Thread: Miscarriage just some mess on a napkin...

Originally Posted by VanceMack

Ive answered the question completely and factually.

No you haven't, Vance. Your OP was just some mess on a napkin, and your responses were a series of abortions.

A miscarriage is the loss of a developing unborn baby, just as your support of abortion is the deliberate and inhuman slaughter of unborn children.

You obviously don't care about people who have miscarried. Your ilk wants to investigate them to make sure they haven't committed a criminal act. As if they haven't been through enough trauma already. As if that investigation wouldn't violate their bodily autonomy, something your ilk doesn't care about, either.

Biology rules. The unborn child will only ever be an unborn child, no matter what its stage of development and no matter how desperately you try to make your position less inhuman.

Vitality. Your argument is invalid.

Since cons think god created man in his image, how do these pro-birthers rectify the fact science has confirmed sperm to be alive; if god created man, why did he create man to involuntarily expell sperm from his testes every few days or weeks?

God engineered mass genocide?

Originally Posted by VanceMack

They are indeed all wonderful pictures of a baby, at differing levels of their developmental stage.

Yep....American kids learn that in grammar school health class...so I guess you just imagined they had some further emotionally manipulative power than their factual expression of the stages?

You still fail to articulate an argument and attempt to express your feelings in pictures? LOL, not very effective.

Advocating for the slaughter of them at 9 days or 9 weeks is no less in human than advocating for their slaughter on the day of their birth.

Who says? What authority? No American law, not the Christian God who never spoke of abortion. Your opinion is very nice...for you. It matters zero to women you dont know.

Your basic misunderstanding continues to raise its head...to be pro-choice is to advocate for women and women's choice....because altho the unborn may have value to each individual woman, as a society we value women more.

Originally Posted by VanceMack

Or not. Or we can just go on pretending that the unborn dont matter....

Please explain how the unborn 'matter' to anyone not immediately involved with the woman carrying it? And the justification for that reason (for others) to mean anything to the woman carrying it?

There are no negative effects of abortion on society, unless you can list some?

Originally Posted by VanceMack

There is everything inhuman about the willing endorsement of the slaughter of 800,000 unborn children...which is why you and others need to dehumanize them.

Why does it matter if it's one child or 800,000? LOLOL, you have yet to answer that one, as you dehumanize all those unborn by reducing them merely to numbers in order to attempt to drive your personal agenda?