• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Child Separation Good; Abortion Bad

calamity

calamity

Privileged
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
160,900
Reaction score
57,844
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
Can anyone explain this dichotomy?

Support stripping kids from their parents, but let's deny women the right to choose not being a parent. How does that make sense?

And, while we are at discussing this kind of thing. Explain this to me too, please.

It's good to shoot an intruder, who invades your home--apparently, god approves of that--but vacuum out an intrusion into a uterus and Wooo, off to hell you should go.

What is up with that?
 
calamity said:
Can anyone explain this dichotomy?

Support stripping kids from their parents, but let's deny women the right to choose not being a parent. How does that make sense?

And, while we are at discussing this kind of thing. Explain this to me too, please.

It's good to shoot an intruder, who invades your home--apparently, god approves of that--but vacuum out an intrusion into a uterus and Wooo, off to hell you should go.

What is up with that?
Click to expand...
I agree that there is some contradictions but that same argument can be just as easily flipped on you.

Abortion is fine
Separating children and capital punishment is inhumane

While I dont share the lock n step the rights views on this topic I will present it if your prepared to defend the conflicts on the lefts stance

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
calamity said:
Can anyone explain this dichotomy?

Support stripping kids from their parents, but let's deny women the right to choose not being a parent. How does that make sense?

And, while we are at discussing this kind of thing. Explain this to me too, please.

It's good to shoot an intruder, who invades your home--apparently, god approves of that--but vacuum out an intrusion into a uterus and Wooo, off to hell you should go.

What is up with that?
Click to expand...

It is simple... a fetus/baby is invading the woman's body... she has every right to destroy it just like an intruder invading your home.
 
trouble13 said:
I agree that there is some contradictions but that same argument can be just as easily flipped on you.

Abortion is fine
Separating children and capital punishment is inhumane

While I dont share the lock n step the rights views on this topic I will present it if your prepared to defend the conflicts on the lefts stance

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I'm pro-capital punishment and certainly in favor of shooting intruders. As for stripping living, breathing children from their parents, that in no way compares to aborting a mindless fetus which doesn't even know its alive.
 
calamity said:
Can anyone explain this dichotomy?

Support stripping kids from their parents, but let's deny women the right to choose not being a parent. How does that make sense?

And, while we are at discussing this kind of thing. Explain this to me too, please.

It's good to shoot an intruder, who invades your home--apparently, god approves of that--but vacuum out an intrusion into a uterus and Wooo, off to hell you should go.

What is up with that?
Click to expand...

You do realize that millions of kids are "stripped" from their parents in this country? If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.
 
calamity said:
I'm pro-capital punishment and certainly in favor of shooting intruders. As for stripping living, breathing children from their parents, that in no way compares to aborting a mindless fetus which doesn't even know its alive.
Click to expand...
Explain why. I'm interested in how you differentiate things.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
calamity said:
Can anyone explain this dichotomy?

Support stripping kids from their parents, but let's deny women the right to choose not being a parent. How does that make sense?

And, while we are at discussing this kind of thing. Explain this to me too, please.

It's good to shoot an intruder, who invades your home--apparently, god approves of that--but vacuum out an intrusion into a uterus and Wooo, off to hell you should go.

What is up with that?
Click to expand...

Can you please explain what "stripping kids from parents' is?

What political issue are you discussing? What laws are we discussing? Under which conditions is this occuring?
 
calamity said:
It's good to shoot an intruder, who invades your home--apparently, god approves of that--but vacuum out an intrusion into a uterus and Wooo, off to hell you should go.

What is up with that?
Click to expand...

It shows just how messed up you are to compare a criminal breaking into your home with an innocent child in the womb. Your child of all things.

Wanna stop intrusions in your uterus? Try closing it.
 
Lursa said:
Can you please explain what "stripping kids from parents' is?

What political issue are you discussing? What laws are we discussing? Under which conditions is this occuring?
Click to expand...

I’m referring to family separation policy at the border, which is supported by a vast number of anti-abortionists, especially evangelicals. Thanks for asking.
 
trouble13 said:
Explain why. I'm interested in how you differentiate things.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Explain why you responded to my post then.
 
Kal'Stang said:
You do realize that millions of kids are "stripped" from their parents in this country? If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.
Click to expand...
Sometimes for good reasons, like when some people terminate a pregnancy. Sometimes not.
 
Crusader13 said:
It shows just how messed up you are to compare a criminal breaking into your home with an innocent child in the womb. Your child of all things.

Wanna stop intrusions in your uterus? Try closing it.
Click to expand...

Don't like abortion? Try only screwing anti abortion women. Or wrapping it up.
 
Crusader13 said:
It shows just how messed up you are to compare a criminal breaking into your home with an innocent child in the womb. Your child of all things.

Wanna stop intrusions in your uterus? Try closing it.
Click to expand...

It is kinda messed up... the comparison is not analogous. A better comparison would be to compare an unwanted child in the womb with a squatter in your house. I think that squatters should also be shot...
 
calamity said:
Can anyone explain this dichotomy?

Support stripping kids from their parents, but let's deny women the right to choose not being a parent. How does that make sense?

And, while we are at discussing this kind of thing. Explain this to me too, please.

It's good to shoot an intruder, who invades your home--apparently, god approves of that--but vacuum out an intrusion into a uterus and Wooo, off to hell you should go.

What is up with that?
Click to expand...

An intruder? What a stupid comparison... a good one would be a squatter.
 
calamity said:
I’m referring to family separation policy at the border, which is supported by a vast number of anti-abortionists, especially evangelicals. Thanks for asking.
Click to expand...

ok
...
 
calamity said:
I’m referring to family separation policy at the border, which is supported by a vast number of anti-abortionists, especially evangelicals. Thanks for asking.
Click to expand...

When parents commit crimes they have to pay for their injustice and do the required time, the kids being stripped from their parents are the unfortunate consequences of the parents actions, it happens to thousands of American every day, we as a society except that the children cannot go to prison with their parents and they cannot fend for them selves so we give them to family or child protection services. As far a crossing the border goes, it is a crime a parents either get deported or go to prison then get deport after their sentence has been paid, their children instead of going to child protection services and foster care, since they are not americans and the program doesn't pay for all the worlds children on the back of American tax payers they get deported right along with their parents or deported to their next of kin back in their home country. That's vastly different then killing a child because the mother doesn't want it to live off her.
 
jdog21 said:
When parents commit crimes they have to pay for their injustice and do the required time, the kids being stripped from their parents are the unfortunate consequences of the parents actions, it happens to thousands of American every day, we as a society except that the children cannot go to prison with their parents and they cannot fend for them selves so we give them to family or child protection services. As far a crossing the border goes, it is a crime a parents either get deported or go to prison then get deport after their sentence has been paid, their children instead of going to child protection services and foster care, since they are not americans and the program doesn't pay for all the worlds children on the back of American tax payers they get deported right along with their parents or deported to their next of kin back in their home country. That's vastly different then killing a child because the mother doesn't want it to live off her.
Click to expand...

Is that kind of how kids in US have to fear being shot in school is the price of freedom?
 
calamity said:
Is that kind of how kids in US have to fear being shot in school is the price of freedom?
Click to expand...

Its a shame that school shootings have happened but kids in the US don't fear being shot in school, they are more likely to get killed by lightening walking to school then to be shot at on campus.
 
jdog21 said:
Its a shame that school shootings have happened but kids in the US don't fear being shot in school, they are more likely to get killed by lightening walking to school then to be shot at on campus.
Click to expand...

It’s a shame abortions happen, but fetuses are much more likely to be killed by miscarriage. Thanks for agreeing.
 
calamity said:
It’s a shame abortions happen, but fetuses are much more likely to be killed by miscarriage. Thanks for agreeing.
Click to expand...
Miscarriages are faultless incidents, abortions are deliberate and premeditated.
 
Most on the right loves a fetus, it's the kids they don't care for.
 
calamity said:
Can anyone explain this dichotomy?

Support stripping kids from their parents, but let's deny women the right to choose not being a parent. How does that make sense?

And, while we are at discussing this kind of thing. Explain this to me too, please.

It's good to shoot an intruder, who invades your home--apparently, god approves of that--but vacuum out an intrusion into a uterus and Wooo, off to hell you should go.

What is up with that?
Click to expand...

Why do you support Human trafficking? specifically, trafficking of children?

Children have to be separated because, since they're coming in illegally, we have NO IDEA who their "parents" are, if they are even their parents. They may be human traffickers because human traffickers do abduct children, and if you farther south than mexico, their trafficking in latin America is more and more common.

fbdfbfdb.jpg

This isn't a contradiction. The contradiction would be just letting children go wherever their "adult guardians" take them, because we have no idea what they're going to do with these children. The government must hold and keep watch over these children, humanely, until we can verify their parents/guardians. There are many cases in which, through this system, children have been saved from their human traffickers.
 
Last edited:
DarkWizard12 said:
Why do you support Human trafficking? specifically, trafficking of children?

Children have to be separated because, since they're coming in illegally, we have NO IDEA who their "parents" are, if they are even their parents. They may be human traffickers because human traffickers do abduct children, and if you farther south than mexico, their trafficking in latin America is more and more common.

View attachment 67250430

This isn't a contradiction. The contradiction would be just letting children go wherever their "adult guardians" take them, because we have no idea what they're going to do with these children. The government must hold and keep watch over these children, humanely, until we can verify their parents/guardians. There are many cases in which, through this system, children have been saved from their human traffickers.
Click to expand...

:roll:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom