Page 87 of 87 FirstFirst ... 3777858687
Results 861 to 867 of 867

Thread: [W:344]License to Kill

  1. #861
    Sage AProudLefty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:34 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    5,860

    Re: License to Kill

    Quote Originally Posted by Return Rocket View Post
    A Cleverbot sounds adorable. Can we keep him? Please 🙏
    Have at it!

    Cleverbot.com - a clever bot - speak to an AI with some Actual Intelligence?
    Trump: "Our plan is to keep the American people safe."

    Pelosi: "That's not a plan. That's a goal."

  2. #862
    Sage RaleBulgarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    7,568

    Re: License to Kill

    Quote Originally Posted by Lursa View Post
    Perhaps he believes that since so many of the pro-life supporters swallow this crap whole, that we dont question it either?

    He'd be mistaken...again.
    I’m glad that the views of folks like marke, Angel, and Mashmont continue to be considered to be on the fringe of modern society.
    if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment.

  3. #863
    Professor
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:20 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,319

    Re: License to Kill

    Quote Originally Posted by marke View Post
    Life News quotes from public sources which are respected by nearly everyone. You do nothing to dismiss the report on the basis of your disrespectful opinions about Life News, if you do not refute the government and educational sources quoted by Life News.
    The Life News article written by a convicted criminal, David Dalieden, takes phrases and single words out of context from government and medical documents and uses them to convey disgust and horror about perfectly legitimate, humane and honorable research.

    Here's the section from Daleiden's article that seems to be giving you the most trouble:

    They even washed the babies: “Upon its arrival at the cGMP facility, each fetus was weighed, 1rinsed with an iodine solution, and placed onto a sterile surgical tray.” Then they cut their livers out.

    Gerlach et al. first published their work in 2012 after he “designed and coordinated the program” and “developed the methods” for liver harvesting. Gerlach’s colleagues published a more detailed description of the technique in 2017, crediting him as its originator:2We developed a five-step in vivo perfusion method by umbilical vein cannulation to isolate liver cells from fetuses at the late second trimester.”

    3In vivo, of course, means “in the living.” To a medical certainty, a 5-month-old fetus aborted intact by labor induction is alive at the time of delivery. Feticides such as digoxin cannot be used in a harvesting case, and the whole point of the Gerlach protocol is to obtain4 fresh, live, clean liver cells for transplantation minimizing time without circulation

    1. Yes washed to keep the tissue sterile since it is going to be transplanted into a human; Yes, placed on a sterile tray. It's a medical lab doing a transplant, where else would you place the fetus?
    2.In vivo; tissue that is still living not dead. Live tissue is the only kind that can be transplanted.
    3. In vivo does not mean the fetus is living or was alive. It simply means the tissue is not dead.
    4. "minimizing time without circulation" in other words the cells within the tissue are still living but blood is not circulating. The liver tissue is not, as you think because Dalieden implied, extracted from living fetuses.

    THERE IS NOTHING HORRIBLE OR ILLEGAL OR UNETHICAL GOING ON HERE. A WOMAN HAS GIVEN HER CONSENT AND DONATED A MALFORMED FETUS THAT HAD TO BE ABORTED IN THE LATE 2ND TRIMESTER, TO BE USED IN LIVER TRANSPLANT RESEARCH. NO PROCEDURES WERE PERFORMED ON A LIVE BABY

    What do you not understand about this?

  4. #864
    Sage

    Scrabaholic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    15,094

    Re: License to Kill

    Quote Originally Posted by marke View Post
    When harvesting organs from unborn babies, the babies must first be delivered alive, cleaned and then cut up to obtain the various parts needed to distribute to those trading in human body parts.
    This is the biggest pile I've read so far today. And I've read some pretty big piles.

  5. #865
    Professor
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:20 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,319

    Re: License to Kill

    Quote Originally Posted by weaver2 View Post
    THERE IS NOTHING HORRIBLE OR ILLEGAL OR UNETHICAL GOING ON HERE. A WOMAN HAS GIVEN HER CONSENT AND DONATED A MALFORMED FETUS THAT HAD TO BE ABORTED IN THE LATE 2ND TRIMESTER, TO BE USED IN LIVER TRANSPLANT RESEARCH. NO PROCEDURES WERE PERFORMED ON A LIVE BABY
    Why is it you focus on all the piles of lies people like David Daleiden and sites like Life News are spewing out? There are actually abortion topics that needs to be addressed; why can't you focus on them instead of the meaningless crap you post here? Is it just salacious interest; the gorier the better for you?

  6. #866
    Sage

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:49 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    18,282

    Re: License to Kill

    Quote Originally Posted by marke View Post
    Life News quotes from public sources which are respected by nearly everyone. You do nothing to dismiss the report on the basis of your disrespectful opinions about Life News, if you do not refute the government and educational sources quoted by Life News.
    Life Site News frequently posts articles without scrutinizing the material. Just a basic sniff test would be a good start. There was an article about Stem a press selling beating hearts ....and people here gobbled it up as if was fact. Then a lot of their stats are nonsense or very old. Even someone like Abby Johnson lied and a basic look at here Facebook would show that she prided herself on her work at PP until her boss started disciplining her. Was it not just enough to be active in a cause without making up a fake story?

    When a site consistently does not scrutinize the most wild stories....how do you expect us to believe them on the little stuff?

    I mean seriously... selling beating hearts from aborted fetuses?

  7. #867
    User
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:31 PM
    Gender
    Posts
    4

    Re: License to Kill

    Fascinating. Not being facetious in the least. If you take the name at face value, it legit sounds like a 21st century Tamagochi.

Page 87 of 87 FirstFirst ... 3777858687

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •