• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W: 594] A great question for pro abortion types

Re: A great question for pro abortion types

smallvoice said:
Sorry, one cannot walk away from a “joint venture” just because she thinks she has the heavier burden in the venture. That happens all the time in joint ventures, and in this case, she knew full well the burden she might be asked to carry. Try to dodge out in a business deal, which is what you folks think it is, and see how fast you end up responsible for your actions.
Click to expand...

Sure a woman can walk away from a "joint venture," whether or not you approve of her doing so. She can do that by having an abortion if she decides she doesn't want to stay pregnant and give birth. The guy doesn't -- and shouldn't -- decide what to do about a pregnancy, whether it's to continue a pregnancy or to abort one. It is her body that will be affected by a possible pregnancy, therefore it is her decision whether or not to continue it, not his.
 
Re: A great question for pro abortion types

smallvoice said:
As long as we are having this conversation, it is absolutely demanded that she explain her reason.
Click to expand...

You and other prolifers can "demand she explain her reason" all you want. The thing is, no woman has to "explain" or "justify" her reasons for having an abortion to you or anyone else. Her reason(s) for doing so are her own. Therefore, you're not entitled to know them.
 
Re: A great question for pro abortion types

smallvoice said:
Sorry, one cannot walk away from a “joint venture” just because she thinks she has the heavier burden in the venture. That happens all the time in joint ventures, and in this case, she knew full well the burden she might be asked to carry. Try to dodge out in a business deal, which is what you folks think it is, and see how fast you end up responsible for your actions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
There is no joint venture. Pregnancy only involves the woman. If she chooses to have the child, any obligation of the father comes after birth. It is not a legal or business arrangement.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Re: A great question for pro abortion types

roguenuke said:
There is no joint venture. Pregnancy only involves the woman. If she chooses to have the child, any obligation of the father comes after birth. It is not a legal or business arrangement.
Click to expand...

Exactly. A man doesn't -- and shouldn't -- get to dictate what a woman does when a pregnancy happens, whether she continues the pregnancy or decides to abort it.
 
Re: A great question for pro abortion types

smallvoice said:
Sorry, one cannot walk away from a “joint venture” just because she thinks she has the heavier burden in the venture. That happens all the time in joint ventures, and in this case, she knew full well the burden she might be asked to carry. Try to dodge out in a business deal, which is what you folks think it is, and see how fast you end up responsible for your actions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Except a pregnancy/parenthood isn't a business but someone's life. And women who have an abortion take responsibility for their unwanted pregnancies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom