• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

North Korea's forced abortions: The Hermit Kingdom's underreported human rights abuses

Insults rather than discussion....

Hey, you are the one fixated on Trump.

Not me.

You are the one excusing trumps praises (saying he is in love) to a murderous dictator.
 
TDS is an ugly thing.

Carry on.

Yes Trump Defense Syndrome (TDS) is an ugly thing, glad you admitted it and maybe you can get better instead of mindlessly defending Trumps actions.
 
Dude it wasn't something conciliatory, it was ****ing praising a tyrant. It's not like Trump was praising Biden or another American politician he was praising a murderous dictator. Good to know your bar is so low you consider Kim "another politician". Your Trump worshiping is just plain disgusting and the excuses you guys come up with for Trump's behavior just proves Hillary was 100% right about Trump and Trump supporters. You and Trump do NOT get a free pass on this, tough **** for both of you.


He was mocking Biden while making goo-goo eyes at Kim. He expressed glee at Kim mocking Biden.

He sucks up to murderous dictators while trashing actual American heroes such as Mueller and McCain. Some of his attacks on patriotic Americans occurred when he was overseas.

As you say, not "conciliatory". Not diplomatic. Outright admiration from one horrible man to another, both acting against America's interests.
 
If you see anyone doing that point it out.

Your comments show it. You excuse any action by trump including him praising a murderous dictator.
 
Your opinion is noted and has been given the same consideration I gave the dog dropping on the sidewalk.

It’s not opinion, it’s FACT

It’s a FACT that trump praised a murderous dictator.

It’s a FACT you have excused it.
 
Your backpeddling left even deeper skid marks with the larger font :roll:

No fixation...just directly addressing the OP with the logical progression of wondering how we'd condemn NK...with a leader who's in love with their leader.

If Obama said the things about Un that Trump said, they'd be going nuts.
 
If Obama said the things about Un that Trump said, they'd be going nuts.

Didnt the right freak out when he hugged or kissed, as was tradition, one of the Saudis? :roll:
 
Interesting that I haven't received a response to this:

From the article you linked:After Years Of Abuse By Priests, #NunsToo Are Speaking Out

It's very hard for a nun to report she has been raped by a priest, says Scaraffia, because of the mindset that, in sex, women can always say no.

...

"These poor women are forced to leave their order and live alone raising their child with no help," she says. "Sometimes they're forced to have abortions — paid by the priest because nuns have no money."

After Years Of Abuse By Priests, #NunsToo Are Speaking Out : NPR
 
Last edited:
The walls of hell are lined with priest and nuns...
 
What I don't doubt at all is that you have even the slightest interest in this human rights abuse except as an opportunity.

I'll repeat myself: You don't have the slightest interest in this human rights tragedy. And are crapping up my thread with your juvenile whataboutism. You'll get no feel from me.

Check it out, everyone. A tRump supporter is trying to lecture us on human rights. :lol:
 
Check it out, everyone. A tRump supporter is trying to lecture us on human rights. :lol:

Yet another person who has not the slightest real interest in this ongoing tragedy.

But I'll bite, Phys, and reply that I respect the Office of the Presidency and both support and feel free to criticize Presidential policies no matter who the President is. I just don't like stupid terms such as "Obummer" and "tRump" and dislike even more stupid petty, two-minute-hate threads.

"Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people." Eleanor Roosevelt
 
Yet another person who has not the slightest real interest in this ongoing tragedy.

But I'll bite, Phys, and reply that I respect the Office of the Presidency and both support and feel free to criticize Presidential policies no matter who the President is. I just don't like stupid terms such as "Obummer" and "tRump" and dislike even more stupid petty, two-minute-hate threads.

"Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people." Eleanor Roosevelt

You were the one who brought up human rights, nota. The least you could do is acknowledge the hypocrisy of comdemning NK's human rights abuses while voting to look the other way from our own. :(
 
You were the one who brought up human rights, nota. The least you could do is acknowledge the hypocrisy of comdemning NK's human rights abuses while voting to look the other way from our own. :(

I like sticking to a topic. The topic is not Trump or American policies.
 
I like sticking to a topic. The topic is not Trump or American policies.

If you don't want to take the time to understand how one needs to be consistent in their opinion in order to have that opinion respected, that's your problem, not mine. Maybe you think you can get away with your selective outrage about human rights abuses halfway around the world while you enable with your vote the ones right here at home, but not all of us are that gullible.

In short, judge not, lest ye be judged.
 
I like sticking to a topic. The topic is not Trump or American policies.

I did comply with the request in your OP:

Let the entire civilized world condemn North Korea for these horrific and ongoing human rights abuses.

But doesnt that start with the leaders of those civilized countries? Who have the actual power to initiate pressure and condemnation? I was pointing out the public statements our "leader" has made with regards to NK, including a refusal to discuss their human rights abuses.

Perhaps you can explain what you would like to see discussed?
 
I did comply with the request in your OP:



But doesnt that start with the leaders of those civilized countries? Who have the actual power to initiate pressure and condemnation? I was pointing out the public statements our "leader" has made with regards to NK, including a refusal to discuss their human rights abuses.

Perhaps you can explain what you would like to see discussed?

Exactly. When she was talking about letting the entire civilized world condemn NK for these abuses....I would think the Donald Trump would be our spokesperson. Just standard citizens condemning NK, it takes leaders speaking out and possibly putting some muscle behind it. Of course Trump is part of this issue.
 
Back
Top Bottom