• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Four Fallacies of Abortion

Havent we already covered that I'm not familiar enough with your PeeWee Herman references? Now if that is his M.O., you do seem to have your bases covered.
You're not posting in earnest, ma'am. You're playing games. Like some others here I could name.
I'm a serious and sincere poster, and I have little tolerance for your brand of "playfulness," shall we say.
Please put me on ignore or pick someone else for your daily play dates. I am not interested in your games.
Thank you and goodbye.
 
Havent we already covered that I'm not familiar enough with your PeeWee Herman references? Now if that is his M.O., you do seem to have your bases covered.

I myself, know next to nothing about PeeWee Herman, I recognize the name, but that’s about it and frankly...
I don’t want to know about him.

I don’t understand the fascination about him.
 
You're not posting in earnest, ma'am. You're playing games. Like some others here I could name.
I'm a serious and sincere poster, and I have little tolerance for your brand of "playfulness," shall we say.
Please put me on ignore or pick someone else for your daily play dates. I am not interested in your games.
Thank you and goodbye.

Yes because your continued references to 2nd rate comedians is somehow 'posting in earnest.' :doh
 
I myself, know next to nothing about PeeWee Herman, I recognize the name, but that’s about it and frankly...
I don’t want to know about him.

I don’t understand the fascination about him.
About Pee Wee Herman and morality and logic as well.

Here, I'll explain it to you.
Lursa's replies are often of the variety captured by the childish chant "I know you are but what am I," a childish chant identified with the pop cultural icon of incongruous childishness, Pee Wee Herman.

Get it?
 
About Pee Wee Herman and morality and logic as well.

Here, I'll explain it to you.
Lursa's replies are often of the variety captured by the childish chant "I know you are but what am I," a childish chant identified with the pop cultural icon of incongruous childishness, Pee Wee Herman.

Get it?

I see that your understanding of how to defend your arguments on the Internet is so obtuse and incompetent that you cannot even determine that an opponent asking you directly to actually defend your argument is not as you mischaracterize above. That you dont understand this explains a lot. That you have not learned thru all these threads is a seriously pathetic exposure of your intellect.
 
I see that your understanding of how to defend your arguments on the Internet is so obtuse and incompetent that you cannot even determine that an opponent asking you directly to actually defend your argument is not as you mischaracterize above. That you dont understand this explains a lot. That you have not learned thru all these threads is a seriously pathetic exposure of your intellect.
Quit the personal remarks and post better.
 
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. But I really wish you'd go pester somebody else.

If you are done trying to defend your arguments, just say so. Accept that you were unable to do so successfully and move on. Otherwise, we are willing to continue to see you try.
 
If you are done trying to defend your arguments, just say so. Accept that you were unable to do so successfully and move on. Otherwise, we are willing to continue to see you try.
I'm done playing your games, and I've already said so.
 
I'm done playing your games, and I've already said so.

I've continually tried to engage in constructive discussion...you have not. You now post more snippy little personal attacks than discussion...in your own OP threads :doh
 
I've continually tried to engage in constructive discussion...you have not. You now post more snippy little personal attacks than discussion...in your own OP threads :doh
Keep telling yourself that, ma'am. And Quag will keep "liking" your posts.
All our posts are on record, and I'll let the record speak for itself.
 
Keep telling yourself that, ma'am. And Quag will keep "liking" your posts.
All our posts are on record, and I'll let the record speak for itself.

The posting records clearly indicate your posted stance that ---> /// abortion must remain legal /// is no doubt diametrically opposed to the RCC's official stance on abortion. Correct ?
 
The posting records clearly indicate your posted stance that ---> /// abortion must remain legal /// is no doubt diametrically opposed to the RCC's official stance on abortion. Correct ?
And your posting record precedes you. Enough said.
 
Numbers 5:20-28

But if you have gone astray while married to your husband and you have made yourself impure by having sexual relations with a man other than your husband”— 21 here the priest is to put the woman under this curse—“may the Lord cause you to become a curse[d] among your people when he makes your womb miscarry and your abdomen swell. 22 May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries.”

“‘Then the woman is to say, “Amen. So be it.”

23 “‘The priest is to write these curses on a scroll and then wash them off into the bitter water. 24 He shall make the woman drink the bitter water that brings a curse, and this water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering will enter her. 25 The priest is to take from her hands the grain offering for jealousy, wave it before the Lord and bring it to the altar. 26 The priest is then to take a handful of the grain offering as a memorial[e] offering and burn it on the altar; after that, he is to have the woman drink the water. 27 If she has made herself impure and been unfaithful to her husband, this will be the result: When she is made to drink the water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering, it will enter her, her abdomen will swell and her womb will miscarry, and she will become a curse. 28 If, however, the woman has not made herself impure, but is clean, she will be cleared of guilt and will be able to have children.

Seems the sky daddy approves of terminating certain pregnancies.


Wow ... I need to remember that one.
 
And your posting record precedes you. Enough said.

It sure does, and like so many others have noted, unlike yourself, I don't run and hide from fair questions like you often do. Is your 'posted' stance that ---> /// abortion must remain legal /// compatible with your Roman Catholic Church's official Vatican stance on abortion ? YES or NO. ( answer or dodge ? )
 
It sure does, and like so many others have noted, unlike yourself, I don't run and hide from fair questions like you often do. Is your 'posted' stance that ---> /// abortion must remain legal /// compatible with your Roman Catholic Church's official Vatican stance on abortion ? YES or NO. ( answer or dodge ? )
You are making this personal.
 
You are making this personal.

You have a nasty little habit of sticking your nose where it doesn't belong, and your thinking is flawed. It's a fair question about abortion in the abortion forum.
 
You have a nasty little habit of sticking your nose where it doesn't belong, and your thinking is flawed. It's a fair question about abortion in the abortion forum.
You posted that in an open forum, everybody can see your post and respond to it.
 
You posted that in an open forum, everybody can see your post and respond to it.

Correct. And your post in the open forum, by the very same token, can be, and was responded to with truthfulness.
 
It sure does, and like so many others have noted, unlike yourself, I don't run and hide from fair questions like you often do. Is your 'posted' stance that ---> /// abortion must remain legal /// compatible with your Roman Catholic Church's official Vatican stance on abortion ? YES or NO. ( answer or dodge ? )
Let's just say again, keeping a civil tongue in our head, that your posting record precedes you. Or as Hamlet, of his uncle, says: "So, uncle, there you are!"
Or to paraphrase a great line from the Bible: "By their posts shall ye know them."
You get the picture.
Can you take a hint?
If you're a Last Worder, get it in and then begone.
 
Let's just say again, keeping a civil tongue in our head, that your posting record precedes you. Or as Hamlet, of his uncle, says: "So, uncle, there you are!"
Or to paraphrase a great line from the Bible: "By their posts shall ye know them."
You get the picture.
Can you take a hint?
If you're a Last Worder, get it in and then begone.

Don't want your conflicting posts in a debate forum being fairly questioned/confronted ? Don't put forth conflicting posts. Your posts are as open to being fairly questioned/confronted as anyone else's here at this site.
 
Don't want your conflicting posts in a debate forum being fairly questioned/confronted ? Don't put forth conflicting posts. Your posts are as open to being fairly questioned/confronted as anyone else's here at this site.

But this thread is not about whether Angel can reconcile his personal beliefs with the Church's official stances, though.
 
Back
Top Bottom