The argument that every abortion is justified because the word human and the phrase human being does not appear in the in the u.s. constitution is a flawed one.
YOUR MERE UNSUPPORTED CLAIM IS STILL WORTHLESS WITHOUT EVIDENCE. Evidence of a flaw, that is. Meanwhile, although it is actually a valid argument, it is not the best argument. The best argument notes the Facts that unborn humans
commit
multiple
types of
assault upon their
hostesses, none of which would be tolerable if one adult did it to another adult, and so abortion is, legitimately, self-defense from those assaults.
As i pointed out earlier many countries in the world with legal abortion use specific references to inalienable human rights.
THAT'S THEIR PROBLEM, NOT OURS HERE IN THE USA.
You can call that hypocritical all you want
FACTS ARE FACTS. If they claim human rights are inalienable and also allow abortion of unborn humans, then that is a double-standard and qualifies as hypocrisy. But we don't have that problem here in the USA.
but the fact remains that your argument does not hold up to any sort of global standard.
WHO CARES WHAT IDIOCIES THE REST OF THE WORLD DOES? Over here in the USA we have an intelligent and fair and Fact-based and non-Hypocritical set of rules regarding rights and abortions. Why should we change that to something Stupidly Prejudiced, Stupidly Hypocritical, and otherwise idiotic/nonsensical? Are you going to jump off a cliff just because lots of other folks do?
Another flawed argument that doesn't hold up on a global scale is the argument that the words human, person, and human being are separate and uniquely different things.
IGNORANTLY FALSE. Facts are Facts. It is possible for human entities (like hydatidiform moles) to fail to qualify as persons, and it is possible for non-human entities (like intelligent extraterrestrials) to qualify as persons. Such things would be impossible if "human" always/only equated with "person".
There are several languages in the world that do not recognize this trio as separate words.
WE ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STUPID PREJUDICES OF OTHER HUMAN CULTURES. Remember that the Nazis only considered a small subset of humans to fully qualify as persons. Everyone else was something lesser. All you are doing here is pointing out that other cultures are basically doing the same thing (though perhaps not quite as extreme). How is any of that better than a Universe-wide inclusive definition of "person" (which nevertheless excludes ordinary-animal-class entities)?
Political Correctness is absolutely a form of fascism, and in this day and age the left is far more fascistic then the right.
YOUR EXAMPLES ARE EXTREMIST. I'm quite sure I could find similar extreme examples of right-wing fascism. But the only one that matters here, in the Abortion Forum, is their promotion of enslavement of women who don't want to stay pregnant.
ALSO, MOST OF THOSE EXAMPLES ARE RELATED TO IGNORANCE. They often involve Denying of Objectively Verifiable Facts and the embracing of idiotic unproved nonsensical
claims. So, should someone who is ignorant of cars be allowed to drive one? What would you tell that person when he or she complains about being punished because of ignorance?
I don't know about you, but I read 1984 and it scared the crap out of me, and I don't want to live in a country in which the thought police are a real thing
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. Not ignorance. So start learning the Facts you are currently denying!
