If you claim that pro-life centres are lying, then I can also say that pro-abortion centres are lying, too.
BUT CAN YOU SUPPORT YOUR CLAIM WITH EVIDENCE? The evidence supporting my claim is very clear --the more humans,
the less other
life there can be on this planet. Anyone claiming to be pro LIFE should be promoting all types of life, not just human life --especially when we know humans
cannot survive without
other life, and can't even reach maximum psychological health without
other life.
You are very biased and you don't even know it.
BRAGGING ABOUT YOURSELF, I SEE. Tsk, tsk! Me, I
earned my bias, across years of studying and demolishing idiotic anti-abortion arguments.
Here's the list (which I wrote). It is extremely clear that abortion opponents are either poorly educated or Stupidly Prejudiced or brainwashed-from-birth or gullible fools believing what they've been told without question --possibly more than one of those things. Little else can explain the pure idiocy of most of their anti-abortion arguments (without them also being pure idiots, of course).
Also, I think it's very telling that you put sneer quotes around the term pro-life.
THAT'S BECAUSE THEY PROPAGANDISTICALLY WANT IT TO MEAN SOMETHING OTHER THAN WHAT IT LITERALLY SAYS. Literally, the phrase "pro life" puts no restrictions on the kinds of life being promoted/favored. Practically, abortion opponents act like it means "pro human life only, and all other life can
die as far as they are concerned". Which is exactly why the usage of that phrase by abortion opponents counts as Propaganda. They want others to think they represent a higher ethic than they actually represent.
You have already made up your mind that pro-lifers are bad/evil etc.
MANY OF THEM ARE SIMPLY IGNORANT (see "poorly educated" above). If adequately educated, I expect a significant number of them would become pro-choicers. Others know the Facts already and don't care, because of their Stupid Prejudice, or their control-freak issues --how are they
not evil, wanting to enslave pregnant women who don't want to stay pregnant?
Or maybe the reason they don't mention non-human life is not because they don't care, but rather, it's because it is not the topic which they wish to address.
DOESN'T MATTER. All they need do is openly expose their Stupid Prejudice and say they are pro human life. Why hide it with a less-accurate description? (Oh, that's right, evil doesn't like to be exposed!)
Being pro-life and being pro-animal (which is what I think you mean) are not mutually exclusive.
MORE SO THAN YOU MIGHT THINK. The total biomass in the world is relatively constant. Biomass includes all types of organic matter associated with life, including corpses and excrement. Sometimes some of it is sequestered (oil deposits, coal seams), and sometimes it re-enters the biosphere (humans have been de-sequestering coal and oil for quite a few decades). But overall, long term, the total biomass on the planet is relatively constant. And that means we have a
Zero Sum Game regarding different types of life. The more human life in the world,
the less other life there can be. Plain and simple.
