• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dr. Alveda King: Trump Is Leading Civil Rights for Unborn

Bucky

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 5, 2015
Messages
28,608
Reaction score
6,367
Location
Washington
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Dr. Alveda King, niece of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said President Trump is "leading the charge for civil rights today for the little unborn persons in the womb who have a right to live."

All people have a right to live "from the womb to the tomb," said King, who directs the pro-life campaign, Civil Rights for the Unborn.

Dr. Alveda King: Trump Is Leading Civil Rights for Unborn | Fox News Insider

I 100% agree with the niece of the great MLK Jr, one of the greatest civil rights leaders of our time. First off, at the heart of the abortion issue, it is a civil rights issue. The majority of abortions being taken place are that of black and Latino babies in minority neighborhoods. When a PP opens in a neighborhood, it has a chilling effect on that neighborhood. A ghostly feel.

Non-violent resolutions are what we need. Just like what Dr. King advocated. Abortion is not a non-violent resolution, it is a resolution that is one-sided, unfair and a violation of our rights.
 
I 100% agree with the niece
WE KNOW YOU AGREE WITH STUPID LIES. You've spouted similar blatherings many times.

BUT FACTS ARE FACTS. It is impossible for unborn humans to qualify as persons, and provable non-persons (such as unborn human animals) generally don't have right-to-life. (The primary exception are animals facing species-extinction, which obviously is not true of a planet overpopulated with humans and their offspring.)

of the great MLK Jr, one of the greatest civil rights leaders of our time.
AGREED. But even great people sometimes make mistakes. Abortion is **provably** not a civil rights issue, simply because only people need civil rights, and unborn humans cannot possibly qualify as people.

First off, at the heart of the abortion issue, it is a civil rights issue.
STUPIDLY FALSE, as just indicated above. Since it is a Stupid Lie to claim unborn humans are persons, it is Stupidly False to claim abortion is a civil rights issue.

The majority of abortions being taken place are that of black and Latino babies in minority neighborhoods.
IT IS STILL THEIR CHOICE. No one forces them to get abortions. Except possibly political conservatives who run businesses that don't pay black and Latino folks enough to support having kids. Not that those abortions actually matter, anyway, since both populations are **GROWING**, despite all the abortions done in those neighborhoods.

When a PP opens in a neighborhood, it has a chilling effect on that neighborhood. A ghostly feel.
OPINION --worthless unsupported blather. Tsk, tsk!

Non-violent resolutions are what we need.
THAT WOULD BE BETTER AND CHEAPER CONTRACEPTIVES. The vast majority of group-vs-group violence in the History of humanity can be directly traced to overpopulation, each group selfishly wanting limited resources that others also want. Even back when we all were just hunter-gatherers, the available resources, in any specified area, could only support a limited human population.

Just like what Dr. King advocated.
CONTRACEPTION, even including drugs like RU-486 that can prevent womb-implantation, most certainly counts as non-violent. (When more than half of all conceptions Naturally fail to lead to womb-implantations, it cannot be called "violence" if the womb-environment changes to prevent other implantations of blastocysts.)

Abortion is not a non-violent resolution, it is a resolution that is one-sided,
ANOTHER STUPID LIE. You are, as usual, ignoring the Fact that an unborn human commits at least 4 different types of assault upon its hostess. She absolutely has the right of self-defense from assault!

unfair and a violation of our rights.
ANOTHER STUPD LIE. Unborn humans are not persons, and do not qualify as part of the group included by the word "our".
 
Last edited:
Poor Dr Alveda King, Poor Bucky.

Looks like you both were duped.


Trumps Surpreme Court pick agrees that Roe v Wade is prescedent.....
In plain English ...that's means it is law....That law is set in stone.
It will not be questioned.

From this Fox News article:

Judge Neil Gorsuch said Tuesday the controversial Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion is “precedent” and acknowledged the ruling had been reaffirmed “many times.”

Gorsuch, President Trump’s nominee to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated when Justice Antonin Scalia died, does not have much of a history ruling on abortion issues, and the contentious subject was one of the first topics broached during the question-and-answer session of Gorsuch’s confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Roe v. Wade, decided in 1973, is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court, it has been reaffirmed…and all of the other factors that go into analyzing precedent have to be considered,” Gorsuch told Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. “…A good judge will consider it as precedent of the United States Supreme Court, worthy as treatment of precedent like any other.”
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the first Democrat to question Gorsuch, immediately followed up, citing the importance of the issue since, she said, President Trump “said he would appoint someone who would overturn Roe.”

“Once a case is settled, that adds to the determinacy of the law,” Gorsuch told Feinstein, clarifying his position on precedent. “What was once a hotly-contested issue is no longer a hotly-contested issue. We move forward.”

Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent' | Fox News
 
Alveda King is an idiot. I'm sorry, but it's true.
 
PP moves into those neighborhoods....well...because they are typically full of poor woman who can't afford BC and/or women well being services....and these poorer women rely on low cost or free BC offered by PP. When will people realize that PP is not just about abortions.
 
Elective abortion is here to stay until the day comes that men have some say as to the rights of their progeny being terminated. Until that happens, abort, dissect, or eat fetal tissue for that matter. It's settled.
 
The majority of abortions being taken place are that of black and Latino babies in minority neighborhoods.
:roll:

So, you want unmarried, uneducated, welfare recipients pumping out more and more kids - and this'll be a yuge benefit to society, and the country as a whole, how exactly???
 
:roll:

So, you want unmarried, uneducated, welfare recipients pumping out more and more kids - and this'll be a yuge benefit to society, and the country as a whole, how exactly???

Well said.

There was a Pew Forum article a few years ago where Rev. Verazey , who was the pastor at the Zion Baptist Church for 33 years and became president of the Religious Coalition of Reproductive Choice for than a decade was interviewed.

Here is a snip of the interview :

Although abortion is a very difficult decision, it can be the most responsible decision a person can make when faced with an unintended pregnancy or a pregnancy that will have serious health consequences.


Depending on the circumstances, it might be selfish to bring a child into the world. You know, a lot of people say, “You must bring this child into the world.” They are 100 percent supportive while the child is in the womb. As soon as the child is born, they abort the child in other ways. They abort a child through lack of health care, lack of education, lack of housing, and through poverty, which can drive a child into drugs or the criminal justice system.

So is it selfish to bring children into the world and not care for them? I think the other side can be very selfish by neglecting the children we have already. For all practical purposes, children whom we are neglecting are being aborted.

Pro-Choice Does Not Mean Pro-Abortion: An Argument for Abortion Rights Featuring the Rev. Carlton Veazey | Pew Research Center
 
Last edited:
Alveda King is an idiot. I'm sorry, but it's true.

Calling people that helped Africian American achieve equality, idiots, well, that's just pathetic.

Especially considering you went on this Kumbaya earlier about how minorities and people that struggled should stick together.
 
Elective abortion is here to stay until the day comes that men have some say as to the rights of their progeny being terminated. Until that happens, abort, dissect, or eat fetal tissue for that matter. It's settled.

Ewww...to, well, all of this.
 
Calling people that helped Africian American achieve equality, idiots, well, that's just pathetic.

I'm not talking about MLK. As far as I've seen, Alveda King is only notable for being a pro-life activist, not a civil rights activist.

Especially considering you went on this Kumbaya earlier about how minorities and people that struggled should stick together.

Quote me where I said that.
 
Last edited:
PP moves into those neighborhoods....well...because they are typically full of poor woman who can't afford BC and/or women well being services....and these poorer women rely on low cost or free BC offered by PP. When will people realize that PP is not just about abortions.

Somebody called me a liar when I insisted they also have men's health services.:lamo

When I was much younger and had friends without insurance wanting health services going through county services meant they had to wait along time for an appointment that once they got there they had to wait hours to get into a room. So essentially a gyn appointment meant missing a day of work. Most I knew switched over to Planned Parenthood. I know two that had their pre-cancers treated. They also were very helpful in helping them access outside services when the pre-cancers were found.

Planned Parenthood has a network of services that are valuable to many communities. Particularly in an atmosphere where many politicians want to make sure the working poor through Medicaid expansion are screwed over.
 
Calling people that helped Africian American achieve equality, idiots, well, that's just pathetic.

Especially considering you went on this Kumbaya earlier about how minorities and people that struggled should stick together.

How did Alveda King do that?
 
Somebody called me a liar when I insisted they also have men's health services.:lamo

When I was much younger and had friends without insurance wanting health services going through county services meant they had to wait along time for an appointment that once they got there they had to wait hours to get into a room. So essentially a gyn appointment meant missing a day of work. Most I knew switched over to Planned Parenthood. I know two that had their pre-cancers treated. They also were very helpful in helping them access outside services when the pre-cancers were found.

Planned Parenthood has a network of services that are valuable to many communities. Particularly in an atmosphere where many politicians want to make sure the working poor through Medicaid expansion are screwed over.

Ah, that's bull**** Y2L.

We all know that Planned Parenthood is only there to kill babies and sell dead fetuses to the Lizard-people.
 
Dr. Alveda King: Trump Is Leading Civil Rights for Unborn | Fox News Insider

I 100% agree with the niece of the great MLK Jr, one of the greatest civil rights leaders of our time. First off, at the heart of the abortion issue, it is a civil rights issue. The majority of abortions being taken place are that of black and Latino babies in minority neighborhoods. When a PP opens in a neighborhood, it has a chilling effect on that neighborhood. A ghostly feel.

Non-violent resolutions are what we need. Just like what Dr. King advocated. Abortion is not a non-violent resolution, it is a resolution that is one-sided, unfair and a violation of our rights.

What we need is pragmatism.

Better access to the best birth control (long term options that are truly affordable)

Turning an unwanted pregnancy into a wanted one. But this involves a woman feeling comfortable that she and her children will have safe places to live, good educational opportunities, and good available and accessible local healthcare.
But many of the very people seeking to end abortion fight strongly against funding social services that would help her if she decides to maintain the pregnancy.
 
Pro-life Honorary-Doctor Alveda King : has personally had more abortions in her life than most people who are "pro-choice".
 
Pro-life Honorary-Doctor Alveda King : has personally had more abortions in her life than most people who are "pro-choice".

Ahh, I have trying to find out how she earned the title Dr.

Guess she did not earn it.

She did with a Bacholors of Arts degree from Central Michigan University.

She is also a contributor to Fox News...guess that's why I hardly ever hear about her. ;)
 
Ahh, I have trying to find out how she earned the title Dr.

Guess she did not earn it.

she graduated with a Bacholors of Arts degree from Central Michigan University.

You'll find that a lot of people with the Dr. in their title did not earn it, or obtained it from some BS institution.
 
Ah, that's bull**** Y2L.

We all know that Planned Parenthood is only there to kill babies and sell dead fetuses to the Lizard-people.

The Lizard People give awards.

exceeding+abortion+visits.jpeg


(I still can't believe people bought that award:lamo)
 
Pro-life Honorary-Doctor Alveda King : has personally had more abortions in her life than most people who are "pro-choice".

Like I said it always cracks me up when people refer to her as Dr. Alveda King -- it was an honorary degree from a religious school in NH - and she can't even cite exactly what she received it for, other than being "pro-life."
 
PP moves into those neighborhoods....well...because they are typically full of poor woman who can't afford BC and/or women well being services....and these poorer women rely on low cost or free BC offered by PP. When will people realize that PP is not just about abortions.

Yes judge he killed children, but lets remember that he helped mothers from having children too.
 
Elective abortion is here to stay until the day comes that men have some say as to the rights of their progeny being terminated. Until that happens, abort, dissect, or eat fetal tissue for that matter. It's settled.

Ewww...to, well, all of this.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/feb/10/medicalscience.research

Doctors are developing artificial wombs in which embryos can grow outside a woman's body.


Come on guys...you too can have a child all by yourself.
No need for women or any of that other nastiness.

Sounds like the perfect solution.
 
Back
Top Bottom