Well...I am not a mental health professional, so my personal opinion carries no weight in regards to the "scientific" term "paranoid whackadoodles." (A term which must of course have come from somewhere in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–5) provided by the American Psychiatric Association).
My lay opinion is that this couple hold extreme religious views on the subject. That they are quoting from, and interpreting the meaning of, terms from their Religious texts.
I don't agree with their interpretations. But I see nothing wrong in their spouting them; you know, non-violent freedom of expression even when I don't agree with what's being said?
I doubt they are going to convince enough people to change the law on a woman's right to choose.
I am still Pro-Choice, and nothing they've said convinces me otherwise. :shrug:
****ing assholes is the best description.
Right now there are many many pro life people shaking their heads and saying, "You're not helping!"
The genetic mother doesn't really either, save when it's in her own body. Should the parents use a surrogate, and the woman later change her mind, she has no right to terminate the ZEF, nor opt out of child support, any more than the father does. Likewise, a surrogate has the absolute right to end the pregnancy at any time. She might have to pay back any monies she's recieved but she still has that right.
With that logic, then it's the guy's money and 100% his right to choose not to pay taxes with no consequences.
You’re conflating separate choice and legal matters.
