- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 119,337
- Reaction score
- 75,247
- Location
- Outside Seattle
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Drs can use medical ethics to decline performing abortions now.If it was considered a restrictive medical procedure it allows for normal medical ethical guidelines. Doctors can use their medical ethics to determine medical rational with only extreme cases being a legal matter. Indivudal aborters found guilty of unjustified abortion would be sentenced to mandatory treatment. This similar to how one might treat laws surrounding suicide and child welfare.
The rest of your post does not address the violation of women's Constitutional rights and bodily sovereignty and self-determination. Legally or ethically.
Again, you are claiming rights and potential futures for the unborn at the expense of the mother. Why?
You are still demonstrating a value for the unborn superseding that of women.
No, I would argue the rights of the unborn are far more restrictive than that of an adult citizen or even a born child.That does not mean they are without rights. Children already have restricted rights. This is not a far out concept.
The unborn have zero rights in the US.