• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Male Opt Out

Status
Not open for further replies.
You said you HATE men


Well see you never really used the word hate but we all know that's what you mean. HAHAHA


You LIED and got busted.

I dont hate men at all and have never even implied that. You are lying now...esp. since I have clearly written that everything I've written on this topic can and should apply to women where possible. Like when men gestate....

Your accusations are nothing more than an attempt to distract and get out of what you've been writing all along.

But you are free to post any of my quotes where I write or even imply I 'hate men.' Be sure to include the blue arrows so we can keep you honest :mrgreen:
 
This post shows a truly stupid conclusion...

You can certainly try and prove that you are right...by continuing to actually argue in the discussion rather than making all your complaining claims to avoid it :mrgreen:
 
I dont hate men at all and have never even implied that. You are lying now...esp. since I have clearly written that everything I've written on this topic can and should apply to women where possible. Like when men gestate....

Your accusations are nothing more than an attempt to distract and get out of what you've been writing all along.

But you are free to post any of my quotes where I write or even imply I 'hate men.' Be sure to include the blue arrows so we can keep you honest :mrgreen:

I get to interpret your posts anyway I want....this is fun!
 
I get to interpret your posts anyway I want....this is fun!

See how she ran from my challenge to her claim that "men" can gestate a baby? :lol:
 
I get to interpret your posts anyway I want....this is fun!

We see you do that all the time. And facts and truth are rarely involved.

Carry on :mrgreen:
 
You can certainly try and prove that you are right...by continuing to actually argue in the discussion rather than making all your complaining claims to avoid it :mrgreen:

Straw Man...
 
I answered it. Directly.

What more did you want?

Directly answered the post... not the gestate aspect of it... I DO like this game!
 
Straw Man...

Aaannnd we're back to you complaining "straw man!", "lying!", "that's not what that means!":roll:

You could easily attempt to argue the different aspects of the discussion but you wont because you cant. So you refuse to admit any other aspects are relevant. "That's not part of it!. It's not about <fill in the blank>."

Try it with post 3108 where I directly and specifically answered you...and you dropped it like a hot potato :mrgreen:
 
Directly answered the post... not the gestate aspect of it... I DO like this game!

Are you making some distinction (that the law does not) regarding transgender men and biologically assigned men?

Are you claiming that I view trans men as still female?
 
You are posting. LOL

That's not you proving anything.

You fail again. :mrgreen:

I notice that both you and the OP have completely given up the discussion, resorting to this diversionary silliness.

Opt out---a poorly conceived, selfish failed social proposal.

Post 3108 is a good way to wrap it up....it highlights why the Opt Out is a giant fail.
 
That's not you proving anything.

You fail again. :mrgreen:

I notice that both you and the OP have completely given up the discussion, resorting to this diversionary silliness.

Opt out---a poorly conceived, selfish failed social proposal.

Post 3108 is a good way to wrap it up....it highlights why the Opt Out is a giant fail.

You are lying again
 
You are lying again

Which statement? Be specific, unless all you have left is more vegassing.

And we all know what that means: vegassing=no discussion.
 
Which statement? Be specific, unless all you have left is more vegassing.

And we all know what that means: vegassing=no discussion.

Huh?.....
 
Are you making some distinction (that the law does not) regarding transgender men and biologically assigned men?

Are you claiming that I view trans men as still female?

Are you claiming that a biological male has a uterus and womb and etc and can give birth to a baby? :lol:
 
Are you claiming that a biological male has a uterus and womb and etc and can give birth to a baby? :lol:

No. Why is that relevant to this discussion if the man...bio or transgender...carries a fetus? His bodily sovereignty may not be overcome by law, anymore than a pregnant woman's. And the egg donor would have NO opt out if she decided to end the relationship. She'd still be liable for child support. Or joint custody one hopes, in all such situations.

And men are gestating today.
 
Truth is never relevant to the discussion with her

I notice that you & the OP are discussing me and not the topic.

Are you done with the discussion? Since neither of you never managed to refute my factual arguments...perhaps you should consider it.

Or resume the discussion, per forum rules.
 
I notice that you & the OP are discussing me and not the topic.

Are you done with the discussion? Since neither of you never managed to refute my factual arguments...perhaps you should consider it.

Or resume the discussion, per forum rules.

Men deserve a opt out post conception. That is civil rights. That is pro choice.


There. Lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom