• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:560] Abortion 101

Quag said:
The first post of mine in this thread!!!
Are you really that dim?
Click to expand...
Already. That's the last personal remark I'm taking from you. Our conversations are over. Troll someone else.
 
year2late said:
It is not settled. It may be settled in your mind...but that is inconsequential for the rest of us. Your belief need not apply to everyone else.

Perhaps if you put it in bold and caps and enlarged the text your opinion might matter to the argument. But probably not.;)
Click to expand...
I have an valid and sound argument. You stomp your feet and stick your tongue out. I'll rest content with my way, thank you: reason and logic.
 
Angel said:
I have an valid and sound argument. You stomp your feet and stick your tongue out. I'll rest content with my way, thank you: reason and logic.
Click to expand...

I disagree.

Your statement “Except where the pregnant woman's life is at risk, abortion is immoral.”

It is not only false. It goes against soul competency and the best interests of the woman’s family.

Morals help protect families and society as a whole.

When a woman has abortion , there is no adverse affect on society.


As I posted before it is moral for a woman to choose an abortion in the best interest of her family ( present or future).

Many others have also made that point and you just choose to ignore their posts.

You stomp your feet and stick your tongue out and claim you are right.
 
Angel said:
Already. That's the last personal remark I'm taking from you. Our conversations are over. Troll someone else.
Click to expand...
There we go Angel is running away while flasley claiming I am trolling him when all I am doing is pointing out the flaw in his OP
 
Last edited:
Angel said:
I have an valid and sound argument. You stomp your feet and stick your tongue out. I'll rest content with my way, thank you: reason and logic.
Click to expand...

No you dont, you have a claim you cannot back up
 
Last edited:
Angel said:
I have an valid and sound argument. You stomp your feet and stick your tongue out. I'll rest content with my way, thank you: reason and logic.
Click to expand...

Having what you consider to be a valid and sound argument does not mean something is settled....except in your mind.
 
year2late said:
Having what you consider to be a valid and sound argument does not mean something is settled....except in your mind.
Click to expand...
A valid and sound argument should settle the thing in the mind of any rational human being.
 
AGENT J said:
:lamo

Prove it

:popcorn2:
Click to expand...
Been there, done that.
Angel said:
The Argument

The taking of a human life for any reason other than self-defense is immoral.

Except where the pregnant woman's life is at risk, abortion is immoral.

But human beings have a right to be immoral.

Therefore women have a right to be immoral.

Therefore women have a right to abort pregnancies.

​

That's the issue settled morally.
Morally, one may be both pro-life and pro-choice.
...
Click to expand...
 
Quag said:
Over Under on him claiming he already has?
Click to expand...

LOL its guaranteed but im not interested in feelings lies and or opinions ;)
 
Angel said:
Been there, done that.
Click to expand...

where? theres nothing in there about morals that PROVES your claimi in anyway LMAO, not one single fact

Angel said:
The Argument

1.) The taking of a human life for any reason other than self-defense is immoral.
2.)Except where the pregnant woman's life is at risk, abortion is immoral.
3.)But human beings have a right to be immoral.
4.)Therefore women have a right to be immoral.
5.) Therefore women have a right to abort pregnancies.


6.) That's the issue settled morally.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

1.) opinion, disagree factually prove otherwise
2.) opinion, disagree factually prove otherwise
3.) opinion, disagree factually prove otherwise
4.) opinion, disagree factually prove otherwise
5.) opinion, disagree factually prove otherwise
6.) factually wrong, opinions dont settle arguments

ill ask you again . . prove your claim, thanks!
 
AGENT J said:
where? theres nothing in there about morals that PROVES your claimi in anyway LMAO, not one single fact
1.) opinion, disagree factually prove otherwise
2.) opinion, disagree factually prove otherwise
3.) opinion, disagree factually prove otherwise
4.) opinion, disagree factually prove otherwise
5.) opinion, disagree factually prove otherwise
6.) factually wrong, opinions dont settle arguments

ill ask you again . . prove your claim, thanks!
Click to expand...
Yours is an opinion, AJ; mine is an argument.
 
Angel said:
Yours is an opinion, AJ; mine is an argument.
Click to expand...

LMAO thats what I thought you cant support your lies and opinion with one fact that makes them true.

If you disagree please do so now, post one fact that makes your claims true .. . one . . you cant because lies were once again exposed for all to see!

:popcorn2:
 
Angel said:
Yours is an opinion, AJ; mine is an argument.
Click to expand...

Stringing together a bunch of unproven statements doesnt prove anything.
Your claim that the morality is settled is false and demonstrably so
 
Last edited:
AGENT J said:
where? theres nothing in there about morals that PROVES your claimi in anyway LMAO, not one single fact



1.) opinion, disagree factually prove otherwise
2.) opinion, disagree factually prove otherwise
3.) opinion, disagree factually prove otherwise
4.) opinion, disagree factually prove otherwise
5.) opinion, disagree factually prove otherwise
6.) factually wrong, opinions dont settle arguments

ill ask you again . . prove your claim, thanks!
Click to expand...
Exactly why the OP is a big massive pile of FAIL.
However Angel doesn't like it when you challenge his claims, if you press him on the issue he will demand you prove your claim that his claim is wrong

Logic is a foreign concept to him
 
minnie616 said:
Repeating a flawed arument is not proof.
Click to expand...
What flaw do you find in my argument, minnie?
Btw, why did you vanish when we started to build your argument?
You have one premise: Pre-viability the brain of the unborn functions at the same level as the brain of post-natal human being declared brain-dead.

You need a second premise now, ideally one that has as its subject the human being declared brain-dead.
 
minnie616 said:
Repeating a flawed arument is not proof.
Click to expand...

basic common sense and honesty but some people ignore facts and the fact is the OP complete fails it has been proven to be lies or topical ignorance . . one or the other and its hilarious :)
 
Angel said:
What flaw do you find in my argument, minnie?
....
Click to expand...

Did you miss post 303 of this this thread where I pointed out your flawed arugument?

I pointed your Except where the pregnant woman's life is at risk, abortion is immoral is flawed.

Morals help protect families and society as a whole.

As I posted before it is moral good for a woman to choose an abortion in the best interest of her family ( present or future).
 
minnie616 said:
Did you miss post 303 of this this thread where I pointed out your flawed arugument?

I pointed your Except where the pregnant woman's life is at risk, abortion is immoral is flawed.

Morals help protect families and society as a whole.

As I posted before it is moral good for a woman to choose an abortion in the best interest of her family ( present or future).
Click to expand...
No, I didn't miss #303, minnie.
#303 doesn't present a flaw in my argument; it presents a flaw in your morality.
Taking a human life based on "the best interest of her family" is mafia reasoning.
 
Angel said:
I have an valid and sound argument.
Click to expand...
No dear, you have delusion and rants devoid of anything intelligent and rational and are under the impression that repeating your tripe somehow ads validity to it.
 
Angel said:
No, I didn't miss #303, minnie.
#303 doesn't present a flaw in my argument; it presents a flaw in your morality.
Taking a human life based on "the best interest of her family" is mafia reasoning.
Click to expand...

morals are subjective hence your OP complete fails and has been destroyed by facts and muitiple posters for the factually wrong nonsense it is :)
 
Angel said:
No, I didn't miss #303, minnie.
#303 doesn't present a flaw in my argument; it presents a flaw in your morality.
Taking a human life based on "the best interest of her family" is mafia reasoning.
Click to expand...

Balony.



Over 60 percent of women who have an abortion already have at least one born child whom they are raising.

That child or children are depending on their mother to be around to help raise them.

The vast vast majority of women who are mothers or who want to become a mother want to be alive and employed ( if they rely on their job to support the family ) to raise their child/children.
 
Last edited:
Angel said:
No, I didn't miss #303, minnie.
#303 doesn't present a flaw in my argument; it presents a flaw in your morality.
Taking a human life based on "the best interest of her family" is mafia reasoning.
Click to expand...

Who says 'taking a human life' is wrong?

This was a recent claim of yours:

Angel said:
It is axiomatic that all human beings have a right to life.
Click to expand...

Who says?

Axiomatic: Self-evident or unquestionable.

axiomatic | Definition of axiomatic in English by Oxford Dictionaries
Click to expand...

Not any national or international human rights organizations (religious ones excepted). None of them recognize rights for the unborn. (And we all agree that the unborn are human and alive?)

Not the multiple Supreme Courts and justices that ruled on that exact thing either.

So apparently, it's not 'axiomatic'

So...who says?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom