• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Planned Parenthood admits selling baby body parts, reported in news story out Sept. 4, 2019.

nota bene said:
So if "tumultuous labor" results in "fetal expulsion" and becomes a live baby, what do you call this--infanticide?
Click to expand...

It would be a live birth If the fetus was living at birth and the infant would be given comfort care or extraordinary care.


A 20 week old fetus does not become live once expelled.


His statement should have been as the fetus was alive in the woman’s womb before it was expelled which is the case of most abortions that take place before 20 weeks. Exceptions are when the fetus is already dead from natural causes or when the fetus was given a fatal injection to stop the heartbeat before contractions or induced or before the fetus is extracted by the doctor.
 
Last edited:
LifeSite lies

year2late said:
I am curious...you are putting quotes around the Planned Parenthood in court statement. Can you show me who in Planned Parenthood said those words? I mean, Planned Parenthood cannot talk....so there should be a specific spokesperson you can point to. If this is just another Life Site News "interpretation"?

Perhaps a court transcript will allows to see the actual words ?
Click to expand...

Yah. See Did Court Testimony Prove a Biotech Company Harvests Organs from Live Fetuses?

"Did Court Testimony Prove a Biotech Company Harvests Organs from Live Fetuses?
"Among other issues, a troubling headline about "beating baby hearts" resulted in accusations of witness intimidation.
"Bethania Palma
"Alex Kasprak
"Published 12 September 2019

"The anti-abortion website LifeSite published a story containing a headline that said the CEO of the biotech company StemExpress admitted in court to “selling beating baby hearts, intact baby heads.” That headline was not only false, but it presented a security risk to a witness in a criminal trial, according to a report from an investigator with the California state Department of Justice.

"The LifeSite story is based on an ongoing preliminary hearing in the criminal case against David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt, the anti-abortion activists behind the making of controversial, heavily edited “sting” videos targeting Planned Parenthood in 2015.

"The videos, which were produced by Daleiden’s non-profit organization Center for Medical Progress (CMP), attempted unsuccessfully to show that Planned Parenthood was illegally trafficking in fetal tissue. But while Planned Parenthood was cleared in resulting investigations, Daleidon and Merritt were criminally charged and are currently facing 15 counts of felony invasion of privacy in California."

(My emphasis - more @ the URL - including a discussion of the Langendorff perfusion methodology, when it's used & why.)

LifeSite & their screaming cohorts think they're justified in doing anything @ all to stop abortion & Planned Parenthood & any other provider.
 
Re: LifeSite lies

southwest88 said:
Yah. See Did Court Testimony Prove a Biotech Company Harvests Organs from Live Fetuses?

"Did Court Testimony Prove a Biotech Company Harvests Organs from Live Fetuses?
"Among other issues, a troubling headline about "beating baby hearts" resulted in accusations of witness intimidation.
"Bethania Palma
"Alex Kasprak
"Published 12 September 2019

"The anti-abortion website LifeSite published a story containing a headline that said the CEO of the biotech company StemExpress admitted in court to “selling beating baby hearts, intact baby heads.” That headline was not only false, but it presented a security risk to a witness in a criminal trial, according to a report from an investigator with the California state Department of Justice.

"The LifeSite story is based on an ongoing preliminary hearing in the criminal case against David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt, the anti-abortion activists behind the making of controversial, heavily edited “sting” videos targeting Planned Parenthood in 2015.

"The videos, which were produced by Daleiden’s non-profit organization Center for Medical Progress (CMP), attempted unsuccessfully to show that Planned Parenthood was illegally trafficking in fetal tissue. But while Planned Parenthood was cleared in resulting investigations, Daleidon and Merritt were criminally charged and are currently facing 15 counts of felony invasion of privacy in California."

(My emphasis - more @ the URL - including a discussion of the Langendorff perfusion methodology, when it's used & why.)

LifeSite & their screaming cohorts think they're justified in doing anything @ all to stop abortion & Planned Parenthood & any other provider.
Click to expand...

Truth and reporting honestly never bothered LifeSite.
 
Re: LifeSite lies

weaver2 said:
Truth and reporting honestly never bothered LifeSite.
Click to expand...
If one has to lie to support a cause....it makes the cause a farce and not worthy of further recognition. The lies become the story.

If they are reporting in "good faith" and find out the information is likely false....then every time they repeat the information they are in fact liars.

IMHO intentionally misleading is on par with lying.

I can respect a different perspective....even if it is wildly different than mine. I cannot respect a person or site that needs to present their perspective with misleading and false information.

How many times has LifeSiteNews retracted disproven information?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom