Life is life. Human life is human life. The distinctions you draw are based on your politics.
I did not say the sperm is not living matter. Read my post again.
Whether I "have a clue" is not important. And the reason I did not try to define it is because I am not an expert on this, and further, you would not believe me anyway. If you really want to know what defines an organism, you should ask an authority on this matter.
Let's keep incivility out of this thread.
You said that it is not alive. What does it mean then?
But it is because you are attempting to use it as reasoning when you are clueless about it. That is dishonest in the least and demonstrates yet again that you are clueless.
Then why the **** do you offer it as evidence?
I believe verifiable facts.
Integrity in posting is part of civility and you clearly lack even a modicum of it.
I meant exactly what I said. The state of being alive (or dead, as the case might be), only applies to organisms. Sperm cannot be said to be alive (or dead). But they can be said to be living matter.
Thank you for sharing your opinion, which is subjective (do you know what this means?)
I am not aware that I tried to offer something as "evidence".
What qualifies as an organism is not a matter of fact, but a matter of definition. But I see you like to throw the word "fact" around a lot.
1. Prove I have no integrity.
Then a lot of posters in this forum should be infracted, too. I have seen that thread created by Angel. A lot of pro-choicers were making fun of him. Maybe not you personally but quite a few from your side.
To you only. To the rest of us who actually have a good grasp of English, it's not the same.
You are babbling incoherently only further demonstrating ignorance and lack of knowledge.
Not opinion, fact.
Because you have no clue what you are talking about.
What the **** is that supposed to mean? Something either is ir is not something and either case becomes fact once established.
And you avoid it at all costs.
Your post are ample evidence.
No, it only makes sense to ask for proof when people make claims that need to be backed up. But with you, you say "sez who" when people tell you things that are commonly understood social conventions or things that are known to most adults but which are nevertheless not explicitly written down. This is childish. It's like telling a child it's bad manner to pick his nose in public and he says, "sez who?". You are him.
Ok, you have a point. So allow me to retract my statement. Instead, I will simply tell you, that you are wrong to think "human" means "human being".
