• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

This is some great info on planned parenthood

12 seconds into first video....NOPE

"Murderous Procedures" :roll:
 
Maybe if America came up with a more mature and adult approach to the issue of abortion, rather than having so many people trying to push it “out of sight, out of mind”, you wouldn’t be stuck with an organisation like Planned Parenthood having such a singular dominant influence?
 
Federal judge blocks Texas abortion law


A federal judge temporarily on Thursday blocked a Texas law that would limit second-trimester abortions in a ruling that came one day before the regulation was to take effect.

U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel of Austin concluded that abortion providers established that, without a 14-day temporary restraining order, a Texas woman seeking an abortion after the 15th week of pregnancy could be denied access to “the most commonly used and safest” procedure available.

“The act leaves that woman and her physician with abortion procedures that are more complex, risky, expensive, difficult for many women to arrange, and often involve multi-day visits to physicians, and overnight hospital stays,” the judge wrote.

Yeakel also set a hearing for Sept. 14 in Austin to consider whether to issue a preliminary injunction that could bar Texas from enforcing the law into the future.

Read more: Texas abortion law blocked by federal judge
 
Cable said:
Crowder makes too much sense...


Click to expand...


What an easily debunked crock of bull****. To say nothing of the fact that what PP does today is notning like the histrionic whining about Sanger back then.

https://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/articles/sanger-hitler_equation.php
Fact Check: Was Planned Parenthood Started To 'Control' The Black Population? : It's All Politics : NPR

Pro-tip: relying on Crowder for anything approaching rational or honest is a fool's errand.

Warning: the links I supplied require reading and thinking. They're not for everyone.
 
Cable said:
It's so weird that you guys have such a strong stake in this. Doesn't the destruction of the family mean anything?
Click to expand...

Then stop destroying families
 
Tanngrisnir said:
What an easily debunked crock of bull****. To say nothing of the fact that what PP does today is notning like the histrionic whining about Sanger back then.

https://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/articles/sanger-hitler_equation.php
Fact Check: Was Planned Parenthood Started To 'Control' The Black Population? : It's All Politics : NPR

Pro-tip: relying on Crowder for anything approaching rational or honest is a fool's errand.

Warning: the links I supplied require reading and thinking. They're not for everyone.
Click to expand...

I read your article and I think it proves Crowder right not disprove him
 
Cable said:
Isn't this what liberal scientists call anecdotal evidence? This is what you have?
Click to expand...

My question requires a yes or no answer. Why are you trying to deflect?

BTW, I am not liberal.
 
Scrabaholic said:
You do realize that Sanger was anti abortion, right? She was on YOUR side of the issue.
Click to expand...

I don't believe it's true at all, but anyway, if this is true, why aren't more of you on her side? Isn't she a sister in arms?
 
Scrabaholic said:
My question requires a yes or no answer. Why are you trying to deflect?

BTW, I am not liberal.
Click to expand...

then if you are truly a conservative, what kind of conservative are you?
 
RamFel said:
I don't believe it's true at all, but anyway, if this is true, why aren't more of you on her side? Isn't she a sister in arms?
Click to expand...

She was against abortion her entire life. That is a fact
 
RamFel said:
I don't believe it's true at all, but anyway, if this is true, why aren't more of you on her side? Isn't she a sister in arms?
Click to expand...

Why would she be? Like I said, she was anti-abortion:

On the evidence in “The Woman Rebel,” the real reason Sanger declined to advocate abortion, notwithstanding the law’s flexibility and what she took to be the procedure’s safety, is that abortion appalled her.

She turned women seeking abortions away from her clinics: “I do not approve of abortion.” She called it “sordid,” “abhorrent,” “terrible,” “barbaric,” a “horror.” She called abortionists “blood-sucking men with MD after their names who perform operations for the price of so-and-so.” She called the results of abortion “an outrageous slaughter,” “infanticide,” “foeticide,” and “the killing of babies.”
Click to expand...

https://www.redstate.com/ironchapman/2013/01/23/what-did-margaret-sanger-think-about-abortion/
 
Scrabaholic said:
You do realize that Sanger was anti abortion, right? She was on YOUR side of the issue.
Click to expand...

A little bit about sanger.

"Sanger’s militancy is so flagrant and persistent that one can clearly see
the dishonest attempts of her progressive biographers to deny the centrality of
eugenics in her core ideology. In Linda Gordon’s book Woman’s Body,
Woman’s Right, a history of the birth control movement in America, the
author attempts to distinguish Sanger’s supposedly moderate, benign, leftwing
eugenics from supposedly extreme, malign, right-wing eugenics that
emerged with Nazism.17 This distinction is pure fiction and relies entirely on
the supposition that Nazism was somehow right-wing. As we know by now,
this is part of the big lie. In reality, Sanger’s eugenics and Nazi eugenics were
cut from the same cloth, as Sanger herself realized.
We can see this from two of Sanger’s close associates, Clarence Gamble,
who funded Sanger’s projects and spoke at her conferences, and Lothrop
Stoddard, who published in Sanger’s magazines and served on the board of
the American Birth Control League—the forerunner of Planned Parenthood.
Stoddard was the bestselling author of a notorious tract, The Rising Tide of
Color Against White World Supremacy, that portrayed the pristine Nordic
race being swamped through immigration and interracial marriage by
degenerate hordes from other lesser races. Both Lothrop and Gamble became
avid Nazi sympathizers who sought to import Nazi sterilization programs in
their full magnitude to America.
Gamble proclaimed that the Nazi program “will secure Germany a place
in the history of races” and insisted that it “sets the pattern which other
nations and other racial groups must follow.”18 Stoddard traveled to
Germany where he met with top Nazi racial eugenicists Eugen Fischer and
Fritz Lenz. He also met with top Nazi officials Heinrich Himmler and
Joachim von Ribbentrop, and even secured a coveted audience with Hitler.
Stoddard’s 1940 book Into the Darkness is a paean to Hitler and Nazi
eugenics. These were the circles in which Sanger moved and the kind of
people with whom she associated.
Now we turn to Sanger herself. In April 1933, Sanger’s magazine Birth
Control Review published an article “Eugenic Sterilization, an Urgent Need”
authored by Ernst Rudin, chief architect of the Nazi sterilization program and
mentor of Joseph Mengele, and also reprinted a pamphlet he had prepared for
British eugenicists. Writing in 1938, while Nazi sterilization was in full
swing, Sanger urged America to do as the Nazis were doing. “In animal
industry, the poor stock is not allowed to breed,” Sanger said. “In gardens,
the weeds are kept down.” America, Sanger concluded, should learn from the
Germans and carry out nature’s own mandate of getting rid of “human
weeds"--Dinesh Desouza
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom