontaneously aborted or will never even complete implantation. Another 15 to 20 percent will naturally miscarry most within the first trimester.
Click to expand...

And many not even realizing they were briefly pregnant.
 
VanceMack said:
You are making my point. As long as the slaughter occurs before some magic timeline, you can convince yourself that the butchering of unborn children is somehow less inhuman.
Click to expand...

How is miscarriage a slaughter?
 
year2late said:
And many not even realizing they were briefly pregnant.
Click to expand...

My ex-wife had a miscarriage while we were married... if I remember correctly she did not know about it until she went to the doctor because she thought it was an unusual late period, or something. THEN, she was emotionally very upset.
 
Bodhisattva said:
How is miscarriage a slaughter?
Click to expand...
You obviously arent following along in the discussion. Go back...read the conversations. If you have something original to add...feel free. If not...dont bother. Or do...but dont expect a response. I figure responding to 4 people saying the exact same thing in a topic is good enough.
 
VanceMack said:
There is everything inhuman about the willing endorsement of the slaughter of 800,000 unborn children...which is why you and others need to dehumanize them.
Click to expand...

Using the proper terms for something is not dehumanizing. It's the way adults talk. Thinking up maudlin or saccharine terms for a zygote, embryo or fetus like: unborn babies, little babies, tiny little humans is not only mawkish it infantilizes women. The implication being women are childish and immature and need laws controlling their behavior.

Run around with your hair on fire screeching "slaughter" if it amuses you. But know that you are no more accurate in your screeching than you are in making up cute little names for perfectly accurate adult words.
 
Last edited:
tampon coffin.jpg
 
VanceMack said:
Ive answered the question completely and factually.
Click to expand...

No you haven't, Vance. Your OP was just some mess on a napkin, and your responses were a series of abortions.

A miscarriage is the loss of a developing unborn baby, just as your support of abortion is the deliberate and inhuman slaughter of unborn children.
Click to expand...

You obviously don't care about people who have miscarried. Your ilk wants to investigate them to make sure they haven't committed a criminal act. As if they haven't been through enough trauma already. As if that investigation wouldn't violate their bodily autonomy, something your ilk doesn't care about, either.

Biology rules. The unborn child will only ever be an unborn child, no matter what its stage of development and no matter how desperately you try to make your position less inhuman.
Click to expand...

Vitality. Your argument is invalid. :)
 
Since cons think god created man in his image, how do these pro-birthers rectify the fact science has confirmed sperm to be alive; if god created man, why did he create man to involuntarily expell sperm from his testes every few days or weeks?

God engineered mass genocide?
 
VanceMack said:
They are indeed all wonderful pictures of a baby, at differing levels of their developmental stage.
Click to expand...

Yep....American kids learn that in grammar school health class...so I guess you just imagined they had some further emotionally manipulative power than their factual expression of the stages?

You still fail to articulate an argument and attempt to express your feelings in pictures? LOL, not very effective.

Advocating for the slaughter of them at 9 days or 9 weeks is no less in human than advocating for their slaughter on the day of their birth.
Click to expand...

Who says? What authority? No American law, not the Christian God who never spoke of abortion. Your opinion is very nice...for you. It matters zero to women you dont know.

Your basic misunderstanding continues to raise its head...to be pro-choice is to advocate for women and women's choice....because altho the unborn may have value to each individual woman, as a society we value women more.
 
VanceMack said:
Or not. Or we can just go on pretending that the unborn dont matter....
Click to expand...

Please explain how the unborn 'matter' to anyone not immediately involved with the woman carrying it? And the justification for that reason (for others) to mean anything to the woman carrying it?

There are no negative effects of abortion on society, unless you can list some?
 
VanceMack said:
There is everything inhuman about the willing endorsement of the slaughter of 800,000 unborn children...which is why you and others need to dehumanize them.
Click to expand...

Why does it matter if it's one child or 800,000? LOLOL, you have yet to answer that one, as you dehumanize all those unborn by reducing them merely to numbers in order to attempt to drive your personal agenda?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom