• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:560] Abortion 101

Angel said:
People often cling to mistaken views out of pride, close-mindedness, lack of critical thinking, etc.
Click to expand...



Most accurate and unintentional self description of the week award goes to......
 
Angel said:
Like you Pee Wee's counter-argument whenever criticized was: "I know you are but what am I?"
Click to expand...

Once again:

Lursa said:
I gladly admit that you know more about that character...who's low-brow comedy and perversions apparently were attractive to you.
Click to expand...
 
Quag said:
...

False because your claim that everything is dependent on the mind or on perception is absurdly false
Click to expand...
Let's have an argument supporting this claim of yours.
 
Angel said:
Once again: you're confusing a character with the actor.
Click to expand...

Once again: the fact that you even know that proves my statement:

I gladly admit that you know more about that character...who's low-brow comedy and perversions apparently were attractive to you.
Click to expand...
 
Angel said:
Let's have an argument supporting this claim of yours.
Click to expand...

Pathetic attempt at reversal of burden of proof.
We all know you cant back up false claim
 
Quag said:
Pathetic attempt at reversal of burden of proof.
We all know you cant back up false claim
Click to expand...
You made a claim, namely, that subjective idealism is absurd and false. Let's have your argument.
 
Angel said:
You made a claim, namely, that subjective idealism is absurd and false. Let's have your argument.
Click to expand...

No I rejected your claim. The original claim was by you. You need to defend it but you cant so you are desperately trying to reverse the burden of proof

I notice you are studiously avoiding the fact that your new arguments destroy your own OP, but dont worry I wont forget ;)
 
Quag said:
No I rejected your claim. The original claim was by you. You need to defend it but you cant so you are desperately trying to reverse the burden of proof

I notice you are studiously avoiding the fact that your new arguments destroy your own OP, but dont worry I wont forget ;)
Click to expand...
You made a counterclaim. Support it.
 
Angel said:
You made a counterclaim. Support it.
Click to expand...

You made a claim support it. (Don't worry I know you cannot because it is false)
I notice you are studiously avoiding the fact that your new arguments destroy your own OP, but dont worry I wont forget
 
Quag said:
You made a claim support it. (Don't worry I know you cannot because it is false)
I notice you are studiously avoiding the fact that your new arguments destroy your own OP, but dont worry I wont forget
Click to expand...
I am supporting my claim in post after post.
I'm not avoiding anything 00 You're just making another claim ("that your new arguments destroy your own OP" -- that you won't support.
 
prometeus said:
Do not delude yourself. The tripe you post does not support anything other than indication of lack of knowledge and wilful ignorance.
Click to expand...

^^^ This...
 
Angel said:
I am supporting my claim in post after post.
Click to expand...
No you aren't you are just posting nonsense that actually goes against your own OP.
I'm not avoiding anything 00 You're just making another claim ("that your new arguments destroy your own OP" -- that you won't support.
Click to expand...

Sure you are you made a claim and like all your arguments you want the premise to be accepted as fact without any need to back it up.
Sorry I wont play your silly illogic games. Your OP is flawed the morality is not settled and even you agree that morals are subjective which means it is not settled.
 
there sure are a lot of un-aborted babies expressing their opinions in here!
I think we should have post birth abortions for people who dont meet societal stanards at certain age periods.
For example, if you have no college degree by age 26 after attending college or no marketable skill to maintain a level of income to support yourself, I say you qualify for post birth abortion and the very procedure used on partialy birthed humans is the way you go.
I also think that everyone who approves of abortion or who is involved in the need of an abortion should watch the procedure and the results of it until the remains are removed from the facility.
I also believe that the male and female involved in the need of said abortion should register as irresponsible adults so as not to involve others in the need for other abortions.
this post is both as resonable and rational as the rest of it
 
MeThePeople said:
there sure are a lot of un-aborted babies expressing their opinions in here!
I think we should have post birth abortions for people who dont meet societal stanards at certain age periods.
For example, if you have no college degree by age 26 after attending college or no marketable skill to maintain a level of income to support yourself, I say you qualify for post birth abortion and the very procedure used on partialy birthed humans is the way you go.
I also think that everyone who approves of abortion or who is involved in the need of an abortion should watch the procedure and the results of it until the remains are removed from the facility.
I also believe that the male and female involved in the need of said abortion should register as irresponsible adults so as not to involve others in the need for other abortions.
this post is both as resonable and rational as the rest of it
Click to expand...

I see little of substance in your post, and some not very solid conclusions.

For instance, there are at least 5 people now that have posted here that they wish their mother had aborted them. And this sub-forum is a pretty small sampling of America...so then that's a very significant number.

Makes smart people think twice anyway, about blanket generalizations on the issue.

When the majority of couples are using birth control (yes we have the stats) and thus...not being irresponsible, what do you think Americans should do? Stop having sex? Have a child they dont want or cant afford and put it up for adoption (when there are already over 100,000 kids in the US already waiting to be adopted?). Have a kid they dont want or cant afford and keep it? Have an abortion?

Lots of choices eh? It's handy that "pro-choice" is the law of the land.
 
Quag said:
No you aren't you are just posting nonsense that actually goes against your own OP.


Sure you are you made a claim and like all your arguments you want the premise to be accepted as fact without any need to back it up.
Sorry I wont play your silly illogic games. Your OP is flawed the morality is not settled and even you agree that morals are subjective which means it is not settled.
Click to expand...
Make tour argument or stop wasting bandwidth with your blustery posts.
 
Angel said:
Make tour argument or stop wasting bandwidth with your blustery posts.
Click to expand...

Why dont you actually back up your claims instead of wasting bandwidth?
Oh yeah I forgot you cant

So back to the original flawed Op the claim that the morality is settled is false as morals are subjective.
 
Angel said:
That, and the other.
If you have something to say, then say it.
Click to expand...

Funny you have nothing to say and yet you wont shut up!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom