Firstly, I’m not denying that inequalities exists. I’m not appealing to authority. I want to see someone to come up with a legitimate solution that is congruent to our form of government and constitutional construct.
I’m not “your problem or adversary”. But I can’t turn a blind eye to the challenges that will have to be overcome to satisfy all parties involved. When I see bull**** ranting that won’t move this issue toward an equitable solution then I’m going to “opine” what I see as a dead-end solution.
For instance...
There will never be a law that requires doctors to report to some authority that a woman has sought to be tested for pregnancy that it has been determined positive. And that an agent of some authority will determine the fate of the pregnancy.
So, how about the following:
“No medical abortion can be legally performed on a woman who has been verified by a medical provider without said woman disclosing the name of the man whose sperm fertilized the women’s ovum.” The man will be required to be notified and he will make a legal declaration as to whether or not he will opt out of any financial and any future relationship with a child that might be born.
Do you believe that something similar would get past the S.C.?
If that fails then what law could be passed in Congress and the S.C. accepts as Constitutional?
From strictly legal avenues, I opine that one of two things has to happen. An Amendment that suspends women’s current rights the moment a woman becomes pregnant or Congress has to create legislation that allow men to opt out and are decided to be Constitutional.
What is the prevailing law(s) in New Zeland that determines the potential outcomes in these types of dilemmas?
It’s my contention that the solution isn’t going to happen from new laws, high court decision, or Constitutional Amendments.
