• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Some women are a thundeing mass of conflicting impulses.

Best to expose the trumpybear trio of bannon the nullificator, moore the molester, and trump the her asser ...

Didn't vote for Trump, he's better then Clinton, but far from my first pick. Keep guessing, your getting warmer, and no I've never been on this board before, so I'll do you this favor so you can stop mixing your mind up thinking about who I might be.
 
Its not about being well behaved. Its about treating women as equals and being a grown up.

If equality was the goal you would not need "being a grown up", which is of course code for "men well never cause women any disturbance, men will stay in their place, behind women".

I refuse.
 
You left out Clinton, Matty boy from NBC and the fat guy that got the ball rolling.

I pointed out to you that I have my own insurance so no worries pal. Your too clueless to argue with, maybe I can find a block for you. Yes a hobby, sex is to have children, if your having it and don't want kids it's a hobby or done for fun. Please learn from books.

I may have joined 9 days ago, what does that mean, I haven't known people for 50+ years, I only started becoming enlighten in the past 9 days? OMG so arrogant. Your so easy it's taking the fun out of it. Bye for now, you'll have to wait until tomorrow for me to cut you up some more. Left coast, LMAO, that's funny!

You are so insecure, so terrified of women...

Sex is one of those natural urges that your god created. I have sex because I love my significant other, we don't do it for having kids...and at our age, its a nice thing. It seems that you are pretty clueless about realizing that you should respect and treat women as equals and not make such misogynist and idiotic statements.
 
Men were more than willing to see the point of the complaints of women after ww2 all the way up to the Nineties, men have nothing to be ashamed of, it is the women who are the problem, have been the problem since they decided mid 90's that equality is not good enough, men must be control to keep us tamed....controlled by women NATCH.

Really. Men have been more than willing? I will agree that women have not always made it easier to navigate the waters. But one, they were playing the game the way men taught them to play it. And most men have not willingly given up squat and still consider women less than equal in almost everything. I have been in the executive/director arena for years and even in California, women still face the same old crap. Chip on the shoulder? Yes, and I don't blame them.
 
You are so insecure, so terrified of women...

Hahahahha

Yeah, we do. What the hell do you think SS is?
I don't get SS, nor will I. But even if I did I'd have put into it so I'd be welcome to draw from it.

I was going to tell you what retirement plan I had but I'll see how bad you want to learn something.
 
Really. Men have been more than willing? I will agree that women have not always made it easier to navigate the waters. But one, they were playing the game the way men taught them to play it. And most men have not willingly given up squat and still consider women less than equal in almost everything. I have been in the executive/director arena for years and even in California, women still face the same old crap. Chip on the shoulder? Yes, and I don't blame them.

So we disagree. I am not shocked to learn this.
 
If equality was the goal you would not need "being a grown up", which is of course code for "men well never cause women any disturbance, men will stay in their place, behind women".

I refuse.

....coming from you....

seriously...
 
How will you stop women from doing this?

And if she cant support the child on her own, what do you suggest?

At the very least that a wedding take place with the responsible father, the American taxpayer who may at their own volition apply for divorce.

U.S. Taxpayers Save $7 For Every Dollar The Government Spends On Family*Planning – ThinkProgress[/url]

So why would you object to free or subsidized birth control?

By asking how much we save by not funding these highly flawed "studies"
 
Hahahahha


I don't get SS, nor will I. But even if I did I'd have put into it so I'd be welcome to draw from it.

I was going to tell you what retirement plan I had but I'll see how bad you want to learn something.

It seems that the only people that regularly complain about other people having sex are those people who don't ever have sex.
 
Arrogant is demeaning women because of their sex, demeaning Americans because they are liberals, and demeaning Americans because of where they live.

The GOParty of trump, bannon and moore will give us losers like Ward in AZ and Tarkanian in NV to mop up in the general next year, lefty louie ...

You left out Clinton, Matty boy from NBC and the fat guy that got the ball rolling.

I pointed out to you that I have my own insurance so no worries pal. Your too clueless to argue with, maybe I can find a block for you. Yes a hobby, sex is to have children, if your having it and don't want kids it's a hobby or done for fun. Please learn from books.

I may have joined 9 days ago, what does that mean, I haven't known people for 50+ years, I only started becoming enlighten in the past 9 days? OMG so arrogant. Your so easy it's taking the fun out of it. Bye for now, you'll have to wait until tomorrow for me to cut you up some more. Left coast, LMAO, that's funny!
 
At the very least that a wedding take place with the responsible father, the American taxpayer who may at their own volition apply for divorce.



By asking how much we save by not funding these highly flawed "studies"

Got a better study? Post it
 
Arrogant is demeaning women because of their sex, demeaning Americans because they are liberals, and demeaning Americans because of where they live.

The GOParty of trump, bannon and moore will give us losers like Ward in AZ and Tarkanian in NV to mop up in the general next year, lefty louie ...

Trust me, Ward has no chance of winning in AZ, first she has to beat an equally idiotic primary challenger in McSally, then she would have to beat a very strong and classy Sinema who has done a great job as a US congresswoman.
 
Arrogant is demeaning women because of their sex, demeaning Americans because they are liberals, and demeaning Americans because of where they live.

The GOParty of trump, bannon and moore will give us losers like Ward in AZ and Tarkanian in NV to mop up in the general next year, lefty louie ...

But ruining men, the life's work of men, upon the completely unsupported claims of a few women is JUST FINE AND DANDY!

Often for no more reason than a woman claims that her feelings were hurt by a man, maybe decades ago.

Go ahead, tell me that this state of affairs represents justice.
 
Trust me, Ward has no chance of winning in AZ, first she has to beat an equally idiotic primary challenger in McSally, then she would have to beat a very strong and classy Sinema who has done a great job as a US congresswoman.

Only if voters in your CDs 03 and 07 choose to turn out, DEM CDs that historically come in well over 150,000 votes less than your other 7 CDs, easily enough to have given AZ to Clinton.

Since I first voted against Nixon in 1972, the one thing that stands out the most from the beginning of the GOP culture war is their ability to drive up opponent's negatives and drive down voter turnout.

DEMs will repeat their down-ballot election impotence beginning with REDMAP 2010 if they underestimate the GOP smear machine.

The so-called GOP civil war hasn't prevented them from taking over this Nation and deeply embedding their state and federal remaps ...
 
Only if voters in your CDs 03 and 07 choose to turn out, DEM CDs that historically come in well over 150,000 votes less than your other 7 CDs, easily enough to have given AZ to Clinton.

Since I first voted against Nixon in 1972, the one thing that stands out the most from the beginning of the GOP culture war is their ability to drive up opponent's negatives and drive down voter turnout.

DEMs will repeat their down-ballot election impotence beginning with REDMAP 2010 if they underestimate the GOP smear machine.

The so-called GOP civil war hasn't prevented them from taking over this Nation and deeply embedding their state and federal remaps ...

Sinema is strong, and she has the veteran vote and the hispanic vote, she is not to be underestimated.
 
Hahahahha


I don't get SS, nor will I. But even if I did I'd have put into it so I'd be welcome to draw from it.

I was going to tell you what retirement plan I had but I'll see how bad you want to learn something.

Yeah, we ALL put into it. So do women who get financial assistance for whatever reason, and thus they are just as welcome to it. And other women put into it, but never use it.

It's still there if we need it, just like SS and Medicare are there if you screw up your body through your own choices (or just have bad luck, or just need routine maintenance -- that's a thing too) and then for whatever reason can't afford the care.

So stop whining, just because you don't think women should have the same social support you have,

Also, why the hell would I care what retirement plan you have? Seriously, there is nothing I'd be less interested in knowing about some rando on the internet.
 
Sinema is strong, and she has the veteran vote and the hispanic vote, she is not to be underestimated.

And now you'll have a special election in CD--08 Franks, who beat Green Party candidate Salazar by more than 2-to-1 last year. Along with nationwide focus on your CDs 01 and 02. With Kirkpatrick waiting on deck.

The 5-corner province as I like to call it, including NV, has big potential problems in NV for DEMs, with the seats of Kihuen and Rosen up for grabs. I don't see Rosen as a clear-cut winner either against Sen. Heller, if he clears the primary.

NV's term-limited GOP Gov. Sandoval is very popular, like all 5 of the GOP governors in the Northeast Province that will be easily reelected, with governor gains in CT and RI possible. I see a Baker/Sandoval POTUS ticket in 2020 as unbeatable.

Looks like Speaker Ryan doesn't want to be the 3rd Speaker ever to lose his seat in an election. trump won Ryan's CD by 10+ %; Romney/Ryan won it by 4%.

MN has 4 DEM CDs in trouble, where Clinton only won by 44,000. DEM Gov. Dayton is term limited and GOPs have both state chambers. And now DEMs have two Senate elections in MN next year ...
 
And now you'll have a special election in CD--08 Franks, who beat Green Party candidate Salazar by more than 2-to-1 last year. Along with nationwide focus on your CDs 01 and 02. With Kirkpatrick waiting on deck.

The 5-corner province as I like to call it, including NV, has big potential problems in NV for DEMs, with the seats of Kihuen and Rosen up for grabs. I don't see Rosen as a clear-cut winner either against Sen. Heller, if he clears the primary.

NV's term-limited GOP Gov. Sandoval is very popular, like all 5 of the GOP governors in the Northeast Province that will be easily reelected, with governor gains in CT and RI possible. I see a Baker/Sandoval POTUS ticket in 2020 as unbeatable.

Looks like Speaker Ryan doesn't want to be the 3rd Speaker ever to lose his seat in an election. trump won Ryan's CD by 10+ %; Romney/Ryan won it by 4%.

MN has 4 DEM CDs in trouble, where Clinton only won by 44,000. DEM Gov. Dayton is term limited and GOPs have both state chambers. And now DEMs have two Senate elections in MN next year ...

Franks district is all wingnut uneducated white trash, no dem can win there.
 
For the same reason there is so little interest in developing male birth control....because the feminists are in charge, and they are always looking to deprive men of power.

You are kidding, right?:lamo
 
Franks district is all wingnut uneducated white trash, no dem can win there.

The green papers are showing that primary on 02/27 and the election on 04/24. Close the gaps nationwide next year in Red CDs and flip them in 2020 ...
 
For the same reason there is so little interest in developing male birth control....because the feminists are in charge, and they are always looking to deprive men of power.

In charge of what and who are they?
 
At the very least that a wedding take place with the responsible father, the American taxpayer who may at their own volition apply for divorce.
So your suggestion is that we force people to get married? Is that something that is legally feasible? If so, please explain the legal justification.


By asking how much we save by not funding these highly flawed "studies"

I'm happy to entertain your sources providing the flaws in the study I posted. Let's see credible references to support your claim.
 
Back
Top Bottom