OBVIOUSLY, THERE ISN'T ANY. At least about things called "godly" or "ungodly". It might be possible to point to other evidence associated with God's existence, but none of that has anything to do with human claims about "godly" or "ungodly". Not even the most devout religionist claims God literally sat down somewhere and wrote the Bible. Humans wrote it, and it is well-known that humans are capable of lying for their own benefit. They even bragged about it in Deuteronomy 17:9-12 --the Bible exists to support the socio-political power of those who wrote it.
WE DON'T SEE IT BECAUSE IT IS EXTREMELY DIFFERENT. Human life is not what makes us superior to other life-forms on Earth. Human life has absolutely nothing to do with personhood, and it is persons that you are talking about when you say "taking away the life of you, me, and any other person outside the womb". You even KNOW what a person truly is, and can prove it to yourself by Answering this simple Question: "If you were visiting a modern well-equipped medical laboratory, and some madman with a machete cut your head off in an attempt to murder you, but rescuers arrived in time, would you want them to save your headless human body, or your severed head, to save YOU-THE-PERSON?" (And we most certainly do have the medical technology to save your choice, else "head transplants" would not have been in the news recently.)
Adolf Hitler would be so proud of you right now. How dare you call the most innocent among us parasites. There is no greater gift this side of heaven than a new person conceived.
FALSE. Hitler was an abortion opponent, and therefore expressed the same idiocy as all the other abortion opponents out there.
I MOST CERTAINLY DARE WHEN IT IS OBJECTIVELY MEASURABLE TRUTH. Unborn humans are 100% guilty of performing actions very equivalent to those of parasites. And worse. If an adult human did any one of those things that I linked, he or she could be arrested and successfully prosecuted for assault. But there is no way to stop the assaults of an unborn human RIGHT NOW (equivalent to "arrest") without killing it.
FOUR STUPID LIES. Overpopulation is a curse, not a gift, and only idiots dare promote making it worse. Second, persons are not conceived, they are made, and that statement can be totally proved true --see the link in my message that you quoted. Third, heaven has nothing to do with human reproductive biology in almost all cases (only three claimed exceptions in Biblical history); only idiot religionists would claim that their perfect God is responsible for the horrible genetic defects that cause about 1/6 of all confirmed pregnancies to miscarry. And fourth, it is totally impossible for unborn humans to qualify as persons. Just answer the question in red text that you quoted from my other message, and see for yourself.
NECESSARY EDIT: I SPECIFICALLY DID NOT DO THAT. I called the unborn "unwanted mindless parasitic animals", which is technically different from "parasites". The word "parasitic" describes actions, and there is absolutely no doubt that the actions of unborn humans qualify as "parasitic". True parasites, however, are always members of a species different from the host-species, and so it is impossible for unborn humans to actually qualify as "parasites". But "parasitic"? Absolutely! That Is Most Certainly Objectively Measurable Truth!
A STUPIDLY PREJUDICED LIE. PLUS, IT IS IS PERSONS THAT HAVE RIGHTS, NOT HUMANS. When will you offer the slightest bit of a valid rationale that human entities should have rights just because they are human?
TO NON-HUMAN PERSONS??? You know, like dolphins. Or perhaps Koko the Gorilla? Or maybe Chantek the Orangutan? And what about intelligent extraterrestrial aliens we haven't met yet? Do you think describing them in terms of human characteristics will be something they will approve-of? You can blather about the Stupidly Prejudiced Master Race Idiocy of "human rights" endlessly, and I will still remind you that the U.S. Constitution-plus-Amendments is about person rights, not human rights. And there is nothing you can do which will ever cause the phrase "human rights" to sound ethically superior to the phrase "person rights" --especially when not even you would grant rights to the human entities linked in my first paragraph of this msg.
WHICH MAKES YOUR SIDE THE ONE BLATHERING IDIOCY. Simply because the word "human" in "human rights" includes hydatiform moles and cancer and cuticle cells and more. And there is no way you or any other abortion opponent will grant those human entities rights, which makes the phrase "human rights" NOT applicable to all things human, and proves the idiocy you are blathering. While "person rights" would apply to all persons no matter how unhuman they might be. Considering the size of the Universe and the probable total population of non-human persons, preferring "person rights" to "human rights" means a vastly greater number of entities would have rights, than what your Stupidly Prejudices Master Race Idiocy would allow.
LIKELY RELATED TO A DEFINITION OF "HUMAN" THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HUMAN BIOLOGY.
AND AGAIN, NOT ASSOCIATED WITH HUMAN BIOLOGY. Only the idiocy of blathering abortion opponents wants folks to conflate definitions, putting human biology in places where it does not belong.
THEN YOU ARE GUILTY OF IDIOTICALLY CONFLATING DEFINITIONS. Especially when you know full well that there are plenty of human entities that neither you nor anyone else will consider granting right-to-life, such as hydatidiform moles, cancer cells, and cuticle cells.
IT IS NOT "QUAINT" --it is purest idiocy. Because not even abortion opponents are stupid enough to claim: "Oh! Cancer cells are human entities! They deserve right-to-life! All research into killing them must be banned!"
YET THE CONCEPT OF "PERSON" IS NOT SO ARBITRARY. It can be as simple as any entity that meets these three conditions:
SEE YOUR NEAREST ROBOT --of today's technological level, that is. Future robots, of course, are likely to be sophisticated enough to qualify as persons per the description above.
WHAT'S WORSE IS THE IDIOCY OF CONFLATING DEFINITIONS. The Stupidly Prejudiced Master Race Idiocy that you blather will in no sense allow you to grant rights to non-humans, simply because you fundamentally base your idiocy on human biology.
BRAGGING ABOUT YOURSELF, AGAIN? Did you ever read "The Naked Ape", by Desmond Morris, to see just how many behaviors called "human" are performed by other species?
A STUPID LIE --since the underlying issue is the definition-conflation of abortion opponents, caused by Stupidly Prejudiced Master Race Idiocy.
LYING ABOUT WHAT I WROTE GETS YOU NOWHERE. I was talking about a particular definition of "human", not all definitions of "human".
IS THAT YOUR LATEST WAY OF SAYING YOU REFUSE TO LEARN FACTS? Tsk, tsk!