• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Right To Life

Yes, I am able to admit when I dont know something, instead of avoiding answering and pretending I'm a pseudo-intellectual and no one would understand my answers anyway.

True. You needn't go about saying about yourself that you are: "pretending" to be "a pseudo-intellectual ". ;)
 
True. You needn't go about saying about yourself that you are: "pretending" to be "a pseudo-intellectual ". ;)

No, that label has been levelled at you many times in the past, as you post studies and research verbatim and then cannot articulate your own interpretation of them. You dont actually understand it...or it's completely irrelevant...and when called out, you claim "we just need to educate ourselves," or "it's not my fault you cant understand it."

When in fact...you should indeed be able to break down your high-minded, abstract info into something that others can understand. It's the best indicator that someone actually understands it themselves.

The avoidance shows a vacuum of understanding...or dishonesty in posting erroneous info. Classic joG!
 
No, that label has been levelled at you many times in the past, as you post studies and research verbatim and then cannot articulate your own interpretation of them. You dont actually understand it...or it's completely irrelevant...and when called out, you claim "we just need to educate ourselves," or "it's not my fault you cant understand it."

When in fact...you should indeed be able to break down your high-minded, abstract info into something that others can understand. It's the best indicator that someone actually understands it themselves.

The avoidance shows a vacuum of understanding...or dishonesty in posting erroneous info. Classic joG!

And, when you do not know how to argue a moral point other than "it's legal!!!", this is quite typical of your desperate reflex.
 
And, when you do not know how to argue a moral point other than "it's legal!!!", this is quite typical of your desperate reflex.
Please, share an example! I very solidly argue the morality and ethics of the abortion issue.

We're in that sub-forum...please! Once again, I ask you to support your comment with substance....

Edit: ethics is the foundation of my pro-choice position.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom