• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would you die in poverty if Roe v Wade is overturned?

A

Atheist 2020

Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2018
Messages
1,802
Reaction score
290
Location
Tennessee
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Socialist
If you had the choice of dying in poverty if Roe v Wade is overturned?

Please explain your feelings. Thank you.
 
Can I die in wealth if Roe v Wade is upheld?
 
Atheist 2020 said:
If you had the choice of dying in poverty if Roe v Wade is overturned?

Please explain your feelings. Thank you.
Click to expand...

How would a person go about reversing a well known supreme court decision?
 
What's with the basic nonsense? Neither question (and both are different) makes sense.

"Would you die in poverty of RvW were overturned?"
Click to expand...
Why would that decision being overturned affect my financial status?

This one isnt even a complete sentence:

If you had the choice of dying in poverty if Roe v Wade is overturned...this needs an OR <alternative choice.>.
Click to expand...

Please post something coherent in the future.
 
Rogue Valley said:
Think like Brett Kavanaugh thinks ....

Kavanaugh Denies Calling Roe v. Wade Unsettled in 2003 Email
Click to expand...

That won't work since I heard what he told the Senate.

That also ducks my question.

Can you think of a previous supreme court case that was evaded since the one declaring income taxes are not legal?

Congress bypassed it by creating an amendment.

Hint, when Obama was in charge, he or the congress could have put the ruling of Roe V Wade into permanent law. They chose not to.
 
Answer: no
Explanation: I don’t wanna
 
Would this be the result of some sort of protest on your part?
 
It's funny....liberals poke fun at republicrats for their concern over the 2A, and republicrats poke fun at the demopublicans for their concern over roe vs wade.


Meanwhile, gang violence is still out of control in many major cities, poverty is getting worse, the middle class are getting poorer, the gap (chasm) between income levels continues to skyrocket, and the deficit isn't shrinking.
 
Not this **** again... :roll:
 
Atheist 2020 said:
If you had the choice of dying in poverty if Roe v Wade is overturned?

Please explain your feelings. Thank you.
Click to expand...

Why die in poverty when you can just die in the womb at the hand of your "mother?"
 
The possible reversal of Roe v Wade doesn't concern me personally although I firmly believe that all people, yes even women, have a right to choose what they do with their own body and no court of law should have the power to make that decision for her.

The real concern that I have with Kavanaugh is that he has indicated in past decisions that a sitting president should not be indicted and is immune from prosecution. Think about that just for a minute. That would literally dissolve the rule that 'no man is above the law'. It's saying that yes, someone is above the law and can't be prosecuted if they break any law and that's the president. Trump could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and he would be untouchable legally according to Kavanaugh's way of thinking. If Kavanaugh is sitting on the Supreme Court, the highest court in the country, and he's asked to hear argument as to whether Trump can be indicted for collusion, abuse of power or conspiracy, that he would lean towards a decision that would possibly be detrimental to this country.

Going even further, Brian Kavanaugh doesn't feel that a U.S. president should be the subject of an FBI investigation.

See where this is going? It's not only about Roe v Wade that's making people on both sides nervous.
 
That's an interesting question. If want abortion to be made illegal, or highly restricted such as only being allowed if the mother would literally die if an abortion weren't performed in the next 48 hours, what would you be willing to give up in exchange for that happening?
 
KevinKohler said:
It's funny....liberals poke fun at republicrats for their concern over the 2A, and republicrats poke fun at the demopublicans for their concern over roe vs wade.


Meanwhile, gang violence is still out of control in many major cities, poverty is getting worse, the middle class are getting poorer, the gap (chasm) between income levels continues to skyrocket, and the deficit isn't shrinking.
Click to expand...

The more they talk about this, the less time they have to spend manning up and taking positions on important, albeit controversial matters. They hate taking a stand. They would rather duck the real issues entirely.
 
HumblePi said:
The possible reversal of Roe v Wade doesn't concern me personally although I firmly believe that all people, yes even women, have a right to choose what they do with their own body and no court of law should have the power to make that decision for her.

The real concern that I have with Kavanaugh is that he has indicated in past decisions that a sitting president should not be indicted and is immune from prosecution. Think about that just for a minute. That would literally dissolve the rule that 'no man is above the law'. It's saying that yes, someone is above the law and can't be prosecuted if they break any law and that's the president. Trump could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and he would be untouchable legally according to Kavanaugh's way of thinking. If Kavanaugh is sitting on the Supreme Court, the highest court in the country, and he's asked to hear argument as to whether Trump can be indicted for collusion, abuse of power or conspiracy, that he would lean towards a decision that would possibly be detrimental to this country.

Going even further, Brian Kavanaugh doesn't feel that a U.S. president should be the subject of an FBI investigation.

See where this is going? It's not only about Roe v Wade that's making people on both sides nervous.
Click to expand...


First, you left off a part. I put it in red. a sitting president should not be indicted and is immune from prosecution while in office.

Second, Did you feel that way when he made the same statement about Bill Clinton during his impeachment hearings?
 
Ikari said:
Can I die in wealth if Roe v Wade is upheld?
Click to expand...

Can “YOU” conceive, gestate, and give birth in poverty wealth, regardless if Roe v Wade stands are is over turned?
 
holbritter said:
I don't understand the question.
Click to expand...

If you are willing to be in poverty, and dying in poverty and because of that -- you made a deal with the devil -- to die in poverty if Roe v Wade is overturned.
 
Atheist 2020 said:
If you are willing to be in poverty, and dying in poverty and because of that -- you made a deal with the devil -- to die in poverty if Roe v Wade is overturned.
Click to expand...

Ok, let me see if I get it.

Are you asking if I would make a deal with the devil, to live/die in poverty, to make sure Roe v Wade is overturned?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom