• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:344:1201]License to Kill

Re: License to Kill

Angel said:
Both have been amply supported.
Click to expand...

Only by your meaningless, unsupportable, feelings and claims not by any facts. If you disagree please present those FACTS now, thank you.
 
Re: License to Kill

AGENT J said:
Only by your meaningless, unsupportable, feelings and claims not by any facts. If you disagree please present those FACTS now, thank you.
Click to expand...
Already presented. Read.
 
Re: License to Kill

Angel said:
Already presented. Read.
Click to expand...
we did they all failed. We you have new ones based on facts let us know, thanks!
 
Re: License to Kill

AGENT J said:
we did they all failed. We you have new ones based on facts let us know, thanks!
Click to expand...
It's apparent that you are using the word "fact" idiosyncratically and tendentiously. What do you think a "fact" is?
 
Re: License to Kill

Angel said:
It's apparent that you are using the word "fact" idiosyncratically and tendentiously. What do you think a "fact" is?
Click to expand...

Its apparent your post is another dodge that fails. Please stay on topic. We are waiting for you to post one fact that supports abortion is a license to kill and abortion is objective. Thanks
 
Re: License to Kill

AGENT J said:
Its apparent your post is another dodge that fails. Please stay on topic. We are waiting for you to post one fact that supports abortion is a license to kill and abortion is objective. Thanks
Click to expand...
What is a "fact"? Or don't you know what you're forever posting about?
 
Re: License to Kill

Angel said:
What is a "fact"? Or don't you know what you're forever posting about?
Click to expand...

Angel said:
American legal culture has, for going on fifty years now, conferred upon women, necessarily and irrevocably, a license to kill.

A moral catastrophe of the first order.
Click to expand...

once again this is the OP topic, please factually prove these two claims, thanks
 
Re: License to Kill

Angel said:
This is a marvelously original meme, Angel. And right on the beam too. I just love the play on "nature v. nurture"! I wonder, though, if the reference isn't lost on the average reader. Anyway, keep up the good work.
Click to expand...

Smart people don't think everyone else is stupid
 
Re: License to Kill

Angel said:
What do you mean by "fact"?
Click to expand...


Angel said:
American legal culture has, for going on fifty years now, conferred upon women, necessarily and irrevocably, a license to kill.

A moral catastrophe of the first order.
Click to expand...

once again this is the OP topic, please factually prove these two claims, thanks
 
Re: License to Kill

AGENT J said:
once again this is the OP topic, please factually prove these two claims, thanks
Click to expand...
Please tell us what you mean by "fact"?
And while you're at it, what you mean by "prove"?
 
Re: License to Kill

Angel said:
Please tell us what you mean by "fact"?
And while you're at it, what you mean by "prove"?
Click to expand...


Angel said:
American legal culture has, for going on fifty years now, conferred upon women, necessarily and irrevocably, a license to kill.

A moral catastrophe of the first order.
Click to expand...

once again this is the OP topic, please factually prove these two claims, thanks
 
Re: License to Kill

AGENT J said:
once again this is the OP topic, please factually prove these two claims, thanks
Click to expand...
What you seek may already have been given, but no one can know this unless you tell us what you mean by "fact" and "prove."
 
Re: License to Kill

AGENT J said:
once again this is the OP topic, please factually prove these two claims, thanks
Click to expand...

I very distinctly and politely asked him to define "moral catastrophe" pages ago, and he was unable to provide that, at all.
Lursa said:
How is aborting (legally killing) 50 million human beings in 50 years a moral catastrophe?
Click to expand...

Lursa said:
{that was} not an answer to my question:

Please describe "the moral catastrophe we have on our hands?" Be specific, as a "catastrophe" implies negative affects on society ("our hands").'​

All you do is pretend that re-labeling 'moral catastrophe' with things like 'moral blindness,' 'moral education,' 'moral vision,' etc explains it.

It does not. You didnt define what the moral catastrophe is at all...all you did was obfuscate. What are the effects of this on our society? Please try again.
Click to expand...

Perhaps he will answer you.
 
Last edited:
Re: License to Kill

Angel said:
That's the only argument you have -- lamo.
Click to expand...

Who needs one? You defeated yourself with your own words.:2razz:
 
Re: License to Kill

Angel said:
American legal culture has, for going on fifty years now, conferred upon women, necessarily and irrevocably, a license to kill.

A moral catastrophe of the first order.
Click to expand...
Can anybody support these two claim in the OP with facts that make them true? Please do so, thanks
 
Re: License to Kill

Lursa said:
I very distinctly and politely asked him to define "moral catastrophe" pages ago, and he was unable to provide that, at all.




Perhaps he will answer you.
Click to expand...

Well in almost 600 posts ZERO facts have been posted that make the OP true or even logical so I guess we'll see.
 
Re: License to Kill

Angel said:
I stand corrected: lamo plus peeweehermaneutics. What a combo!
Click to expand...

And yet you defeated yourself with your own words.



Originally Posted by Angel
My moral intuitions tell me that the elective killing of human beings at a rate of a million per year is immoral. What do your moral intuitions tell you?
 
Re: License to Kill

year2late said:
And yet you defeated yourself with your own words.



Originally Posted by Angel
My moral intuitions tell me that the elective killing of human beings at a rate of a million per year is immoral. What do your moral intuitions tell you?
Click to expand...
I've already disabused you of your misunderstanding of my statement. What are you about here anyway?
The principle of morality is objective, grounded in biology.
Moral judgment is subjective.
Moral intuition is a form of moral judgment.
 
Re: License to Kill

Angel said:
The record is there, Quag. Your posts on the nature of morality, all of them going back two years, have been exposed as the vacuous assertions of a catchphrase and nothing more.
And I have addressed your other factoid whether or not you understand or accept the distinction between the principle of morality and particular moral judgments.
Click to expand...

Yup the record is there and I will post yet again your own words destroying your own OP

Angel said:
My moral intuitions tell me that the elective killing of human beings at a rate of a million per year is immoral. What do your moral intuitions tell you?
Click to expand...
 
Re: License to Kill

Angel said:
I'm afraid you wouldn't know a fact from a hole in the ground if it traveled to Pittsburgh and bit on your ass.
Now read better, start to think, and post sincerely.
Click to expand...

Very ironic post and coming for a poster who claimed he never uses insults makes it doubly so
 
Re: License to Kill

Quag said:
Yup the record is there and I will post yet again your own words destroying your own OP
Click to expand...
Oy! Moral intuitions are a form of moral judgment, which is subjective. The principle of morality is objective, grounded in biology. Please stop repeating your canard.
 
Re: License to Kill

Angel said:
The principle of morality is objective, grounded in biology.
Click to expand...

Links and fact to support that claim, thanks!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom