Nearly always. Take Rosenstein who says something about spying on Trump and colluding with staffers to find a way to remove him from office. When discovered he now claims he was just joking. We don't need such jokers in top Justice Department department leadership positions.
Actually, the yet to born (at least in mammals) don’t meet the scientific criteria of “parasite”. It’s sorta close, but but scientifically speaking, “close” isn’t enough.The closest claim that can be made is that the various stages of a developing life is that the possess “PARASITIC BEHAVIORS”.
The “parasite” perspective has been raised many times over the years that I’ve participated in this forum and it’s been researched thoroughly. So believe me that you are far from the first to make this claim. If you believe that I’ve truly erred, please feel free to correct me.
Thanks,
RM
Once again, Logician Man has been found to have pouted bs. This is not the first time and it won't be the last time.
Nearly always. Take Rosenstein who says something about spying on Trump and colluding with staffers to find a way to remove him from office. When discovered he now claims he was just joking. We don't need such jokers in top Justice Department department leadership positions.
You mean like your BS/false accusation/slanderous personal attack about me urinating in public and failing to zip up? I owned up to my error.Will you do the same?
You owned up to being wrong about the parasite part, but you have not apologized to me for attacking me personally. In that other thread, I was responding like a normal person but you attacked me and said I edited out my fallacious response. You started the whole thing. So let's see if YOU will apologize to ME first.
Your edit,which you admitted to making came very late in the convo,and in no way was a personal attack.It was a statement of fact...try again.
Interesting you still deflect. What was Flukes actual quote (the one that you interpreted as Fluke demanding $3000/month for birth control)
I am curious...you brought up Fluke.
Neither do we need self-professed sexual deviants as POTUS.
Prove it was a "statement of fact". And what does it "came very late in the convo" have to do with anything? You just can't and won't own up to the fact you attacked me first. Maybe not in a personal way strictly speaking, but you know and I know as well that you meant to attack. You did not address what I said in that post at all.
The only self-professed deviant I know is Spartacus Booker. All the other democrat sex abusers and rapists still stoutly deny their crimes.
Feel free to scroll through the thread and see the err in your fallacious claims.
Prove my claims were "fallacious".
You made the fallacious positive claims.Ever heard of Burden of Proof,or is this your first rodeo?
:Face palm:
We are not talking about whether my claim (be it positive or not) was correct or not. We are arguing about whether you can back up your claim that my claim was "fallacious".
I accept your defeat...class dismissed
So you haven't heard Trump's '***** grabbing tapes?'
Trump and Bill Clinton were good friends at the time. Trump has since gotten away from public displays of wickedness in order to win support from Christian conservatives in the political world. Too bad Hillary was too stupid to do that.
red herring.and HRC clearly continues to live in your head rent free. :thumbs:
I have forgotten all about the fluking floosie. She is your girl. You take care of her.