• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans prove they are not pro life...

I am personally pro choice. I believe in choice.

Choice to get pregnant
Choice to have sex
Choice to take off your clothes

Choice is important for every democratic society, however the right of choice ends when it interferes with another's right to life.

And I believe it he choice of women to totally ignore your views as to what you think choices should be.

I believe in a woman's right to think and make choices for themselves and totally ignore what other people think of those choices.

The right to choice is important for women and that right is absolute in the first stages of the pregnancy.
 
And I believe it he choice of women to totally ignore your views as to what you think choices should be.

I believe in a woman's right to think and make choices for themselves and totally ignore what other people think of those choices.

The right to choice is important for women and that right is absolute in the first stages of the pregnancy.

This is a hyperbolic view of human rights. Humans do not deserve the right to play god. It is not our destiny to become our children's executioner.
 
This is a hyperbolic view of human rights.
A STUPID LIE. Simply because you are talking about "human rights" as if they are more important than "person rights". How many times have I told you that a hydatidiform mole is a 100% human and 100% alive entity, that not even the most vehement abortion opponent would insist deserves rights? It is not our human-ness that makes us special!!! It is our person-ness --which no unborn human possesses to the slightest degree.

Humans do not deserve the right to play god.
ANOTHER STUPID LIE. Especially in the Overall Abortion Debate. Because abortion is about offspring, and one of the Standard Claims of abortion opponents is that humans are offspring of god. Do you or don't you know what offspring might eventually grow up to become?

It is not our destiny to become our children's executioner.
YET ANOTHER STUPID LIE. Because, as I've pointed out to you numerous times before, unborn humans are very different from "children". YOU are more similar to an ordinary child than is any unborn human!
 
This is a hyperbolic view of human rights. Humans do not deserve the right to play god. It is not our destiny to become our children's executioner.

First, no children are being executed, but nice pro-life fake word use there by putting all kinds of nonsense words together to make it like women are executing children through abortion. Which is of course BS bull, nonsense, total fantasy, incorrect ramblings, etc. etc. etc.

Second, no it is a view on actual human rights, it is the right to self determination, the right to be master of ones own body.

Third, if you want to believe in gods or base your life on that, fine, that too is a human right. Except just because you think this way does not mean others should think that way or give a flying fig about your views with regards to what humans deserve and do not deserve to decide.
 
This is a hyperbolic view of human rights. Humans do not deserve the right to play god. It is not our destiny to become our children's executioner.

People dont necessarily believe in God and by law, are not bound to obey yours.

This is what concerns people about very religious, blindly religious people: that they willingly buy into things based on myth and fantasy, not fact.

Facts: there are no children or executions or human rights for the unborn involved in abortion.
 
Thank you Republicans for dropping the charade with your tax bill. We can see your true colors now. Abolishing the adoption tax credit? Really? The National Review said it best...



Adoption Tax Credit: A Pro-Life Policy Republicans Must Save | National Review

But what is important here is you could build one air craft carrier with the revenue that eliminating this credit will generate for the Feds in 10 years. Tens of thousands of vulnerable children may now be priced out of a forever family because Republicans think the estate tax is such an unethical financial burden on families worth nearly $6 million. Priorities, right?

I have talked to a lot of pro lifers on this site. The majority of them don't support a culture of life, and support policies that are unproductive in making abortion less likely to occur.
 
This is a hyperbolic view of human rights. Humans do not deserve the right to play god. It is not our destiny to become our children's executioner.

Whose god and it's been against the law for eons to execute children (as defined by law).

Well, there's probably a couple of exceptions in US history. For example:

On June 14, 1915, 13-year-old Joe Persons of Butts County, Georgia, raped and murdered an eight-year-old girl whose name had been withheld from the papers.

The crime was reported as being so heinous that the young boy’s father even petitioned for his son to hang.

In accordance with legal procedure at Jackson, Persons was led from his cell to the prison courtyard where the gallows awaited. Newspaper archives dated September 26, 1915, stated that the “immature and underdeveloped” Persons weighed only 29 kilograms (65 lb) and that local officials debated adding weights to his body to ensure a successful execution.The events that followed are unclear other than the fact that Persons paid with his life that ominous fall day.

Now I doubt a 13 year old would be executed today for a heinous crime.

Oh, at what age are the children being executed...according to "you"?
 
Back
Top Bottom