• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Christian Abortion Hypocrisy [W: 439]

FutureIncoming said:
HAW! HAW!! HAW!!! That from the side of the Overall Abortion Debate that thinks making people starve is a sign of their own competence. Tsk, tsk!
Click to expand...

You know, women would have more money if they didn't spend so much money on frivolous things like makeup and designer clothes. As a man, my needs are simple - food, clothes, soap, shampoo, the basics.

Most women I know can barely balance a budget because they spend on things like makeup, designer clothes, expensive shampoo, shoes, candles, etc.. In general I believe men are able to stretch a dollar further, therefore are not starving. When a woman can't pay for groceries yet is wearing a cashmere scarf, I just shake my head in disgust.
 
Bucky said:
You know, women would have more money if they didn't spend so much money on frivolous things like makeup and designer clothes. As a man, my needs are simple - food, clothes, soap, shampoo, the basics.

Most women I know can barely balance a budget because they spend on things like makeup, designer clothes, expensive shampoo, shoes, candles, etc.. In general I believe men are able to stretch a dollar further, therefore are not starving. When a woman can't pay for groceries yet is wearing a cashmere scarf, I just shake my head in disgust.
Click to expand...

You know, men would have more money if they didnt spend it on 4-wheelers and sports equipment and beer :roll:

Most men I know live in pig styes and eat Fritos because they cant cook or clean. :doh

Bucky, I hear 1624 calling your name :doh You are exceedingly out of touch with reality.

All the head shaking in disgust is directed at you.
 
Bucky said:
You know, women would have more money if they didn't spend so much money on frivolous things like makeup and designer clothes. As a man, my needs are simple - food, clothes, soap, shampoo, the basics.

Most women I know can barely balance a budget because they spend on things like makeup, designer clothes, expensive shampoo, shoes, candles, etc.. In general I believe men are able to stretch a dollar further, therefore are not starving. When a woman can't pay for groceries yet is wearing a cashmere scarf, I just shake my head in disgust.
Click to expand...

Most women I know with families are great at stretching a dollar. Men in my family have gone out to get school clothes. COme back with 2 sets for 2 kids for $100. A woman in charge of the budget goes to Kohls with the 30% off coupon on sale day when they are also offering bonus bucks $10 for every $50 spent and comes back with 4 sets of school clothes and 2 prs sneakers and 2 prs school shoes for the same amount. She them comes back 5 days later with her $20 dollars in Kohls bonus bucks and a 15% coupon and gets 4 six packs of socks. I double down on this and buy at Kohls online - I go through Ebates first (3 to 15%cash back every 3 or 4 months), then to Kohls, get exactly what I want and free shipping to boot. My son is 6'4" with a size 14 foot, so it makes sense anyway.

I asked my male family members who frequent safeway if they are signed up for the "club". Had no clue...even though they shop there the most. They were clueless that by just entering their phone number that they could get stuff they buy the most for extremely reduced prices. My son is educated on this though.:lamo44 . Now they all do it and our gas rewards accrue quickly.

BTW, what woman in her right mind would allow you to look at her checkbook to make the judgement whether or not they are handling their finances well?:lamo
 
Last edited:
Lursa said:
You know, men would have more money if they didnt spend it on 4-wheelers and sports equipment and beer :roll:

Most men I know live in pig styes and eat Fritos because they cant cook or clean. :doh

Bucky, I hear 1624 calling your name :doh You are exceedingly out of touch with reality.

All the head shaking in disgust is directed at you.
Click to expand...

That's disgustingly sexist and clearly telegraphs your intent to oppress men.
 
Lursa said:
You know, men would have more money if they didnt spend it on 4-wheelers and sports equipment and beer :roll:

Most men I know live in pig styes and eat Fritos because they cant cook or clean. :doh

Bucky, I hear 1624 calling your name :doh You are exceedingly out of touch with reality.

All the head shaking in disgust is directed at you.
Click to expand...

Bucky said:
You know, women would have more money if they didn't spend so much money on frivolous things like makeup and designer clothes. As a man, my needs are simple - food, clothes, soap, shampoo, the basics.

Most women I know can barely balance a budget because they spend on things like makeup, designer clothes, expensive shampoo, shoes, candles, etc.. In general I believe men are able to stretch a dollar further, therefore are not starving. When a woman can't pay for groceries yet is wearing a cashmere scarf, I just shake my head in disgust.
Click to expand...

Celebrity said:
That's disgustingly sexist and clearly telegraphs your intent to oppress men.
Click to expand...

I don't know....it was a perfect response to Bucky's post.

I have no clue what 1624 means. Is that like a 51-50?
 
year2late said:
I don't know....it was a perfect response to Bucky's post.

I have no clue what 1624 means. Is that like a 51-50?
Click to expand...

Ah, ok. So just to be clear, is it ok to be sexist as long as it's the perfect response?

Or should I just tally this on the list of times you thought sexism against men was justified where sexism against women wasn't, because women deserve preferential treatment?

My point, year2late, is that you may be a cynic, but your cynicism does not justify derogatory comments about other people or abuses of groups of people.
 
Last edited:
Bucky said:
When a woman can't pay for groceries yet is wearing a cashmere scarf, I just shake my head in disgust.
Click to expand...
YOU DON'T KNOW WHEN SHE ACQUIRED IT. Perhaps she bought it when she had cash to spare. I've encountered some women who despise men because the men did such things as cause the women to lose good jobs. You can be sure those women are not going to feel better about men who do things like this and this!
 
year2late said:
I don't know....it was a perfect response to Bucky's post.

I have no clue what 1624 means. Is that like a 51-50?
Click to expand...

It's the year! ha ha!
 
Celebrity said:
Ah, ok. So just to be clear, is it ok to be sexist as long as it's the perfect response?

Or should I just tally this on the list of times you thought sexism against men was justified where sexism against women wasn't, because women deserve preferential treatment?

My point, year2late, is that you may be a cynic, but your cynicism does not justify derogatory comments about other people or abuses of groups of people.
Click to expand...

It wasnt serious...it was a sarcastic response mirroring his to show him how preposterously sexist his was. :roll:
 
Lursa said:
It wasnt serious...it was a sarcastic response mirroring his to show him how preposterously sexist his was. :roll:
Click to expand...

Well that's funny, I didn't think you understood sarcasm.
 
Celebrity said:
Ah, ok. So just to be clear, is it ok to be sexist as long as it's the perfect response?

Or should I just tally this on the list of times you thought sexism against men was justified where sexism against women wasn't, because women deserve preferential treatment?

My point, year2late is that you may be a cynic, but your cynicism does not justify derogatory comments about other people or abuses of groups of people.
Click to expand...

I can only speak to my experience.

I have heard twice today already about self indulgent moms squandering the man's hard earned bucks. With rare exception, most moms I know with kids are working moms. They get that type of response occasionally, and are quick to show receipts . The moms I know network to try to get barely used school uniforms for the kids. They work coupons and keep their eyes out for future sales. Like I said before....most women I know go to Kohls during a sale with a 30 percent coupon and $10 bonus bucks per $50 spent. Then they buy ahead - and they keep receipts just incase the kid bypasses a size. For their effort, they get looked down upon by their ex-s when they get a new hairstyle and new outfits for work.

But this fight is silly to me because the real "fix" for guys is to improve their reproductive control by improve male contraception - make it nearly 100% effective, idiot proof (like implantables for women), safe and effective and cheap. I do not want men to have to be responsible for the children they do not want. That is the key, not refusing responsibility if a child is born.

I believe to a near certainty that before any 'opt out' becomes a thing....male contraception will have improved so much that this is no longer a huge issue.
 
Lursa said:
You know, men would have more money if they didnt spend it on 4-wheelers and sports equipment and beer :roll:

Most men I know live in pig styes and eat Fritos because they cant cook or clean. :doh

Bucky, I hear 1624 calling your name :doh You are exceedingly out of touch with reality.

All the head shaking in disgust is directed at you.
Click to expand...

Jeez, you can't take a joke or understand sarcasm. Ligthen up.
 
Bucky said:
You know, women would have more money if they didn't spend so much money on frivolous things like makeup and designer clothes. As a man, my needs are simple - food, clothes, soap, shampoo, the basics.

Most women I know can barely balance a budget because they spend on things like makeup, designer clothes, expensive shampoo, shoes, candles, etc.. In general I believe men are able to stretch a dollar further, therefore are not starving. When a woman can't pay for groceries yet is wearing a cashmere scarf, I just shake my head in disgust.
Click to expand...

Bucky said:
Jeez, you can't take a joke or understand sarcasm. Ligthen up.
Click to expand...

I do not for a second believe the first post was meant in a sarcastic way. It is completely in line with the misogynistic crap you have been posting otherwise.
 
year2late said:
I do not for a second believe the first post was meant in a sarcastic way. It is completely in line with the misogynistic crap you have been posting otherwise.
Click to expand...

I am a very non-serious person. You can't take my posts seriously most of the time.
 
Bucky said:
I am a very non-serious person. You can't take my posts seriously most of the time.
Click to expand...

Is this how you are attempting to get out of getting caught in all the lies?

Only the very naive are buying that.��
 
Re: Christian Abortion Hypocrisy

calamity said:
Simply put: there is more to being pro-life than just being anti-abortion. No one, and I mean no one, who supports Donald Trump can legitimately claim to be pro-life or pro-Jesus. Those are simply not compatible.
Click to expand...

many believe jesus was libertarian ,god didnt give everybody mind ,too bad :2razz:
 
year2late said:
But this fight is silly to me because the real "fix" for guys is to improve their reproductive control by improve male contraception - make it nearly 100% effective, idiot proof (like implantables for women), safe and effective and cheap. I do not want men to have to be responsible for the children they do not want. That is the key, not refusing responsibility if a child is born.
Click to expand...

Was the fight for abortion silly for women? Should women have access to a method which allows them to disavow parentage after a pregnancy has occurred? If so, men should also have the right to some method, i.e. to opt out of parentage as women commonly do by abortion and adoption.

Some of your language is suggestive of your motive. You think that guys want to "improve their reproductive control." Unfortunately, this is not what guys need from you or anyone else. However, I think it is clear that you want to control men via reproduction by denying them the autonomy they deserve. Women have a choice. You do not want men to have a choice because you are a controlling person. I am ashamed for you that you are so insecure that you feel the need to impose on men and boys in this way. I sincerely hope that any measure of influence over any man or boy over which you maintain an illusion of grandeur is rapidly diminished and extinguished.
 
Lursa said:
Cool, you have an excellent record of being wrong.
Click to expand...

And you have an excellent record of believing that you can turn a sexist statement into a non-sexist statement by reversing the roles in the statement.

Not cool, Lursa, and very wrong of you. I'd go so far as to say it's not very excellent of you. I'm confused as to how you came to that conclusion if you are such a good judge of being incorrect, having been proven wrong by me many times in the past, due to your fallacious, hypocritical claims.
 
Celebrity said:
Was the fight for abortion silly for women? Should women have access to a method which allows them to disavow parentage after a pregnancy has occurred? If so, men should also have the right to some method, i.e. to opt out of parentage as women commonly do by abortion and adoption.

Some of your language is suggestive of your motive. You think that guys want to "improve their reproductive control." Unfortunately, this is not what guys need from you or anyone else. However, I think it is clear that you want to control men via reproduction by denying them the autonomy they deserve. Women have a choice. You do not want men to have a choice because you are a controlling person. I am ashamed for you that you are so insecure that you feel the need to impose on men and boys in this way. I sincerely hope that any measure of influence over any man or boy over which you maintain an illusion of grandeur is rapidly diminished and extinguished.
Click to expand...

Not controlling in the least. Making suggestions since this opt out thing will never go anywhere. But keep up the good fight.
 
year2late said:
Not controlling in the least. Making suggestions since this opt out thing will never go anywhere. But keep up the good fight.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
Celebrity said:
And you have an excellent record of believing that you can turn a sexist statement into a non-sexist statement by reversing the roles in the statement.

Not cool, Lursa, and very wrong of you. I'd go so far as to say it's not very excellent of you. I'm confused as to how you came to that conclusion if you are such a good judge of being incorrect, having been proven wrong by me many times in the past, due to your fallacious, hypocritical claims.
Click to expand...

I'm not remotely sexist. I have posted time and again that if and when men become pregnant...I support all the exact same laws for them...and men are indeed getting pregnant now.

And as for laws pertaining to kids AFTER they're born, I support those laws to be equal as well.

So tack this to your fridge and remember it the next time you think I'm being sexist. Cuz I'll just call you out on being wrong...again.
 
Lursa said:
I'm not remotely sexist. I have posted time and again that if and when men become pregnant...I support all the exact same laws for them...and men are indeed getting pregnant now.

And as for laws pertaining to kids AFTER they're born, I support those laws to be equal as well.

So tack this to your fridge and remember it the next time you think I'm being sexist. Cuz I'll just call you out on being wrong...again.
Click to expand...

Again: You are very sexist. Go ahead and tack this to your fridge and remember it the next time you think about calling me out on being wrong. You will fail, again.

You are sexist because you do not support equal treatment of men. You very clearly support the incarceration and abuse of men by the criminal justice system.

Unfortunately, you appear to be blinded by your privilege. Maybe you should check your privilege.

You are sexist because you think that women should be able to choose to be parents, while men should be forced to be parents whether they like it or not. And this is the cause of severe economic depression which affects communities where men live in poverty. It's too bad you cannot take this issue seriously because you do not respect men.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom