• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dr. Alveda King: Trump Is Leading Civil Rights for Unborn

What baffles me is how people in this forum can equate elective abortion as a right. This type of depravity and logic is usually found in the Middle East.

It baffles me that anyone can equate rape victims with losers......
 
I didn't realize the left had such animosty towards the civil rights movement.
What the **** are you babbling about? Who said anything about the civil right movement? Learn to read in context and acquire some intellectual integrity.
 
By this logic, you think MLK JR is a douche too? Did he call himself a doctor as well?

Talk about a disrespectful comment towards a civil rights icon.
Why not educate yourself before spouting your usual ignorant crap? Dr. King earned his doctorate from Boston University.
 
Calling people stupid liars? Care to lose the arrogance and childish name calling FutureIncoming?
More of your typical uneducated drivel from you. learn the difference between commenting on a post and a person. Have someone in the 8th grade explain that to you.
 
Calling people stupid liars?
NOPE. Anyone who can talk is perfectly capable of spouting a Stupid Lie. The difference between an ordinary lie and a Stupid Lie is the ease with which the lie can be proved to be a lie --the Stupid Lie is so easily proved to be a lie that, while one might wonder about the intelligence of the person who spouted it, it is still quite possible for anyone, no matter how smart, to be able to spout a Stupid Lie. Abortion opponents prove this Fact quite often!

Care to lose the arrogance
YOUR OPINION IS IRRELEVANT. Only Facts matter, in a Debate. And since you haven't got any Facts able to support the notion that there is something wrong with abortion in this day-and-age....

and childish name calling FutureIncoming?
YOUR OPINION IS IRRELEVANT. See the first part of this message for the Facts.
 
By this logic, you think MLK JR is a douche too? Did he call himself a doctor as well?

Her uncle, MLK, Jr. - who barely knew her (and the King family has largely disowned Alveda) -- actually EARNED a Doctorate degree.

Getting a paper from a two bit religious college one single day - (one she never attended, nor a college that issues actual Doctorate degrees) for the sole purpose of being "pro-life" (even SHE doesn't know why she was awarded it) -- doesn't entitle you to to call yourself a Doctor.

Talk about a disrespectful comment towards a civil rights icon.
Wingnut Alveda is not a civil rights icon. In ANY sense of the word.
 
Last edited:
Only Facts matter, in a Debate.

And you have facts? In a facts based discussion, abortion itself is an immoral act. If you want to argue abortion on the grounds of logic and philosophy, lets go ahead but spare me this "I have facts on my side" arrogance.

Are you the oracle? Do you know when life starts? Claiming that you know these "facts" makes you a false prophet.
 
YOUR OPINION IS IRRELEVANT. Only Facts matter, in a Debate. And since you haven't got any Facts able to support the notion that there is something wrong with abortion in this day-and-age....

You very much have a Christopher Hitchens mentality in regards to facts. I can assure you are not providing facts but peddling myths as facts. Tsk. tsk.
 
By this logic, you think MLK JR is a douche too? Did he call himself a doctor as well?

Talk about a disrespectful comment towards a civil rights icon.

I believe MLK EARNED his doctorate in theology from Boston University.

Do you have "alternative facts"?
 
Last edited:
And you have facts? In a facts based discussion, abortion itself is an immoral act. If you want to argue abortion on the grounds of logic and philosophy, lets go ahead but spare me this "I have facts on my side" arrogance.

Are you the oracle? Do you know when life starts? Claiming that you know these "facts" makes you a false prophet.

Pew research shows that 53 percent of Americans and 49 percent of American Catholics believe that abortion is moral or that it not a moral issue.
 
After reading up on Alveda King, I have to admit I am disgusted.

She has passed around lies as truth in order to assassinate someone's character.

My personal favorite was not taking one moments time to figure out that a racially charge quote she was putting out there was a lie.

https://twitter.com/alvedacking/status/613105662566862848

"colored people are like weeds that need to be exterminated"

Her uncle would be disgusted.
 
It baffles me that anyone can equate rape victims with losers......

tenor.gif
 
Calling people stupid liars? Care to lose the arrogance and childish name calling FutureIncoming?

You have no right to complain about anyone being arrogant and name calling, Mr. Rape-Victims-Deserve-It.
 
Last edited:
You have no right to complain about anyone being arrogant and name calling, Mr. Rape-Victims-Deserve-It.

Tell me he really never said that. Please.
 
And you have facts?
MOST CERTAINLY I HAVE FACTS. And I've linked them in many messages to abortion opponents.

In a facts based discussion, abortion itself is an immoral act.
NOT A FACT. You have not the slightest bit of Objectively Verifiable Evidence, much less proof, that abortion is immoral. Here is a **FACT** for you: The definition of "abortion" is broad enough to include miscarriages. Only an idiot would claim that Natural miscarriages are immoral! And therefore abortion is not inherently immoral.

FURTHERMORE, the **claim** that abortion is immoral is nothing more than just a claim. It doesn't matter in the least who claims it, or how many claim it, so long as none are able to support that claim with Objectively Verifiable Evidence.

If you want to argue abortion on the grounds of logic and philosophy, lets go ahead but spare me this "I have facts on my side" arrogance.
NOPE. Entirely because the Facts actually are on my side, and you deserve to have your nose rubbed in them, at least until you stop Denying Facts. Like the Fact that you absolutely cannot support the worthless claim that abortion is immoral!

Are you the oracle? Do you know when life starts? Claiming that you know these "facts" makes you a false prophet.
FIRST, TRY SHOWING THAT ANY OF THOSE THINGS HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE OVERALL ABORTION DEBATE. I don't recall claiming to be an "oracle". I also don't recall claiming to know any facts that I have failed to support with evidence.
 
WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH QUOTING SOMETHING ABOUT AN OPINION? Opinions are not facts!
You very much have a Christopher Hitchens mentality in regards to facts.
NEVER HEARD OF HIM. (So, after looking up the name...) Seems to have been a rational kind of guy. Unlike abortion opponents, as I proved here.

I can assure you
NOT THE SAME THING AS PROVIDING OBJECTIVELY VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE. Why should anyone believe your mere unsupported say-so?

are not providing facts
HAW! HAW!! HAW!!! One of my favorite FACTS is that much of the placenta has the same DNA as the fetus. That means that much of the placenta is part of the overall unborn human. Since the placenta functions as a vital organ for the unborn human, while an ordinary born baby does not need an attached placenta functioning as a vital organ, that FACT about placental DNA constitutes proof that an unborn human is very different from an ordinary baby, and should never be called a baby. The simplest way to accurately think about the situation is, just as a baby is too immature to be called an adult, an unborn human is too immature to be called a baby. It truly is a "baby under construction", and no more deserves to be equated with an ordinary baby than a house-under-construction deserves to be equated with a house that can be lived-in.

but peddling myths as facts. Tsk. tsk.
PROVE IT. As mentioned above, why should anyone believe your mere unsupported say-so?
 
Last edited:
After reading up on Alveda King, I have to admit I am disgusted.

She has passed around lies as truth in order to assassinate someone's character.

My personal favorite was not taking one moments time to figure out that a racially charge quote she was putting out there was a lie.

https://twitter.com/alvedacking/status/613105662566862848

"colored people are like weeds that need to be exterminated"

Her uncle would be disgusted.

For years she also spread the lie MLK, Jr. was a republican -- till finally, finally she had to admit she was talking out of her ass.
 
Why not educate yourself before spouting your usual ignorant crap? Dr. King earned his doctorate from Boston University.

"Earned" isn't quite precise. Boston U. Panel Finds Plagiarism by Dr. King - NYTimes.com

Alveda King holds a Master's in business admin., and if she earned it honestly, I'd say her academic credentials are on a par, albeit in different fields, with her uncle's. And honorary doctorates are earned/awarded for various reasons.

http://www.the-scientist.com/?artic...onorary-Degrees--Controversial-For-Centuries/

Celebrities who have honorary degrees - Business Insider
 
Back
Top Bottom