• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Abortion and the Second Amendment

The US Constitution...

*A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.*

Nope, not there. Try again
 
*A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.*

Nope, not there. Try again

Sure is... it is an ablative absolute. The Founders were quite adept at Latin.
 
Sure is... it is an ablative absolute. The Founders were quite adept at Latin.

Then you're claiming the "militia" the "people" are interchangable and they're not, they separate entities.
 
Then you're claiming the "militia" the "people" are interchangable and they're not, they separate entities.

I am not... I am saying that the Founders meant that the people that own guns are the militia... because that is what they obviously wrote.
 
Re: Abofrtion and the Second Amendment

I am not... I am saying that the Founders meant that the people that own guns are the militia... because that is what they obviously wrote.

There were a lot of people that owned guns that were not in the militia, so no.
 
Re: Abofrtion and the Second Amendment

There were a lot of people that owned guns that were not in the militia, so no.

Wrong... they were/are all a part of the militia... they just never served due to SCOTUS ****ing up their interpretation...
 
Re: Abofrtion and the Second Amendment

Wrong... they were/are all a part of the militia... they just never served due to SCOTUS ****ing up their interpretation...

When did SCOTUS do this ****ing of their interpretation ??
 
Re: Abofrtion and the Second Amendment

When did SCOTUS do this ****ing of their interpretation ??

When they ruled that gun ownership was individual...
 
Re: Abofrtion and the Second Amendment

I did ask when ??

I don't care about when... I care that this is a bogus argument.
 
Re: Abofrtion and the Second Amendment

I don't care about when... I care that this is a bogus argument.

I agree, your argument is bogus, owning arms didn't automatically enroll one in the militia.

The militia acts of 1792, 1862 and 1903 were specific as to who was in the militia.
 
Re: Abofrtion and the Second Amendment

I agree, your argument is bogus, owning arms didn't automatically enroll one in the militia.

The militia acts of 1792, 1862 and 1903 were specific as to who was in the militia.

Militia Acts can not over turn the Constitution of the United States...
 
Re: Abofrtion and the Second Amendment

Militia Acts can not over turn the Constitution of the United States...

The "militia" and the "people" are separate entities.
 
Re: Abofrtion and the Second Amendment

The "militia" and the "people" are separate entities.

Not when they buy a gun... when the people buy and own a gun they are part of the militia.

It is in the 2nd. It is an ablative absolute. I already stated these facts.
 
Re: Abofrtion and the Second Amendment

Not when they buy a gun... when the people buy and own a gun they are part of the militia.

It is in the 2nd. It is an ablative absolute. I already stated these facts.

No, you've stated your opinion.
 
Re: Abofrtion and the Second Amendment

I started this topic, and it has been hijacked, please close the topic and lock it.
 
Re: Abofrtion and the Second Amendment

No, you've stated your opinion.

Incorrect. I can read and understand how the ablative absolute affects the meaning of the Amendment. Like I said the Founders were educated men and Latin was something that would have been very familiar for them... they incorporated it. No big deal. I am not out to ban guns or anything but those claiming that it is an individual right are incorrect due to ignorance or fear of gun grabbers. Either way I don't care... they are wrong. Just a fact. End of story. :shrug:
 
The abortion debate has nothing to do with the second amendment, more to do with the first, as opposition to abortion rights come primarily as a religious exercise, whereby the religious seek to exercise their imagined authority over women.

I have always said, though, if abortions were performed with some kind of firearm, the right wing would self destruct from the logical contortions required to maintain both the love of oppressing women and the desire for unrestricted gun rights.

As it is now, these hypocrites who describe themselves as pro-life AND pro GUN are already walking a magical, extremely weak intellectual tightrope.
 
If we're going to compare abortion to the Amendments, it's a 13th Amendment issue.
 
If you want a Bernie Sanders utopia of people making $15 an hour. You just pass a law saying any woman making less then $15 an hour you cannot have a baby. America should stop looking at Europe as a utopia ideology. They should look at the positive policies of China, and America should become the next China.

Never gonna happen.China's population is a country in which almost all citizens are Chinese.They are on the same page for the most part.America is a melting pot....a pot in which the ingredients come from all cultures and creeds,and we can't agree on much of anything these days.Then,of course,there is that dictator issue most true American Patriots will never embrace.
 
Back
Top Bottom