np.
Weaver2 said:
You are correct. There is a system of checks and balances. However, just because a court may say it's unconstitutional, doesn't mean i still can't vote on the ballot box. As long as I have a right to vote, I have right to vote for my demands, regardless of what the system would say about it in the end. To say otherwise, as weaver did, is disenfranchising to everyone, not just the religious people he complains about.
that's exactly what I said, you just used wikipedia lingo, while I looked up the sources myself. They illegalize in law, but they exempt the woman from liability. it's basically like decriminalization. German law is basically little different from my stance here. I do not think that the woman, at this point, should be held liable for abortion, but only that abortion should legally be condemned.
consider it as you will, the minute the research is final on all the causes and factors of abortion, so legislation can be tweaked and modified, it's illegalized at that point. Your invented right to deny life to play video games, and go "ohhhh that's okay!" has absolutely no room in my opinions here. I just want research to be done and completed, and as more information comes out every year, the less i'd consider waiting.
How do I support something I vehemently condemn? you're talking nonsense now.
again, you ignore nuance. I am perfectly capable of realizing the good, and the bad, of all these laws, based on the information I have. I do support germany's laws? some i do. I do support all of them? no. The closest country that gets to my position, and i've told you many time now, is Poland.