And you still refused to answer my questions. Why is that? Please do, as you have agreed to do so.
Here you go, for reference:
You dont know how to define 'potential?' Exactly, that is the beauty of it, if you call uncertainty, unquantifiable, 'beauty.' What point are you trying to make there? Isnt something that we have, that's present, actualized, contributing to society more valuable than something that may never be realized? And isnt it more worth protecting?
And I listed "what we know," so why are you asking that again? If you disagree, explain why.
Also, the matter of 'the one seeking abortion' has zero importance when, as in our society, the choice is up to each individual. The universal factor is that choice. That is what we know and that is all that matters.
And here's "what we do know" for your reference and perhaps you will answer that question now as well since I am presenting the list again?
We do know something about the woman...she's a contributing member of society (unless she's comatose and hospitalized). And it's not hard to imagine that they have responsibilities and obligations to family, employer, church, community, society, etc. that they experience joy and pain and passion and fear and all the normal things that people do. And thus that an unplanned child jeopardizes all those things, including her health.
What do you know about the one seeking the abortion? You clearly imply "we" know something...so what do you know?
