- Joined
- Oct 9, 2014
- Messages
- 7,454
- Reaction score
- 4,473
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
The bandwagon appeal--everybody's doing it--doesn't really work for me, nor does your "what civility demands." My having an opinion contrary to yours is not uncivil. I don't really have much interest in defending my position; I don't think it requires a defense. I just occasionally like to express my position.
The funny thing is that if you weren't born in the US, you might be on the Muslim bandwagon or the Buddhist bandwagon. I know you don't care about the part that human rights plays in national civility because nearly everything that the christian right believes in is uncivil and divisive and that's the way they like it.
And speaking of what civility requires....
I've never mentioned Jesus. Why did you bring Him into our conversation? Have you not noticed that I haven't spoken of my faith at all (and don't intend to either)?
I mention Jesus because he represents the dominant superstition of American magical thinkers.
I can certainly agree that your life is as sacred as is mine or someone’s who is on death row. “All human life” means exactly that--all, and human worth is not on a sliding scale. Either each one of us is valuable, or none of us is. And I think that all human life is valuable—sacred because each one of us was uniquely created. And being uniquely created, sir, is a biological fact, not a religious belief.
If you believe what you just wrote, how can you undermine the inherent value of women's lives by demanding they risk them in unwanted pregnancy? It is a contradiction. Besides, the pro-lifers are concerned about abortion, not capital punishment so if you are against state executions, you are among the minority of pro-lifers.
You're virulently anti-religion, and I get that. But you are ignoring natural law.
I have become anti-theist because I recognize that it is a conversation stopper. When the divine or any other superstition is employed in a debate, there is nowhere else to go. Conversations with believers inevitably reach the point where the phrase "that's where faith comes in" is used and where faith comes in, rational thinking goes away.
I also realize, though, that the ability or desire to use the abstract god to explain our existence is an evolved behavior that I could never argue out of a person. The frustration of recognizing the simultaneous pathology and immutability of faith is what stokes my resentment. We were not created but the observation that we are inherently bad is an ironic accident of evolution whereby our imaginations have become the enemy of our better senses.