• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Four Fallacies of Abortion

prometeus said:
What you post.
Click to expand...

Ironic that this came from you

Also, Angel is right (again). People should be talking about the subject of the thread, instead of talking to each other about posters. This is against the rules here, I believe.
 
prometeus said:
Yet you still have to refute a single thing I said.
Click to expand...
You haven't said anything worth being refuted.

You think you are debating. Haha.

So it is safe to say that your posts fall in the same category.
Click to expand...
Do you agree or disagree that posters should not be talking to each other about another poster here on this board?
 
prometeus said:
Yet you still haven't been able to refute anything.
Click to expand...

Do you think posters here should be talking to one another about another poster?
 
Lursa said:
You mean like you talking about Angel?
Click to expand...
No, Wan might mention me, as I might mention her, with respect and affection.
When you say "talking about Angel" you can only be talking about your high guru of gossip and innuendo, Q himself.
Your prayer posts with Q provide a fascinating glimpse into the heart and soul of the Randian second-hander.
 
Some appears to be infatuated with me
 
Angel said:
No, Wan might mention me, as I might mention her, with respect and affection.
Click to expand...

Well Angel, to be more precise, when I mention you, I do it with respect, affection AND lust.

Would you like my stats, Angel? I am 5 foot 6.
 
 
Wan said:
Well Angel, to be more precise, when I mention you, I do it with respect, affection AND lust.

Would you like my stats, Angel? I am 5 foot 6.
Click to expand...

That's quite enough. Now put your eggs UP. UP, where I can see 'em! No eggs gonna die on my watch. No spermies, either.
 
Wan said:
Well Angel, to be more precise, when I mention you, I do it with respect, affection AND lust.

Would you like my stats, Angel? I am 5 foot 6.
Click to expand...
I ♥ Wan
 
Angel said:
No, Wan might mention me, as I might mention her, with respect and affection.
When you say "talking about Angel" you can only be talking about your high guru of gossip and innuendo, Q himself.
Your prayer posts with Q provide a fascinating glimpse into the heart and soul of the Randian second-hander.
Click to expand...

Please find an example where I 'talked about Quag.' You are just lying again.

Your little fan fest with Wan is amusing. In at least 4-5 threads and thousands of pages...she is pretty much the ONLY person that has agreed with your statements...which you claim are 'universal and self-evident.'

That alone proves your arguments failed.

:lamo :lamo :lamo
 
Lursa said:
Please find an example where I 'talked about Quag.' You are just lying again.
...
Click to expand...
Misreading right to the end, are you? I said your posts "with" Quag.

Here are two I found in a five-minute search:

Lursa said:
Quag said:
It isn't self evidence. Natural rights are nothing more than a belief some people hold
Now if you want to try and prove the existence of natural rights feel free to try but you will have as much success at that as you are having at this.
Ie no matter what "argument" you make it will be based on your personal opinion and thus any conclusion will be nothing more than your personal opinion.
Click to expand...
His own link proved it is not self-evident. :doh
Click to expand...

Lursa said:
Quag said:
They can, have, are and will be, proving that natural rights are nothing more than what people believe them to be


The fact that slavery was legal shows that my above statement is true. My belief in slavery being wrong has nothing to do with the legality of it, I look at it using the idea that one persons freedom ends where another's begins. I think that is a good way to look at these issues. Is it perfect? no.
Click to expand...
Or that the govt can, thru due process, take away someone's liberty or even life.

All rights are a man-made concept, including natural rights. There's no biological basis for that. It's often used by religious people as a workaround when they know they cant use religion in a discussion. But it's still an appeal to a higher authority.
Click to expand...

So who is lying, misreading, misrepresenting and in bad faith?
 
Angel said:
Misreading right to the end, are you? I said your posts "with" Quag.

Here are two I found in a five-minute search:





So who is lying, misreading, misrepresenting and in bad faith?
Click to expand...

I wasnt talking about Quag...I was using his/referring to his arguments in the discussion. There was nothing personal about Quag in there at all.

So, since you asked...you are (still) lying.
 
Lursa said:
I wasnt talking about Quag...I was using his/referring to his arguments in the discussion. There was nothing personal about Quag in there at all.

So, since you asked...you are (still) lying.
Click to expand...
No, you are still misreading, self-righteously as usual.
 
Angel said:
No, you are still misreading, self-righteously as usual.
Click to expand...

Where was any personal mention of Quag? There was none...only reference to his posts/arguments.

And yet, here you are exchanging personal info with Wan...the hypocrisy is laughable.
 
Lursa said:
Where was any personal mention of Quag? There was none...only reference to his posts/arguments.

And yet, here you are exchanging personal info with Wan...the hypocrisy is laughable.
Click to expand...

His stance that ///abortion must remain legal //// , which is diametrically opposed to the RCC's official stance on abortion, is also a head scratcher.
 
Lursa said:
And yet...still just comments about me and not your argument...which supposedly you should be able to support. Which you have not. Well, you tried once or twice and failed.

But still...discussion should be on your argument... not me. That's just evidence you are unable to continue with your argument.
Click to expand...
Then stick to the business of discussing and quit this sort of constipated crowing:
And failed once again to support your claims....100% fail...again.

You are 100% incapable of continuing to argue your stance. Hence your bobbing and weaving and lack of support for your argument.
Click to expand...
 
Angel said:
Then stick to the business of discussing and quit this sort of constipated crowing:
Click to expand...

Sorry if the truth hurts...there was no gloating, only matter of fact language*...you can always take it constructively and attempt to course correct your exceedingly poor arguing techniques.


*resorted to only because subtlety and even normal directness were not getting my message across.
 
Lursa said:
Sorry if the truth hurts...there was no gloating, only matter of fact language*...you can always take it constructively and attempt to course correct your exceedingly poor arguing techniques.


*resorted to only because subtlety and even normal directness were not getting my message across.
Click to expand...
This sort of PeeWeeHerman I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I silliness is all you've got apparently. Are ypu ready to chalk up another victory by accepting another concession that hasn't been made?
Pathetic.
 
Angel said:
This sort of PeeWeeHerman I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I silliness is all you've got apparently. Are ypu ready to chalk up another victory by accepting another concession that hasn't been made?
Pathetic.
Click to expand...

Havent we already covered that I'm not familiar enough with your PeeWee Herman references? Now if that is his M.O., you do seem to have your bases covered.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom